WTF?! A freaking tank? Really?

  • 88 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for keech
keech

1451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#51 keech
Member since 2003 • 1451 Posts

I've only lived in AZ for a few months now. Yet despite that, I'm not terribly surprised. :lol:

New Mexico, Nevada, and Cali are facepalming themselves right now for sharing a border with AZ.

Avatar image for TheNewEraIcon
TheNewEraIcon

12196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#52 TheNewEraIcon
Member since 2009 • 12196 Posts

Hehe a tank for cock fighting, lol that gave me a good chuckle.That'd be a sight to behold! :lol:

Avatar image for disharmonized
disharmonized

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 disharmonized
Member since 2010 • 1051 Posts
Now zombies are fighting crime? Finally.
Avatar image for The_Sand_Man
The_Sand_Man

6788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 The_Sand_Man
Member since 2008 • 6788 Posts

A tank, Steven Seagal.. WHAT? :lol:I don't even..

Avatar image for DJ419
DJ419

1016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 DJ419
Member since 2005 • 1016 Posts

For those that are not familiar with the citizens of Arizona, everyone and their mother owns a gun. The fact the sherrif likes to use his tank at any opportunity does not surprise me.

Avatar image for raiden509
raiden509

3181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 raiden509
Member since 2006 • 3181 Posts
So is the Onion publishing their articles on local news websites now ?
Avatar image for darthkaiser
Darthkaiser

12447

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#58 Darthkaiser
Member since 2006 • 12447 Posts
Only in America
Avatar image for DigitalExile
DigitalExile

16046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 DigitalExile
Member since 2008 • 16046 Posts

It's only bad ass if he was blasting Waterloo...

Avatar image for CoolSkAGuy
CoolSkAGuy

9665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 CoolSkAGuy
Member since 2006 • 9665 Posts

I think every crime should be buster by a tank :lol:

Avatar image for raven28256
raven28256

6072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#62 raven28256
Member since 2005 • 6072 Posts

It wasn't a tank. It was an M113, which despite the fact that it has tracks, is NOT a tank. It is an APC, designed to carry troops (Or in this case, SWAT operators) into action without fear of small arms fire. I'm pretty sure that most people just saw it and instantly labeled it a tank. Hell, the ones used by SWAT won't even have the M2 machine gun or ATGMs on it, the only weapons that the vehicle typically carries when used as a transport. Remember, this is the news, they are hardly experts on military hardware. These are the same people who will say that a suspect had a "heavy caliber machine gun pistol" when they were carrying a 9mm Glock 26, or a ".50 caliber automatic machine gun" when the suspect was using a Ruger Mini-14 or a "military-grade heavy assault rifle" when the suspect was using a cheap Chinese knock-off of an M1 Garand. Yes, these were all real examples taken straight from news broadcasts.

That said, this was obviously a massive publicity stunt for Segal's new show. SWAT only brings out M113s when they are presented with a situation like, say, the The North Hollywood Shootoutor a raid on a site with major gang activity where resistance is very possible. The proper response to this would have been a handful of "normal" cops and something like a SWAT team in a BearCat. After all, this guy was into cockfighting, and cockfighting is often associated with gangs so there was the possibility that maybe the guy had some armed gang members hanging around. This, however, was a blatant misuse of police resources and would have NEVER happened if Steven Segal wasn't in on it. This was clearly just a publicity stunt set up by him, and it is disgusting that the police went along with it.

Avatar image for On3ShotOneKill
On3ShotOneKill

1219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 On3ShotOneKill
Member since 2008 • 1219 Posts
[QUOTE="raven28256"]

It wasn't a tank. It was an M113, which despite the fact that it has tracks, is NOT a tank. It is an APC, designed to carry troops (Or in this case, SWAT operators) into action without fear of small arms fire. I'm pretty sure that most people just saw it and instantly labeled it a tank. Hell, the ones used by SWAT won't even have the M2 machine gun or ATGMs on it, the only weapons that the vehicle typically carries when used as a transport. Remember, this is the news, they are hardly experts on military hardware. These are the same people who will say that a suspect had a "heavy caliber machine gun pistol" when they were carrying a 9mm Glock 26, or a ".50 caliber automatic machine gun" when the suspect was using a Ruger Mini-14 or a "military-grade heavy assault rifle" when the suspect was using a cheap Chinese knock-off of an M1 Garand. Yes, these were all real examples taken straight from news broadcasts.

That said, this was obviously a massive publicity stunt for Segal's new show. SWAT only brings out M113s when they are presented with a situation like, say, the The North Hollywood Shootoutor a raid on a site with major gang activity where resistance is very possible. The proper response to this would have been a handful of "normal" cops and something like a SWAT team in a BearCat. After all, this guy was into cockfighting, and cockfighting is often associated with gangs so there was the possibility that maybe the guy had some armed gang members hanging around. This, however, was a blatant misuse of police resources and would have NEVER happened if Steven Segal wasn't in on it. This was clearly just a publicity stunt set up by him, and it is disgusting that the police went along with it.

Thank you, I was just going to post the same kind of thing correcting the people on GS who aren't exactly militarily knowledgeable
Avatar image for FFCYAN
FFCYAN

4969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#64 FFCYAN
Member since 2005 • 4969 Posts

Maybe they were worried that the suspect would unleash a horde of fighting mad cocks on them?xaos
If The Legend of Zelda taught me anything, it's to not mess with chickens.

As a resident of Arizona, I found this article quite humorous.:lol:

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
lol a tank?
Avatar image for linkin_guy109
linkin_guy109

8864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#66 linkin_guy109
Member since 2005 • 8864 Posts

[QUOTE="MrMe1000"]

Was it a tank or an APC.

Pirate700

Probably the latter as law enforcement doesn't have access to tanks. The writer probably saw a SWAT APC and wanted to make the news.

still...an APC is way overkill for taking down someone who was just cockfighting...
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

SWAT doesn't have tanks...wut?

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

It wasn't a tank. It was an M113, which despite the fact that it has tracks, is NOT a tank. It is an APC, designed to carry troops (Or in this case, SWAT operators) into action without fear of small arms fire. I'm pretty sure that most people just saw it and instantly labeled it a tank. Hell, the ones used by SWAT won't even have the M2 machine gun or ATGMs on it, the only weapons that the vehicle typically carries when used as a transport. Remember, this is the news, they are hardly experts on military hardware. These are the same people who will say that a suspect had a "heavy caliber machine gun pistol" when they were carrying a 9mm Glock 26, or a ".50 caliber automatic machine gun" when the suspect was using a Ruger Mini-14 or a "military-grade heavy assault rifle" when the suspect was using a cheap Chinese knock-off of an M1 Garand. Yes, these were all real examples taken straight from news broadcasts.

That said, this was obviously a massive publicity stunt for Segal's new show. SWAT only brings out M113s when they are presented with a situation like, say, the The North Hollywood Shootoutor a raid on a site with major gang activity where resistance is very possible. The proper response to this would have been a handful of "normal" cops and something like a SWAT team in a BearCat. After all, this guy was into cockfighting, and cockfighting is often associated with gangs so there was the possibility that maybe the guy had some armed gang members hanging around. This, however, was a blatant misuse of police resources and would have NEVER happened if Steven Segal wasn't in on it. This was clearly just a publicity stunt set up by him, and it is disgusting that the police went along with it.

raven28256
Called it. If it's big, loud, has treads, and isn't a construction vehicle, most people will just straight up call it a tank.
Avatar image for SoulRose
SoulRose

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 SoulRose
Member since 2006 • 57 Posts

I would bring a tank to a cockfight too.gotta keep my ass covered.

Avatar image for IcyToasters
IcyToasters

12476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 IcyToasters
Member since 2007 • 12476 Posts

SWAT has APCs.
They might as well use them for transport when they're going on a call for as much safety as they'd hopefully ever need.

Knocking down a wall instead of raiding the house alone with SWAT members, and having "dozens" of SWAT members seems a bit unneeded though. :P

Either way, I don't see a huge deal, other than they could have damaged property and found out he wasn't guilty.

I don't see how it could have costed "tens of thousands of dollars". It can't be that expensive to euthenize chickens, put gas into your APC, and put on your riot gear that you already owned. Unless they're counting the cost of the wall.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Its probley was an apc

I highly doubt swat has acess to a m1a2 or a bradley

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#72 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts
It's so stupid, but in a way, surprisingly awesome.
Avatar image for Urworstnhtmare
Urworstnhtmare

2630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#73 Urworstnhtmare
Member since 2008 • 2630 Posts

[QUOTE="Deihjan"]How about animal police? Will they get tanks too?GabuEx

**** yeah, everyone gets tanks. Can you imagine if you're speeding and a ****ing tank rolls up behind you and tells you to cut that **** out? You'd never speed again.

They would be great for roadblocks aswell etc....

No more of that hitting police cars in the boot to spin them out of a roadblock in NFS Most Wanted :P

Avatar image for Montaya
Montaya

4269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Montaya
Member since 2005 • 4269 Posts

Sure, its a great training exercise for tactical vehicles that are probably not being used that much and the costs were probably covered by the TVs shows producers. I doubt a couple 100 gallons of diesel fuel for the armored vehicles costs tens of thousands of dollars but I'm sure that's just the media prematurely inciting emotion like usual. If they had information or records that the suspect is heavily armed and dangerous than this just supports the response.

Avatar image for raven28256
raven28256

6072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#75 raven28256
Member since 2005 • 6072 Posts

Its probley was an apc

I highly doubt swat has acess to a m1a2 or a bradley

James161324

They don't, and it wasn't a tank. The heaviest vehicle that police have access to is a handful of decommissioned M113 APCs from the US Army. I haven't seen video of the vehicle in question, but if people are claiming it is a "tank" then it has to be an M113. This is because:

A.) When most people see a tracked vehicle, they instantly call it a tank regardless as to if it is a tank or not.

B.) Phoenix, Arizona is one of the very, very few places in America where SWAT teams do have a small number of old M113s.

So yeah guys. It wasn't a tank. In fact, it wasn't even armed; when SWAT teams use M113s they don't have the weapons on them. Using an M2 Browning in an urban area crawling with civilians isn't exactly a good idea, while the other weapons usually mounted on M113s (Like TOWs, M61 Vulcans, or Mk19s) aren't suited for police use. The news story blows things out of proportion by constantly talking about how they used a "tank," implying that SWAT rolled up in a fleet of M1A2s with full TUSK upgrade kits. Admittedly, that wasn't a situation that would have called for an M113, but the news report still gives you the wrong idea.

Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
LostProphetFLCL

18526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 LostProphetFLCL
Member since 2006 • 18526 Posts

I started humming the Tank theme song from L4D. Dante2710

Could you imagine a huge SWAT team rolling towards a house with a tank while blasting the tank theme? I think crime would cease to exist afterwards out of sheer pants-messing terror!:lol:

Anyways, I guess Arizona takes their cocks seriously!:lol:

Avatar image for klusps
klusps

10386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#77 klusps
Member since 2005 • 10386 Posts

Cockfighting = serious business...:P

Avatar image for Palantas
Palantas

15329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#78 Palantas
Member since 2002 • 15329 Posts

If nobody got hurt, then I really don't see a problem.

Avatar image for atony12
atony12

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#79 atony12
Member since 2007 • 960 Posts
It wasn't a tank like your thinking of with the big cannon and guns and all that crap, it was a police APC and most departments (Specially those here in Arizona) have them.
Avatar image for raven28256
raven28256

6072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#80 raven28256
Member since 2005 • 6072 Posts

Okay guys, I was wrong. It wasn't an M113, as I assumed it probably was based on the fact that the news claimed the police used a "tank." The reality makes it obvious that the news blew this even more out of proportion than I thought. It actually doesn't seem TOO excessive, now that I've found this video:

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/03/23/134803230/arizona-sheriff-uses-a-tank-to-arrest-cockfighting-suspect

The "tank" in question? It is a Cadillac Gage V-150 Commando, a 4x4 armored car. It isn't even a tracked vehicle. It seems that the media has an even looser definition of "tank" than I thought. I thought for sure the "tank" in question was probably just an M113, but it seems like it is a much more mundane V-150, something used in any routine raid carried out by SWAT if there is even a tiny risk of danger.

Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#81 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts

The "tank" in question? It is a Cadillac Gage V-150 Commando, a 4x4 armored car. It isn't even a tracked vehicle. It seems that the media has an even looser definition of "tank" than I thought. I thought for sure the "tank" in question was probably just an M113, but it seems like it is a much more mundane V-150, something used in any routine raid carried out by SWAT if there is even a tiny risk of danger.raven28256

^ I for one didn't expect it to be a battle tank..one the army uses. I expected it to be an armored vehicle just like that, without tracks.

Still, it's a bit overkill in my opinion. And quite laughable. It's a waste of money and recourses. Especially for a guy that has no history of gun possession and was only convicted one time (for cockfighting). Or so the news says anyway.

Avatar image for raven28256
raven28256

6072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#82 raven28256
Member since 2005 • 6072 Posts

[QUOTE="raven28256"]The "tank" in question? It is a Cadillac Gage V-150 Commando, a 4x4 armored car. It isn't even a tracked vehicle. It seems that the media has an even looser definition of "tank" than I thought. I thought for sure the "tank" in question was probably just an M113, but it seems like it is a much more mundane V-150, something used in any routine raid carried out by SWAT if there is even a tiny risk of danger.killerfist

^ I for one didn't expect it to be a battle tank..one the army uses. I expected it to be an armored vehicle just like that, without tracks.

Still, it's a bit overkill in my opinion. And quite laughable. It's a waste of money and recourses. Especially for a guy that has no history of gun possession and was only convicted one time (for cockfighting). Or so the news says anyway.

I was giving the media SOME credit, but apparently too much. I didn't think that their idea of a "tank" was a 4x4 armored car. Hell, calling a V-150 a "tank" is basically on par with claiming that SWAT commenced a raid using tanks when they just used a standard response van. Since they were claiming that they used "tanks" I was expecting at least just an M113, a tracked APC actually used by SWAT teams in Phoenix. Apparently, any large vehicle is now considered a "tank" by the media.

I do agree that things were still a bit excessive though. They certainly didn't need two of them; SWAT teams around here regularly handle far worse situations with only one BearCat. They definitely went a bit overboard, but it seems like it was much less excessive than the articles make it seem.

Avatar image for MiloZEgamer34
MiloZEgamer34

589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 MiloZEgamer34
Member since 2010 • 589 Posts

im pretty sure it was an apc

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
What the hell? A tank? Steven Segal? Seriously... what the hell? :lol:Maniacc1
chuck norris would not have needed a tank, he comes equiped with five anti tank appendages
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#85 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

In Michigan we use Apache gunships to track down jaywalkers. Appropriate use of force.

Avatar image for Sagem28
Sagem28

10498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 Sagem28
Member since 2010 • 10498 Posts

I actually lol'ed at this article :D

Also:

[spoiler] [/spoiler]

Avatar image for JusticeFromSeed
JusticeFromSeed

336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#87 JusticeFromSeed
Member since 2005 • 336 Posts

@Deihjan

From your replies to this thread, I can only seem to conclude that you actually 1) believe this article is real, and 2) believe a tank was ACTUALLY driven into a neighborhood in a heavy metropolitan area.

.........

Ok, then. Moving on.

Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#88 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

Its probley was an apc

I highly doubt swat has acess to a m1a2 or a bradley

raven28256

They don't, and it wasn't a tank. The heaviest vehicle that police have access to is a handful of decommissioned M113 APCs from the US Army. I haven't seen video of the vehicle in question, but if people are claiming it is a "tank" then it has to be an M113. This is because:

A.) When most people see a tracked vehicle, they instantly call it a tank regardless as to if it is a tank or not.

B.) Phoenix, Arizona is one of the very, very few places in America where SWAT teams do have a small number of old M113s.

So yeah guys. It wasn't a tank. In fact, it wasn't even armed; when SWAT teams use M113s they don't have the weapons on them. Using an M2 Browning in an urban area crawling with civilians isn't exactly a good idea, while the other weapons usually mounted on M113s (Like TOWs, M61 Vulcans, or Mk19s) aren't suited for police use. The news story blows things out of proportion by constantly talking about how they used a "tank," implying that SWAT rolled up in a fleet of M1A2s with full TUSK upgrade kits. Admittedly, that wasn't a situation that would have called for an M113, but the news report still gives you the wrong idea.

If Raven says it is so, then I'm going with what he says. This guy knows WAY more about military equipment than I'll ever know.