3850x3 = 24909 3dmark06

3850x3 card makes 24909 3dmark06

http://technewstime.com/hardware-news/3850x3-benchmarked

I dont care.Musacircuit_2

I knew that was coming :P

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.JSDempsey

I knew that was coming :P

I dont care.Musacircuit_2

Official 3DMark '06 PCHW Scores thread has 87 pages that disagree with you.

I dont care.Musacircuit_2

Your such a little fanboy. I bet if it was the NVIDIA 9600gx2 you would.

Sometimes there is a big difference in 06 marks and actual game performance...

And I don't care either....

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="teddyrob"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.Alejo17

Official 3DMark '06 PCHW Scores thread has 87 pages that disagree with you.

lol musa cracks me up, fanboy ftw...

loooool, i saw that coming too specially from musa, wow its amazing how retarded he is

ROFL musa your such a fanboy, it astounds me... i can't even put it into words (well without getting banned anyway)

not bad, but how does it fare at real games? not synthetic benches

I'm waiting for the next ati 4xxx or nvidia G100 cards :) = true next gen.

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.nVidiaGaMer

That makes your 8800GTX look like a toy.

And my Geforce 2 Ultra look like dust ... :cry:

not bad, but how does it fare at real games? not synthetic benchesperfect_chao

I imagine possible similar to a 3870x2 + 3850 card.

http://www.legitreviews.com/article/671/6/

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.Baselerd

Your such a little fanboy. I bet if it was the NVIDIA 9600gx2 you would.

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.Musacircuit_2

That makes your 8800GTX look like a toy.

And my Geforce 2 Ultra look like dust ... :cry:

i sold my 8800 GTX to get 2 8800 GT's and the speedboost was nice overall.. better than a 3850x2 aswell, x2 cards from nvidia and ATI have lower clock speed than 2 physical cards.

Still, not bad.. but who plays crysis? its a terribly optimized game

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.perfect_chao

That makes your 8800GTX look like a toy.

And my Geforce 2 Ultra look like dust ... :cry:

i sold my 8800 GTX to get 2 8800 GT's and the speedboost was nice overall.. better than a 3850x2 aswell, x2 cards from nvidia and ATI have lower clock speed than 2 physical cards.

Still, not bad.. but who plays crysis? its a terribly optimized game

[QUOTE="teddyrob"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.Musacircuit_2

Official 3DMark '06 PCHW Scores thread has 87 pages that disagree with you.

Well 3Dmark is a very accurate way of benchmark performance, *BUT, games dont utilice GPU in the same way as many games were produced to play at certin cards. (nvidia)

Here is a Q for you musa:

ATI´s hardware is good, but the lack of intrest in game-development make there good hardware a little less apealing, but well.. I don´t blame ATI for not pumping money in game development. Sure, nvidia has there advance, they have a good solid conetion with most game developers, but thats realy not ATI´s fault.

If I were you i´d try withdraw the fan-boy´ism and face reality. ATi is here to stay with or without your negative responce of there hardware.

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="teddyrob"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.swehunt

Official 3DMark '06 PCHW Scores thread has 87 pages that disagree with you.

Well 3Dmark is a very accurate way of benchmark performance, *BUT, games dont utilice GPU in the same way as many games were produced to play at certin cards. (nvidia)

Here is a Q for you musa:

ATI´s hardware is good, but the lack of intrest in game-development make there good hardware a little less apealing, but well.. I don´t blame ATI for not pumping money in game development. Sure, nvidia has there advance, they have a good solid conetion with most game developers, but thats realy not ATI´s fault.

If I were you i´d try withdraw the fan-boy´ism and face reality. ATi is here to stay with or without your negative responce of there hardware.

That is soooo true ATI doesnt connects very well with game developers dunno why, thats why all games are Nvidia Its the way to be played

[QUOTE="swehunt"][QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="teddyrob"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.Alejo17

Official 3DMark '06 PCHW Scores thread has 87 pages that disagree with you.

Well 3Dmark is a very accurate way of benchmark performance, *BUT, games dont utilice GPU in the same way as many games were produced to play at certin cards. (nvidia)

Here is a Q for you musa:

ATI´s hardware is good, but the lack of intrest in game-development make there good hardware a little less apealing, but well.. I don´t blame ATI for not pumping money in game development. Sure, nvidia has there advance, they have a good solid conetion with most game developers, but thats realy not ATI´s fault.

If I were you i´d try withdraw the fan-boy´ism and face reality. ATi is here to stay with or without your negative responce of there hardware.

That is soooo true ATI doesnt connects very well with game developers dunno why, thats why all games are Nvidia Its the way to be played

Yes, their hardware is good but I believe they don't have the money to pay in those big quantity as nvidia does.? well just a guess..

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.Musacircuit_2

That makes your 8800GTX look like a toy.

And my Geforce 2 Ultra look like dust ... :cry:

Why throw in the least optimized game? In F.E.A.R the HD3850 X3 will surely get double the fps of your 8800GTX.

Ya let's have some crysis benchmarks than we will see.Musacircuit_2

Hmmm... so 3dMark06 benches don't mean anything but Crysis benchmarks do?
Contradict yourself much?

i sold my 8800 GTX to get 2 8800 GT's and the speedboost was nice overall.. better than a 3850x2 aswell, x2 cards from nvidia and ATI have lower clock speed than 2 physical cards.

Still, not bad.. but who plays crysis? its a terribly optimized gameperfect_chao

Yes, their hardware is good but I believe they don't have the money to pay in those big quantity as nvidia does.? well just a guess..swehunt

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.nVidiaGaMer

That makes your 8800GTX look like a toy.

And my Geforce 2 Ultra look like dust ... :cry:

Why throw in the least optimized game? In F.E.A.R the HD3850 X3 will surely get double the fps of your 8800GTX.

I am soooooo sick of 3dmark and it's useless scores it's not even funny.:|Musacircuit_2

Impressive nonetheless.

[QUOTE="swehunt"]Yes, their hardware is good but I believe they don't have the money to pay in those big quantity as nvidia does.? well just a guess..LordEC911

My guess is that ATI cant raise the large amount for sponsoring as nvidia can pay/give.

The money and hardware are in use for game developers to get a actual game working.

I explained in my erlier post.

____________________________________________________________________

After your edit of your post I nead to re-frase some things:

LordEC911 wrote:"Nvidia has more money than AMD? That is laughable."

Well that´s true but AMD/ATI were ATI alone when all games out today were made/developed, sure maybe we´ll see a change in the way GFX manufactuers sponsor things but don´t expect it to be in a near future.

My guess is that ATI cant raise the large amount for sponsoring as nvidia can pay/give.

The money and hardware are in use for game developers to get a actual game working.

"nvidia, play as it´s ment to be played."

I explained in my erlier post.swehunt

So you think Nvidia has more money than AMD?
AMD/ATi has relationships with most of the developers, it is just that Nvidia spends a ridiculous amount of money/time.

[QUOTE="swehunt"]My guess is that ATI cant raise the large amount for sponsoring as nvidia can pay/give.

The money and hardware are in use for game developers to get a actual game working.

"nvidia, play as it´s ment to be played."

I explained in my erlier post.LordEC911

So you think Nvidia has more money than AMD?
AMD/ATi has relationships with most of the developers, it is just that Nvidia spends a ridiculous amount of money/time.

:P there are many cross post here.. :P read my previous post.

[QUOTE="JSDempsey"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.Musacircuit_2

I knew that was coming :P

3dmark06 doesn't mean a lot if one system beats another by a small amount, like 1000. But it can give you a general idea of where your PC stands. If something beats something else by 10,000, chances are that it is better overall.

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="JSDempsey"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.McJugga

I knew that was coming :P

3dmark06 doesn't mean a lot if one system beats another by a small amount, like 1000. But it can give you a general idea of where your PC stands. If something beats something else by 10,000, chances are that it is better overall.

Adding onto that, chances are that if Musa said it it's probably not worth reading.

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="JSDempsey"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.McJugga

I knew that was coming :P

3dmark06 doesn't mean a lot if one system beats another by a small amount, like 1000. But it can give you a general idea of where your PC stands. If something beats something else by 10,000, chances are that it is better overall.

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"][QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="Musacircuit_2"]I dont care.Sprozelth

That makes your 8800GTX look like a toy.

And my Geforce 2 Ultra look like dust ... :cry:

Why throw in the least optimized game? In F.E.A.R the HD3850 X3 will surely get double the fps of your 8800GTX.

LOL I'm an nVidia fan and even I can point out that. :D

I've been a fan since the Geforce 2 then I got Geforce 5500 then Geforce 7600 and now a 8800GS but I'm going to buy a HD4XXX!

LOL I'm an nVidia fan and even I can point out that. :D

I've been a fan since the Geforce 2 then I got Geforce 5500 then Geforce 7600 and now a 8800GS but I'm going to buy a HD4XXX!

nVidiaGaMer

Its not even out yet, how do you know it will be worth getting...

[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

LOL I'm an nVidia fan and even I can point out that. :D

I've been a fan since the Geforce 2 then I got Geforce 5500 then Geforce 7600 and now a 8800GS but I'm going to buy a HD4XXX!

darkplayer

Its not even out yet, how do you know it will be worth getting...

based on the rumors and whatnot, apparently it will be the thing that puts AMD back on the top... again just rumors and i dont like basing products off of rumors.

[QUOTE="darkplayer"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

LOL I'm an nVidia fan and even I can point out that. :D

I've been a fan since the Geforce 2 then I got Geforce 5500 then Geforce 7600 and now a 8800GS but I'm going to buy a HD4XXX!

Lilgunney612

Its not even out yet, how do you know it will be worth getting...

based on the rumors and whatnot, apparently it will be the thing that puts AMD back on the top... again just rumors and i dont like basing products off of rumors.

Yeah thats what was being said about the 2900XT, and we know how that turned out...

I belive intel is the reason why nvidia is doing so well.. When nvidia splits from intel then we would be not useing nvidia anymore, actually we wont be useing ATI for that matter because I believe intel will beat all of those companies. Though time will only tell. so it would be like old times... AMD ATI NVDIA as allies.TrooperManaic

WHAT?

[QUOTE="darkplayer"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

LOL I'm an nVidia fan and even I can point out that. :D

I've been a fan since the Geforce 2 then I got Geforce 5500 then Geforce 7600 and now a 8800GS but I'm going to buy a HD4XXX!

Lilgunney612

Its not even out yet, how do you know it will be worth getting...

based on the rumors and whatnot, apparently it will be the thing that puts AMD back on the top... again just rumors and i dont like basing products off of rumors.

The 2900XTX was also a rumor puting ATI king... but that never happened did it?

[QUOTE="TrooperManaic"]I belive intel is the reason why nvidia is doing so well.. When nvidia splits from intel then we would be not useing nvidia anymore, actually we wont be useing ATI for that matter because I believe intel will beat all of those companies. Though time will only tell. so it would be like old times... AMD ATI NVDIA as allies.Bebi_vegeta

WHAT?

Yea, what are you talking about?Amd owns ati. There the same company. And why the hell would intel have anything to do with it? Intels processors used to suck for gaming and nvidia was still good.

Wow, all of you are just fanboys, ALL of you. Yeah Ati is closer working with AMD, but nvidia is more associated with intel, which is the leading CPU company, by FAR.Menfear

ATI is AMD and nVidia is still equally associated with both.

and how many frames in crysis 3d mark = blaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa its pointless you can have a huge 3d mark score and bad in game frame ratesimprezawrx500

nobody cares about crysis.

Why would anybody keep their rig like that anyway?

In real games you won't see any difference if your rig is already the nuts .

[QUOTE="imprezawrx500"]and how many frames in crysis 3d mark = blaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa its pointless you can have a huge 3d mark score and bad in game frame ratesMcJugga

nobody cares about crysis.

ATI card + crysis = unfair comparisson versus Nvidia card.

And people do care about crysis, because people also beleived the world was flat not so long ago in our short history.

[QUOTE="Menfear"]Wow, all of you are just fanboys, ALL of you. Yeah Ati is closer working with AMD, but nvidia is more associated with intel, which is the leading CPU company, by FAR.darkplayer

ATI is AMD and nVidia is still equally associated with both.

Oh, they've merged? well of course..

Wow, all of you are just fanboys, ALL of you. Yeah Ati is closer working with AMD, but nvidia is more associated with intel, which is the leading CPU company, by FAR.Menfear

Actually, I would have to say that Intel is closer with AMD/ATi than they are with Nvidia...
Have you heard what has been happening recently?