Sign here if you are boycotting the BS National Championship game

Gee, I can't think of any reason why OSU got the shaft except for three reasons:

1. Money
2. Money
3. and.......money

If they were OU, UT, USC, or Ohio State, they would have gotten the nod. Nah, no politics or dollar chasing here, none what...so....ever.

Gee, I can't think of any reason why OSU got the shaft except for three reasons:

1. Money
2. Money
3. and.......money

If they were OU, UT, USC, or Ohio State, they would have gotten the nod. Nah, no politics or dollar chasing here, none what...so....ever.

QuistisTrepe_

[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

Gee, I can't think of any reason why OSU got the shaft except for three reasons:

1. Money
2. Money
3. and.......money

If they were OU, UT, USC, or Ohio State, they would have gotten the nod. Nah, no politics or dollar chasing here, none what...so....ever.

SF_KiLLaMaN

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

Gee, I can't think of any reason why OSU got the shaft except for three reasons:

1. Money
2. Money
3. and.......money

If they were OU, UT, USC, or Ohio State, they would have gotten the nod. Nah, no politics or dollar chasing here, none what...so....ever.

DroidPhysX

Oh, and LMAO at Baylor getting stuck in the Alamo Bowl with a #12 BCS ranking. So much for having a leading Heisman Trophy candidate and the top offense in the nation, a lot of good that did them. What a ******* farce.

Against UW? This game is going to be a slaughter.:lol:

[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

Gee, I can't think of any reason why OSU got the shaft except for three reasons:

1. Money
2. Money
3. and.......money

If they were OU, UT, USC, or Ohio State, they would have gotten the nod. Nah, no politics or dollar chasing here, none what...so....ever.

SF_KiLLaMaN

This is what happens when a global sports network gets in bed with a dubious organization like the BCS. ESPN didn't get the nickname "Eastern Sports Players Network" for nothing. VA Tech is the bigger name and ratings draw, Boise and Kansas aren't, that's why they're in the bigger money bowl game.

How the hell has the BCS not been hit with an antitrust suit yet?

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

Gee, I can't think of any reason why OSU got the shaft except for three reasons:

1. Money
2. Money
3. and.......money

If they were OU, UT, USC, or Ohio State, they would have gotten the nod. Nah, no politics or dollar chasing here, none what...so....ever.

DroidPhysX

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

Gee, I can't think of any reason why OSU got the shaft except for three reasons:

1. Money
2. Money
3. and.......money

If they were OU, UT, USC, or Ohio State, they would have gotten the nod. Nah, no politics or dollar chasing here, none what...so....ever.

QuistisTrepe_

This is what happens when a global sports network gets in bed with a dubious organization like the BCS. ESPN didn't get the nickname "Eastern Sports Players Network" for nothing. VA Tech is the bigger name and ratings draw, Boise and Kansas aren't, that's why they're in the bigger money bowl game.

How the hell has the BCS not been hit with an antitrust suit yet?

Same thing with the 2011 Fiesta Bowl.

#25 UConn vs. #9 Oklahoma. :lol:

Completely ignored teams like Nevada and Utah

Same thing with the 2011 Fiesta Bowl.

#25 UConn vs. #9 Oklahoma. :lol:

Completely ignored teams like Nevada and Utah

DroidPhysX

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Same thing with the 2011 Fiesta Bowl.

#25 UConn vs. #9 Oklahoma. :lol:

Completely ignored teams like Nevada and Utah

GamerForca

[QUOTE="GamerForca"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Same thing with the 2011 Fiesta Bowl.

#25 UConn vs. #9 Oklahoma. :lol:

Completely ignored teams like Nevada and Utah

DroidPhysX

Just looked over the matchups compared to the BCS rankings. Yeah, the Sugar and Orange Bowls are so laughably rigged. Baylor got completely ******.

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"]

Gee, I can't think of any reason why OSU got the shaft except for three reasons:

1. Money
2. Money
3. and.......money

If they were OU, UT, USC, or Ohio State, they would have gotten the nod. Nah, no politics or dollar chasing here, none what...so....ever.

QuistisTrepe_

This is what happens when a global sports network gets in bed with a dubious organization like the BCS. ESPN didn't get the nickname "Eastern Sports Players Network" for nothing. VA Tech is the bigger name and ratings draw, Boise and Kansas aren't, that's why they're in the bigger money bowl game.

How the hell has the BCS not been hit with an antitrust suit yet?

[QUOTE="channtheman1"]The BCS voters did put Alabama at 2 again. We saw this game already... why are we watching it again? Oh yeah, SEC bias.No_Hablo_Ingles

Nope, two best teams are playing, as it should be.

Big 12 commish now wants a 4 team playoff system. :?

Wait, so it wasn't right for the big 12 three years ago when the SEC commish suggested the same thing, albeit different big 12 commish at the time.

Nope, two best teams are playing, as it should be.

bleehum

If they're as a result of votes, then I guess we'll never know who the best is will we?

When I checked Friday, Ok St had 5 wins against current top 25 teams alone........ mastershake575

[QUOTE="mastershake575"]When I checked Friday, Ok St had 5 wins against current top 25 teams alone........ No_Hablo_Ingles

[QUOTE="No_Hablo_Ingles"][QUOTE="mastershake575"]When I checked Friday, Ok St had 5 wins against current top 25 teams alone........ SF_KiLLaMaN

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]

[QUOTE="No_Hablo_Ingles"] and a lost to a team that ended up 6-6. Alabama's one and only lost came to the #1 team in the nation... in overtime... losing by 3 points.No_Hablo_Ingles

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]

[QUOTE="No_Hablo_Ingles"] and a lost to a team that ended up 6-6. Alabama's one and only lost came to the #1 team in the nation... in overtime... losing by 3 points.No_Hablo_Ingles

[QUOTE="mastershake575"]When I checked Friday, Ok St had 5 wins against current top 25 teams alone........ No_Hablo_Ingles

not only that but im not even arguing who should go , im arguing that "oh there in the SEC" statement which is BS since there not even top 20 in that nation in strength of schedule....mastershake575

Who the better team is is 100% subjective. That can't be their reasoning for picking one team over the other. monkeytoes61

Why are coaches allowed to vote? That's just bizarre. They have a financial incentive to give higher rankings to themselves and their opponents (to pad strength of schedule), and the individual voting results reflect this.

Why are coaches allowed to vote? That's just bizarre. They have a financial incentive to give higher rankings to themselves and their opponents (to pad strength of schedule), and the individual voting results reflect this.

Oleg_Huzwog

[QUOTE="GodofBigMacs"][QUOTE="GamerForca"] [QUOTE="The_Zoid"]I said this in another thread...but LSU vs Stanford OSU vs Alabama Winners play. Is that scenario really a world of trouble? It at least gives four teams a chance. JML897

Please. Think of the kids. They miss more cIasses if they have to play another week.

(brb, adding more teams to the 68-team basketball tournament)

So i was just thinking...............in the real sports we have 30 teams with long schedules AND playoffs. How in the world does anyone think they can take a pool of over 100 teams, have them play a 12 team schedule and somehow come out with the best 2 to play for a championship?? Without a playoff? That's just insane. Doesn't matter what peoples "eyes tell them", perceptions can be wrong.X360PS3AMD05