[QUOTE="kbaily"][QUOTE="whoozwah"][QUOTE="SuperfastSonic"][QUOTE="kbaily"] [QUOTE="SuperfastSonic"]I'm hoping they do a Sonic-Mario crossover that isn't a dang mini-game compilation!:x Seiously, what the f*** were they thinking?!SuperfastSonic
They wanted to make money.
If they wanted to make money, they could've made something that gaming vets would absolutely love too, instead of just making a casual game. Seems to be the excuse this generation...you seem to indicate that "gaming vets" can't enjoy "casual" games (such an amorphous term). I wonder who it could have been that misguided you into thinking that? As far as I'm concerned, games are games. They're made for entertainment and if you have FUN playing it then who cares if it's for the *shivers* casuals or hardcores?
*note* this mini rant has no actual bearing on my personal opinion of the overall quality or fun factor of MaSatOG. Please do not take it as such.
Because remember "casual gamers are evil scum defiling our sacred priesthood with their lack of taste." Soon our beloved hobby will be overun by old people playing mini games and all the dorky white boys who can't get laid will be forced to leave their homes and get lives.
What a horrible thought.
Coming from someone who played Wii Fit Plus, Nintendogs, Big Brain Academy, Wii Sports and liked them all.
i'm talking about the Third-party developers that made s*** and wii Sports knock-offs. Capcom and SEGA have been loyal, and Square enix has made some "decent" games, but others like Ubi-soft laugh at the Wii and give it shovelware crap that no one would play. and the dumbest excuse is "graphics this! graphics that!" and act like the wii has terrible graphics, when really even though it's not HD, the Wii can support some impressive graphics. Just look at Monster Hunter Tri and SSBB! But for this graphics issue thing they think they have to skip on games that other systems got, and give Wii owners crappy spin-offs. we asked for a Castlevania adventure game, we got a half-a$$ fighter. We ask for soul Calibur IV, we get an adventure game that looks and plays so bad it makes the Soul Calibur universe hide it's head in shame. Nintendo players don't care about graphics. We choose the N64 over the Dreamcast, and the Gamecube over the Xbox. Not because we're stupid, but because we like Mario, Metroid, Zelda, and fun games and want other gaming companies to give us what other console player's get. The Wii held so much promise it's distainful that a lot of companies think they have to give us fling-your-remote-around-the-room games when the Xbox360 and PS3 get more quality games.
I agree with you most of the 3rd party developers that make games for the WII give us s*** games. And i hate the there are so many people that wii Bash because of that and the graphics. The graphics are fine. Now i will say that the PS3 and the 360 are good consoles and there are quite a few games that i really like. but most of these companies are focusing too much on graphic and not the quality of the gameplay. Most of the games nintendo makes have good average graphics but they are real fun to play though. And there are a lot of games on 360 and ps3 that looked good but failed at being any fun at all.
I just wish people would relize this and make better games and focus more on the gameplay rather than how good it looks.
Log in to comment