I don't get why apologists becomes all egalitarian for these top QBs/Hall of Fame guys when they **** up(it's not like we give Romo a pass, and he isn't a guy going to the hall of fame). I understand when hyperbole is involved their failures need the right context, and not knee jerk reactions like "haha sucks, choker, get that scrub outta here" or whatever. But that type of lazy brain narrative works both ways "He's an all time great, how could you say he played poorly"
Peyton Manning has not played well in the playoffs, and has some noteworthy games where their loss is on something bad he did. And against Seattle he played bad. For the record you can do this type of complaining for all the big qbs. I get that there are some double standards that come with this because of recent narratives and how much the QB is talked about. For instance no one really bothers to bring up that for 9 straight years Brady really hasn't done anything in a big game(matter of fact he's played bad in their losses, and he's played bad in the AFC Title games, and at best been par in the superbowls). Or the fact that Brees has also been getting bitch slapped when he gets to the playoffs by physical defenses, and that's if he even makes the playoffs.
I get that, and by no means am I ignoring that all 3 are fantastic hall of fame guys, who belong in a top 10 all time list(well at least peyton and brady, more so brady). But at the same time it's totally fair to hold these guys to their standard. You are great. The team is built around you being great. In a big spot, play great. Peyton Manning(like the rest of the Broncos) didn't. That doesn't mean we absolve him of his share of the blame. Especially with how much more these great Qbs get paid.
As for Peyton's legacy, same as I thought before the game if he had lost. He's not the GOAT, he belongs in the top 10 all time, maybe as high as 4th or 5th. But I wouldn't call him the greatest. And to be fair even if he had won I wouldn't have called him the GOAT.
Log in to comment