I played GT5:P, not impressed.

I have just played GT5 prologue and the graphics are not like the screens being shown. I played it at 720P and 1080i and in now way is it as impressive as the photorealistic screens I have seen.

It is a very impressive game but where are the skid marks left by cars after braking hard? where are the sparks when the car bottoms out? The opponents AI is rubbish, they just ram into the back of you without trying to avoid. There really are jaggies everywhere. The courses look good but not a massive jump over a high resolution version of GT4.

The interiors look good but not amazing and the london track for me is a real dissapointment as well

I know its a demo but GT4 turned out to be GT4 prologue with more cars and tracks with no improvement to graphics and AI.

I hate when a game gets massive hype and does not live up to it, hype can really damage a game. This is in no way 4D gaming at all!

A little scan through your posts showed me how much of a lemming you are, always bashing on the PS3 for it's "so called being better than everything" and "only being a way to get Blu-ray into my home".

Your opinion is worth about as much as sand in the desert

Go play some Forza then you XBox fanboy . You'll never know about true racing gamesBrendruis

Anyway, I'll take a look at it when it comes out. But I'd really don't see the point in it (beside being the most expensive Demo ever) I rather have a full racing sim for the PS3 before the year is out.

There really are jaggies everywhere. The courses look good but not a massive jump over a high resolution version of GT4.

Marcbarr1

You must have problems with your set-up because I have no jaggies whatsoever............

Don't see that lots of jaggies anywhere...Are you sure it was GT5 Prologue...

Not the greatest pics from his monitor I know, but after those shots I would definitly say end of story and end of this topic. Awesome looking game and I just can't wait.

360 guys just get worried huh for him to make a thread like this lol.

I have this game on pre-order here in the UK. I'm really looking forward to playing it. They had it on show at the play.com live event in London last weekend and it looked real, real nice.

I've seen the game running and it looks very good. I didn't get to try it out myself but from just watching it being played, this game will be a "must have" for racing fans and it will hold me off until the full version comes out.

I have just played GT5 prologue and the graphics are not like the screens being shown. I played it at 720P and 1080i and in now way is it as impressive as the photorealistic screens I have seen.

It is a very impressive game but where are the skid marks left by cars after braking hard? where are the sparks when the car bottoms out? The opponents AI is rubbish, they just ram into the back of you without trying to avoid. There really are jaggies everywhere. The courses look good but not a massive jump over a high resolution version of GT4.

The interiors look good but not amazing and the london track for me is a real dissapointment as well

I know its a demo but GT4 turned out to be GT4 prologue with more cars and tracks with no improvement to graphics and AI.

I hate when a game gets massive hype and does not live up to it, hype can really damage a game. This is in no way 4D gaming at all!

Marcbarr1

I have just played GT5 prologue and the graphics are not like the screens being shown. I played it at 720P and 1080i and in now way is it as impressive as the photorealistic screens I have seen.

It is a very impressive game but where are the skid marks left by cars after braking hard? where are the sparks when the car bottoms out? The opponents AI is rubbish, they just ram into the back of you without trying to avoid. There really are jaggies everywhere. The courses look good but not a massive jump over a high resolution version of GT4.

The interiors look good but not amazing and the london track for me is a real dissapointment as well

I know its a demo but GT4 turned out to be GT4 prologue with more cars and tracks with no improvement to graphics and AI.

I hate when a game gets massive hype and does not live up to it, hype can really damage a game. This is in no way 4D gaming at all!

Marcbarr1

LMFAO @ 4D comment

Do you even know what 4D is kid??

LMFAO @ 4D comment

Do you even know what 4D is kid??

Denji

He is a kid, he must think that 4D has to do with graphics.

I think GT5 does look good, but I'm sticking with Forza 2. I just don't like hwo the AI in any of the GT games respond, also the 'no damage' thing is pretty pathetic with todays current technology. Like I said, call me a fanboy if you'd like, but I see Forza2 still being the better of the two. Just wish they had a 'in cockpit' veiw like GT5.

But back to the original post.....seriously dude, what jaggies? I don't see anymore jaggies in this game than I do in every other game.

Well hey, the Burnout Paradise demo sucked and the final game is awesome.Rhen_Var

i beg to differ. demo sucked and so does the full game. even when iv logged so many hours into it. too Frustrating for me. but hey, thats a topic for another time.

Not the greatest pics from his monitor I know, but after those shots I would definitly say end of story and end of this topic. Awesome looking game and I just can't wait.

360 guys just get worried huh for him to make a thread like this lol.

cupsta

I was thinking the same thing. Wow.

I played the GT5:P demo from the Japan store months ago. I was not impressed at all. And there were jaggies all over that demo. I was fairly depressed by it, really.

But those off-screen shots look great. No jaggies. if that is the case, I will own this game, without a doubt.

But, how are you playing the game already, TEEDA?

[QUOTE="Denji"]

LMFAO @ 4D comment

Do you even know what 4D is kid??

kenshinhimura16

He is a kid, he must think that 4D has to do with graphics.

I hate when people do that in System Wars too. Its such the baseless comment but they will fight you tooth and nail about it.

I think GT5 does look good, but I'm sticking with Forza 2. I just don't like hwo the AI in any of the GT games respond, also the 'no damage' thing is pretty pathetic with todays current technology. Like I said, call me a fanboy if you'd like, but I see Forza2 still being the better of the two. Just wish they had a 'in cockpit' veiw like GT5.

But back to the original post.....seriously dude, what jaggies? I don't see anymore jaggies in this game than I do in every other game.

boostud

It's not a matter of technology, but no company want so see their 500.000$ car being wrecked in video game. The driving psychics that GT5 will offer is nothing like Forza 2.

In fact Forza 2 damage is good, but doesn't even come close to the realism. Try playing DiRT and Burnout. That's some impressive effect that resemble real crash.

Grand Turismo always provided realism. In picture taken circuits, environments, car crew, car detail to the smallest icon, can handling. (No car in GT feels the same), It complements real life.

GT5 will revolutionize driving as we know it in gaming.

I have just played GT5 prologue and the graphics are not like the screens being shown. I played it at 720P and 1080i and in now way is it as impressive as the photorealistic screens I have seen.

It is a very impressive game but where are the skid marks left by cars after braking hard? where are the sparks when the car bottoms out? The opponents AI is rubbish, they just ram into the back of you without trying to avoid. There really are jaggies everywhere. The courses look good but not a massive jump over a high resolution version of GT4.

The interiors look good but not amazing and the london track for me is a real dissapointment as well

I know its a demo but GT4 turned out to be GT4 prologue with more cars and tracks with no improvement to graphics and AI.

I hate when a game gets massive hype and does not live up to it, hype can really damage a game. This is in no way 4D gaming at all!

You are one in a million. Now out of the 999,999 people who are getting this game does anyone else have jaggies on their version. I downloaded the demo and was impressed. But I cannot seem to recall a time when GT did not impress me.

Marcbarr1

[QUOTE="boostud"]

I think GT5 does look good, but I'm sticking with Forza 2. I just don't like hwo the AI in any of the GT games respond, also the 'no damage' thing is pretty pathetic with todays current technology. Like I said, call me a fanboy if you'd like, but I see Forza2 still being the better of the two. Just wish they had a 'in cockpit' veiw like GT5.

But back to the original post.....seriously dude, what jaggies? I don't see anymore jaggies in this game than I do in every other game.

Sokol4ever

It's not a matter of technology, but no company want so see their 500.000$ car being wrecked in video game. The driving psychics that GT5 will offer is nothing like Forza 2.

In fact Forza 2 damage is good, but doesn't even come close to the realism. Try playing DiRT and Burnout. That's some impressive effect that resemble real crash.

Grand Turismo always provided realism. In picture taken circuits, environments, car crew, car detail to the smallest icon, can handling. (No car in GT feels the same), It complements real life.

GT5 will revolutionize driving as we know it in gaming.

He must be one opf those players that only do up to IB in the licenses and then plays a couple of races, buys some cars and leaves the game. Those of us, who play GT for its realism and cars, normally end up doing the endurance races, and wanted or not, you end up crashing in those races. So if I were to be crashed by an a** as it happens sometimes since the AI in higher races turens more agressive, and my car was to be totaled after 3 hours of racing, how would that feel?-

Well, thats what Poly said, and I understand and accept it. Though they were saying of adding damage too, so who knows. Prologue wasnt going to have all teh features of 5 anyway.

The opponents AI is rubbish, they just ram into the back of you without trying to avoid. Marcbarr1

- agreed!

I think GT5 does look good, but I'm sticking with Forza 2. I just don't like how the AI in any of the GT games respond, but I see Forza2 still being the better of the two. Just wish they had a 'in cockpit' veiw.boostud

- me too, atleast until GT5 (the actual game) comes out...in addition to cockpit views, FM2 & the entire 360 racing games would benefit GREATLY with a wheel like the Logitech DFP not to mention the G25 (drool)!

Anyway, I'll take a look at it when it comes out. But I'd really don't see the point in it (beside being the most expensive Demo ever) I rather have a full racing sim for the PS3.Shattered007

- i hear ya, but there's enough content for fans of the series to get it now...and i'm glad i did!

lol as soon as he said this isnt 4d gaming i new he was a xbox 360 troll bigLLL

[QUOTE="Brendruis"]Go play some Forza then you XBox fanboy . You'll never know about true racing gamesShattered007

Anyway, I'll take a look at it when it comes out. But I'd really don't see the point in it (beside being the most expensive Demo ever) I rather have a full racing sim for the PS3 before the year is out.

The damage is forza is awful. If yor complaining about realism, both games fall way short of realism. Is like me saying 'its funny how you can drive into a wall at 100mph and be racing again in the next race without being dead'

I say this because I know a few people who have made this mistake, but I have to wonder if some of the people here bashing Prologue in terms of visuals are playing GT:HD instead of Prologue.:|

I'm not accusing anyone here of making that mistake, but it's hard for me to imagine someone looking at this game and not being impressed. It's just an incredible looking game, and one that shouldn't be categorized as anything less then.

As far as damage to the cars, while it sucks that it's not there, I would rather wait until they can deliver damage modeling that is up to par with the rest of the game's quality. The damage modeling in "the racing sim of choice for the competition" is good, but it's far from realistic (in terms of how realistic damage in a video game can be), and I would hate to see that sort of damage modeling in Gran Turismo, because, quite frankly, it wouldn't be up to par with the rest of the game.

To be blunt, damage like that would be unfitting of a racer that is of such extreme quality as Gran Turismo is, and until the team at Polyphony is able to meet their own high standards, as well as mine, I don't want them to include it.

As far as sim racers go, you can't beat Gran Turismo. I've played every one of them, as well as "that game from the competition" and there's no comparison in my book. That's not to say that "the other game" isn't good because it is, but Gran Turismo is the defacto racing sim in my opinion, and the place to be if you're a hardcore sim racing fan.

Like it or not, agree or not, that's my opinion.;)

I say this because I know a few people who have made this mistake, but I have to wonder if some of the people here bashing Prologue in terms of visuals are playing GT:HD instead of Prologue.:|

I'm not accusing anyone here of making that mistake, but it's hard for me to imagine someone looking at this game and not being impressed. It's just an incredible looking game, and one that shouldn't be categorized as anything less then.

As far as damage to the cars, while it sucks that it's not there, I would rather wait until they can deliver damage modeling that is up to par with the rest of the game's quality. The damage modeling in "the racing sim of choice for the competition" is good, but it's far from realistic (in terms of how realistic damage in a video game can be), and I would hate to see that sort of damage modeling in Gran Turismo, because, quite frankly, it wouldn't be up to par with the rest of the game.

To be blunt, damage like that would be unfitting of a racer that is of such extreme quality as Gran Turismo is, and until the team at Polyphony is able to meet their own high standards, as well as mine, I don't want them to include it.

As far as sim racers go, you can't beat Gran Turismo. I've played every one of them, as well as "that game from the competition" and there's no comparison in my book. That's not to say that "the other game" isn't good because it is, but Gran Turismo is the defacto racing sim in my opinion, and the place to be if you're a hardcore sim racing fan.

Like it or not, agree or not, that's my opinion.;)

nyc05

I completely agree. Excellent post--you always have good things to say. Kudos.

Btw, here's proof if someone doesn't believe me...

Btw, here's proof if someone doesn't believe me...

BioShockOwnz

Oh I found that on Google also.

Yeah, it doesn't blow me away, either. I'm running it on 1080p through HDMI and it looks nice, but it's just not as great as some of the screens lead you to believe.BioShockOwnz

Some screen shots would be nice.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Btw, here's proof if someone doesn't believe me...

truenextgen

Oh I found that on Google also.

Um, my post I just made is behind it on the computer screen...:|

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Btw, here's proof if someone doesn't believe me...

truenextgen

Oh I found that on Google also.

Here's another for truenextgen...

I should of known if I posted Bio would be right behind me LOL Just kidding. Come on I know you game by now dude. And You know I know it, thats the sad part.truenextgen

Huh? Please explain. There's no reason to be defensive just because we can't all agree on something. Can't you have a discussion without calling people names? You said you get modded because you defend something. Well, when you defend something by calling names, then only bad things come out of it. Gamespot mods don't put up with name calling. I've proven to you that I own it and I didn't say anything bad about it. It's a decent game. I just said it doesn't look as good as some of the bullshots, that's all. :)

A little scan through your posts showed me how much of a lemming you are, always bashing on the PS3 for it's "so called being better than everything" and "only being a way to get Blu-ray into my home".

Your opinion is worth about as much as sand in the desert

jonnyt61

I for one value sand in a desert very much! It would not be a desert without sand!

But I would like to see skid marks and sparks. No damage is GT, just like idiot guards with question marks over their heads is MGS. But skid marks would be nice for once.

A little scan through your posts showed me how much of a lemming you are, always bashing on the PS3 for it's "so called being better than everything" and "only being a way to get Blu-ray into my home".

Your opinion is worth about as much as sand in the desert

jonnyt61

[QUOTE="jonnyt61"]

A little scan through your posts showed me how much of a lemming you are, always bashing on the PS3 for it's "so called being better than everything" and "only being a way to get Blu-ray into my home".

Your opinion is worth about as much as sand in the desert

AliasUK

I for one value sand in a desert very much! It would not be a desert without sand!

But I would like to see skid marks and sparks. No damage is GT, just like idiot guards with question marks over their heads is MGS. But skid marks would be nice for once.

HEY!!! this is not about MGS and dont you dare say anything about MGS