Most disappointed game for 2011?

It would have to be Rage for me.

Brink or bulletstorm.

BF3 then a close second brink

AC:R, Dragon Age 2, Need For Speed The Run, Test Drive Unlimited 2 and Duke Nukem Forever

batman arkham city.

absolutely loved the first but try as i might i just couldn't get into the sequel

Most disappointing? Dragon Age 2.

Other runner-ups include Rage and Crysis 2.

Crysis 2 & Dragon Age 2.

Those are the two games that I anticipated/expected to be good, but ended up dissapointing me.

Crysis 2. Too much Call of Duty and not enough Crysis in there.

Rage,was very sad when I saw how bad the game was,plus the PC version was a horrible port...

BF3 is also on the list,EA made too many dumb decisions that turned me away from buying the game completely(Origin spyware,browser-based menus,switching from PC to console as a main development platform in the middle of production,etc)

BF3, Brink and Crysis 2. Brink was the worst but was the one I expected the least from, so probably BF3 was the biggest dissapoint followed by Crysis 2.

DA2 for me

RAGE, major let down on how the PC version turned out.

I'm more of a RPG player, so it has to be DA2. They got rid of all the stuff that made it a great PC game, and even on console it wasn't all that good. I thought Bioware might fix it up with a lot of patches, but they pretty much abandoned it after release. Sure, they released a few DLC but almostno patches for the base game.

MW3, not much to say, SP was short, game feels too old, and a developer that asks users to upvote their product because its metacritic score was horrible is pathetic. Crysis 2, not because the game was bad, but the incredible lack of patching and support.

Dragon Age 2.

RAGE, BF3 and Crysis 2 where HUGE disappointments for me.

RAGE, BF3 and Crysis 2 where HUGE disappointments for me.

pelvist

Amen, brotha. No really good fps this year.

DA2.

I'm more of a RPG player, so it has to be DA2. They got rid of all the stuff that made it a great PC game, and even on console it wasn't all that good. I thought Bioware might fix it up with a lot of patches, but they pretty much abandoned it after release. Sure, they released a few DLC but almostno patches for the base game.

James00715

Ironically, Duke Nukem Forever met my expectations, even moreso than games like Battlefield 3 did.

1.DA2

2. TOR

1.DA2

2. TOR

Mr_Ditters

Crysis2 probably. Not a bad game but not what I was expecting after playing Crysis 1.

Rage and Red Faction: Armageddon.

BF 3 is in its current state worse than BC 2, but I still have faint hope it will be fixed.

[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

1.DA2

2. TOR

Elann2008

I come from a background of playing SWG, EVE, and Ultima Online. Those are the only mmo's that could capture my attention. I prefer a sandbox experience--freedom, complexity, custimizability, player created content. TOR just seemed like more of the same kind of themepark MMO that I have seen again and again. My love of star wars wasn't enough to make me love that game. I found completing the missions and listening to the dialog tedious. I wanted to skip through it all.

To put it bluntly: too simplistic.

Its a preference thing. I understand why they made it the way they did--its just not for me, but being a huge fan of Star Wars I was disappointed. It would be my #1 disappointment except for the fact that I found DA2 to be so abysmally bad that it earned my #1 slot.

No I got to level 20 ish I think. I don't need to go further. My problem with it isn't a level thing; its from the ground up.

[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

1.DA2

2. TOR

Mr_Ditters

I come from a background of playing SWG, EVE, and Ultima Online. Those are the only mmo's that could capture my attention. I prefer a sandbox experience--freedom, complexity, custimizability, player created content. TOR just seemed like more of the same kind of themepark MMO that I have seen again and again. My love of star wars wasn't enough to make me love that game. I found completing the missions and listening to the dialog tedious. I wanted to skip through it all.

To put it bluntly: too simplistic.

Its a preference thing. I understand why they made it the way they did--its just not for me, but being a huge fan of Star Wars I was disappointed. It would be my #1 disappointment except for the fact that I found DA2 to be so abysmally bad that it earned my #1 slot.

No I got to level 20 ish I think. I don't need to go further. My problem with it isn't a level thing; its from the ground up.

I'd have to say BF3 from what I've heard from my friends. I'm so glad that I didn't fall for their peer pressure. I didn't care for the beta, but they all bought it when they came out, they played it for about a week, but have yet to touch it since.

Battlefield 3.

I'd have to say BF3 from what I've heard from my friends. I'm so glad that I didn't fall for their peer pressure. I didn't care for the beta, but they all bought it when they came out, they played it for about a week, but have yet to touch it since.

Cwagmire21

Story of my life. Bugs overwhelming is pretty much what stopped me from bothering with it.

[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]

I'd have to say BF3 from what I've heard from my friends. I'm so glad that I didn't fall for their peer pressure. I didn't care for the beta, but they all bought it when they came out, they played it for about a week, but have yet to touch it since.

GD1551

Story of my life. Bugs overwhelming is pretty much what stopped me from bothering with it.

[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]

I'd have to say BF3 from what I've heard from my friends. I'm so glad that I didn't fall for their peer pressure. I didn't care for the beta, but they all bought it when they came out, they played it for about a week, but have yet to touch it since.

GD1551

Story of my life. Bugs overwhelming is pretty much what stopped me from bothering with it.

I was disappointed with BF3 but probably because my expectations were too high.

After playing it some more and thinking about it, I consider it the best online shooter in existence--in spite of its flaws and what it could have been.

Whats better?

[QUOTE="GD1551"]

[QUOTE="Cwagmire21"]

I'd have to say BF3 from what I've heard from my friends. I'm so glad that I didn't fall for their peer pressure. I didn't care for the beta, but they all bought it when they came out, they played it for about a week, but have yet to touch it since.

Mr_Ditters

Story of my life. Bugs overwhelming is pretty much what stopped me from bothering with it.

I was disappointed with BF3 but probably because my expectations were too high.

After playing it some more and thinking about it, I consider it the best online shooter in existence--in spite of its flaws and what it could have been.

Whats better?

[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

[QUOTE="GD1551"]

Story of my life. Bugs overwhelming is pretty much what stopped me from bothering with it.

FelipeInside

I was disappointed with BF3 but probably because my expectations were too high.

After playing it some more and thinking about it, I consider it the best online shooter in existence--in spite of its flaws and what it could have been.

Whats better?

Im not sure what you mean by that. How about some specifics?

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

I was disappointed with BF3 but probably because my expectations were too high.

After playing it some more and thinking about it, I consider it the best online shooter in existence--in spite of its flaws and what it could have been.

Whats better?

Mr_Ditters

Im not sure what you mean by that. How about some specifics?

[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"] Call of Duty in "SOME PARTS" Read: some parts.FelipeInside

Im not sure what you mean by that. How about some specifics?

I have experienced some of the problems with BF3. The game would crash while switching maps. It was fixed with the last update. There are little issues that annoy me. I havent had the issues with hit detection like I had with BC2. The game seems to perform well enough on a ATI 4890 which is a couple of years old ($200 when I bought it July 2009). Even if COD is more polished, I still prefer BF3. I like COD, but I prefer BF3. There is just so much more going on--tanks, jets, choppers, all of the bells and whistles, huge maps.

COD is nice for when you have small chunks of time. You can sit down, play a few rounds and rank up. BF3 is great for when you have hours of free time and can squad up with your friends and win a huge battle.

Ive been playing RO2 lately. That game is a mess but there is something about it. It has a lot of potential even though it was released as a disaster. The modding community could turn that into the best fps alive.

Brink, Duke, DA 2 ... the Holy Fail Trinity of 2011 ...

COD fails for the simple reason of kill streaks. Most of the time you're not doing the killing but instead it's a helicoptor 100 feet in the air. It's a good game for consolities who can't aim properly on a gamepad but it's a terrible PC FPS.

COD fails for the simple reason of kill streaks. Most of the time you're not doing the killing but instead it's a helicoptor 100 feet in the air. It's a good game for consolities who can't aim properly on a gamepad but it's a terrible PC FPS.

ShimmerMan

So when you play BF3 in a helicopter, it isn't you either doing the killing?

Oh, that's why there are professional tournaments on PC?

I don't play BF. But I assume in BF it's a player controlling the movement of the helicoptor and not the cpu. MW you simply point and click whilst the cpu rotates around the map, and it's very easy to get kills. Also some of the air support you don't even have to aim.

And also there's tournaments for loads of crappy games. Doesn't really mean anything except those games are popular and score a high amount of viewers.