Ghosts just became AWESOME !!!

Sorry that I can't be on 24/7 to instantly respond to your stupidity. You'll just have to wait until my mental faculties recover enough to actually process the nonsense that's posted under your name.

No one here forgets that. Except maybe Felipe who probably praised the game as the second coming of Jesus.

I think we are up to number 53 with reading problems from you.

Go back and read my posts, I said that Blops1 had an awful launch and was unplayable at release.

It's easy to win arguments when you don't read the other poster's points.

I guess everyone is having reading comprehension problems lately.

You do realize that at no point did I defend the actual port. I even said I wanted regretted buying the game because of the performance issues.

My post was about the new modes, which are good and fun and to all those people that say COD never brings anything new.

The port should of been better but at least now it's fixed a bit with the patch.

Everyone praises BF4 but their launch was bad too (port wise)

I have a question about needing the six gb ram but I only got four right now. is it doable or no?

I'm just concerned that they're "wagging the dog" so to speak.

They're social engineering consumer behavior and expectations, such that instead of expecting a solid game that you can play for years, from the minute you buy a CoD you're on a subscription timer.

Map pack hits? You either buy it or get left behind.

New CoD hits? You either buy it or get left behind.

I understand there's still people playing older CoD's with no map packs and no dlc.

I'm just saying the developer is pushing a quasi-subscription model AND at the same time drowning out their competition through volume.

If you're busy buying CoD every year, there's not gonna be much left in your wallet for other FPS.

So they're starving their competators, some of whom might offer innovation and better ideas.

At the end of the day, if the game is fun, you're gonna play it, no arguments there. I'm just eloquating my point of view about CoD and its effects on gaming and the industry as a whole.

If you're gonna play CoD, at least play it on a console so you don't shit in the PC pool.

But I can't aim with a controller and don't have a console.....lololololol

I agree on some of your points.

Of course they try to drown their competitors, which big company doesn't.

If you don't buy the map packs, you don't get left behind. Lots of people actually don't buy map packs cause they dont think it's worth it.

As for newer CODs, well....that happens with everything. But there are people still playing Blops1 and 2 for example.

Sadly that's the way the industry works now....with microtransactions, DLC and pay to win models.

I play COD cause it's fun basically.

It is doable, but not possible. The game has a error message telling you that you do not have 6GB of RAM and the game will not launch. Waste of money, so don't purchase it. There is a RAM Fix hack that lets you play the single player, but lets be honest no one buys CoD for SP I imagine.

Oh man, I remember a time when people did buy COD for the singleplayer

I still replay CoD 1/UO for that every once in a while

CoD2 was the shit.

So I think we've discovered why this port blows so monumentally hard: Their own developers have the same arguments/knowledge of a System Wars troll

"But wait" you, say..." Anyone could name themselves [IW] and claim to be a dev!" Very true...except this guy is legit. Here's why http://i1.minus.com/ibf8jztQ9ckOJ2.jpg

I'm enjoying the campaign even though it's the usual COD campaign, but I have yet to start multiplayer.

Shhh....don't say you are enjoying COD, it's not allowed around these parts.

i'm not anti-COD. i'm anti-boredom. i used to love COD back in the days.

I probably wasn't referring to you.

Ohh crap I better hide for a bit before they noticed that comment!

I have Ghosts, and can't really play it. It looks terrible with low settings, and all I have at the moment is a laptop with a 5870m in it (the minimum requiremed GPU to play). It's smooth, but only with low settings at 1080p. Otherwise the game is good. The maps are cool, they're using the tried, tested and true CoD formula, good gameplay, etc. People who hate on the game saying it's "recycled" aren't worth listening to - this is a franchise with an established model, and there's no need to totally revamp it just for the sake of being "innovative" according to their definition of the word. I've never played WoW, and have no intention of doing do, but I would never dis the game's subsequent add-ons (or whatever they're called) for being regurgitation of previous offerings. If you don't like CoD, fine. Don't like FPS? Also fine. Are you terrible at these types of games? No problem. Do you abhor video game violence and enjoy Sesame Street? Cool. But hating on the game for building on a model of success and maintaining a high degree of gameplay continuity is moronic.

I'll have new hardware by the end of the month and hopefully then I can enjoy the game. Lots of gamers I've spoken to also tell me they have performance issues with the game.

Ghosts is god awful. This coming from a long time CoD fan. The series has gotten progressively worse since Modern Warfare, and Ghosts might be the worst of them all. If you've played BF4 you know it shits all over CoD Ghosts.

@Zoso813: You speaking for the SP, MP, or both?