@Master_Live said:
@whipassmt said:
@lamprey263 said:
So does this mean Congress can abandon their pro forma sessions?
I don't know. It seems to me that the ruling could lead to them doing more pro forma sessions. Democrats should've foreseen that Republicans could use these sessions against a Democratic president when Senate Democrats started using these pro forma sessions against Bush back in 2007. Their shortsightedness - or lack of willingness to think in the longer term - has cost them. You reap what you sow.
Just like they will reap making just needing 50 votes to confirm judges and if the Republicans regain control of the Senate and then the WH they will reap the nuclear option (no more filibusters). Democrats started it and I hope Republicans finish it.
The Republicans did consider doing something like that back in 2005 (when they controlled the White House and both chambers of Congress) and Democrats were against it then. Joe Biden called that "a fundamental power grab".Then in 2014, after years of threatening, Reid did change the filibuster rules, though the old filibuster rules still apply to Supreme Court judges and legislation.
Reid is not really in a good position to criticize Republicans for their 41-Senator filibusters of Democrat legislation, since he frequently does not let Republican bills come up for a floor-vote, essentially meaning he does a 1-man filibuster of their legislation.
@comp_atkins said:
so what happens to the appointments made during that time? are they invalidated? will new people need to be appointed and the process begin anew?
at the rate things are going between congress and the executive branch. whoever is elected in 2016 should have all their appointed posts set up by the time they leave office.
Recess appointments only last until the end of the Congressional term, so the appointments Obama made had already expired last year. The issue here is that since those appointments were invalid, the National Labor Relations Board lacked a quota which means that any decisions they made in that period may be invalid.
Log in to comment