Ron Paul wants the UN to help him steal domain names.

Ron's integrity on display here.

It's good to see Ron Paul sticking by both his anti-UN and pro-free market principals, as well as showing gratitude to his grassroots supporters.

I'm not surprised. 

He opposed a cancer cure. He's clearly a nut.

Ron Paul probably isn't the one who is pursuing such a little issue like this. It's probably his staff doing it while he attends to more important things. Don't be so quick to judge just yet.CongressManStan

I see. So much like his self-published news letters 20 years ago he apparent still cannot control his own staff. And this man wanted us to put him in the White House?

Saving the world by screwing over his supporters. Classy.

[QUOTE="CongressManStan"]Ron Paul probably isn't the one who is pursuing such a little issue like this. It's probably his staff doing it while he attends to more important things. Don't be so quick to judge just yet.worlock77

I see. So much like his self-published news letters 20 years ago he apparent still cannot control his own staff. And this man wanted us to put him in the White House?

[QUOTE="CongressManStan"]Ron Paul probably isn't the one who is pursuing such a little issue like this. It's probably his staff doing it while he attends to more important things. Don't be so quick to judge just yet.worlock77

I see. So much like his self-published news letters 20 years ago he apparent still cannot control his own staff. And this man wanted us to put him in the White House?

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="CongressManStan"]Ron Paul probably isn't the one who is pursuing such a little issue like this. It's probably his staff doing it while he attends to more important things. Don't be so quick to judge just yet.CongressManStan

I see. So much like his self-published news letters 20 years ago he apparent still cannot control his own staff. And this man wanted us to put him in the White House?

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="CongressManStan"]Ron Paul probably isn't the one who is pursuing such a little issue like this. It's probably his staff doing it while he attends to more important things. Don't be so quick to judge just yet.CongressManStan

I see. So much like his self-published news letters 20 years ago he apparent still cannot control his own staff. And this man wanted us to put him in the White House?

Certain he can't control every little action done by his staff members, but he can definately control what gets published in his name (since he was, you know, the publisher), and he can most certainly control what legal actions get filed with international bodies in his name. If he can't then that's an alarming level of incompetence or indifference on his part.

I'm not surprised. 

He opposed a cancer cure. He's clearly a nut.

MakeMeaSammitch

You took that unbelievably out of context...

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

I'm not surprised. 

He opposed a cancer cure. He's clearly a nut.

sexyweapons

You took that unbelievably out of context...

That's not out of context.

He was opposing curing a form of cancer.

paulbots smh smh

Dude is still a baller.

Why do he want a commercial website? 

[QUOTE="sexyweapons"]

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

I'm not surprised. 

He opposed a cancer cure. He's clearly a nut.

MakeMeaSammitch

You took that unbelievably out of context...

That's not out of context.

He was opposing curing a form of cancer.

paulbots smh smh

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="sexyweapons"]

You took that unbelievably out of context...

Fightingfan

That's not out of context.

He was opposing curing a form of cancer.

paulbots smh smh

It's available now. You can go get the preventative shot tomorrow if you want.

[QUOTE="sexyweapons"]

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

I'm not surprised. 

He opposed a cancer cure. He's clearly a nut.

MakeMeaSammitch

You took that unbelievably out of context...

That's not out of context.

He was opposing curing a form of cancer.

paulbots smh smh

Meh, they absolutely deserve to be fvcked over like that, they're Ron Paul supporters after all.

Ron Paul would not do this. Something bad is happening.Laihendi

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="sexyweapons"]

You took that unbelievably out of context...

sexyweapons

That's not out of context.

He was opposing curing a form of cancer.

paulbots smh smh

smh smh

[QUOTE="sexyweapons"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]he opposed a vaccine that would cure a form of cancer women can get in their reproductive system.

That's not out of context.

He was opposing curing a form of cancer.

paulbots smh smh

MakeMeaSammitch

smh smh

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]he opposed a vaccine that would cure a form of cancer women can get in their reproductive system.

That's not out of context.

He was opposing curing a form of cancer.

paulbots smh smh

MakeMeaSammitch

It's available now. You can go get the preventative shot tomorrow if you want.

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="sexyweapons"] Tell me the whole story...sexyweapons

smh smh

an ideology that would kill thousands of women?

I'm not ignoring that.

smh smh  

Ron Paul would not do this. Something bad is happening.Laihendi

lol

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="sexyweapons"]

You took that unbelievably out of context...

Fightingfan

That's not out of context.

He was opposing curing a form of cancer.

paulbots smh smh

This is some grade A, unadulterated ignorance right here.

Ron Paul would not do this. Something bad is happening.Laihendi

Clearly he would, because he is.

Dirtbag racist and homophobic old man does dirtbag thing, more at 11.

Ron Paul would not do this. Something bad is happening.Laihendi

[QUOTE="Laihendi"]Ron Paul would not do this. Something bad is happening.Rich3232

Jesus guys, this sounds like a stock-standard UDRP claim against cybersquatters.

If you can prove that a website was registered and used in bad faith (such as them trying to scam money off people with legitimate interests in having that website), then you can take the website from them. Anyone can do this. It happens all the time.

As far as I'm aware, all .com and .org cases are handled by WIPO's Arbitration and Mediation Centre, as mandated by ICANN (the guys who manage domain name registries). They're technically part of the United Nations, but there's no other alternatives here - these guys run domain name cases by convention.

He's not making a personal appeal to the United Nations to intervene on his behalf, or anything of the sort.

[QUOTE="Laihendi"]Ron Paul would not do this. Something bad is happening.worlock77

Clearly he would, because he is.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"]Ron Paul would not do this. Something bad is happening.Laihendi

Clearly he would, because he is.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"]Ron Paul would not do this. Something bad is happening.Laihendi

Clearly he would, because he is.

I don't see how anyone can have faith in the mainstream media's coverage of Ron Paul after seeing what they just did to him in the 2012 election.Laihendi

I don't see how anyone can have faith in the mainstream media's coverage of Ron Paul after seeing what they just did to him in the 2012 election.Laihendi

Ron Paul would not do this. Something bad is happening.Laihendi

Jesus guys, this sounds like a stock-standard UDRP claim against cybersquatters.

If you can prove that a website was registered and used in bad faith (such as them trying to scam money off people with legitimate interests in having that website), then you can take the website from them. Anyone can do this. It happens all the time.

As far as I'm aware, all .com and .org cases are handled by WIPO's Arbitration and Mediation Centre, as mandated by ICANN (the guys who manage domain name registries). They're technically part of the United Nations, but there's no other alternatives here - these guys run domain name cases by convention.

He's not making a personal appeal to the United Nations to intervene on his behalf, or anything of the sort.

Planeforger

Nobody registered the sites or used them in bad faith. The two sites were registered by Ron Paul supporters who used the site in a grassroots effort to generate more support for Ron Paul. Support he was happy to have until now.

I don't see how anyone can have faith in the mainstream media's coverage of Ron Paul after seeing what they just did to him in the 2012 election.Laihendi

You really need to take the blinders off dude. This isn't the mainstream media saying this, this is the people who run the two sites in question saying this.

ITT people who still take lai seriously

ITT people who still take lai seriously

wis3boi

I don't think anyone really takes Lai seriously, but he's good for lulz.

ITT people who still take lai seriously

wis3boi

We need to take him seriously. Otherwise OT is less fun.

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

ITT people who still take lai seriously

MakeMeaSammitch

We need to take him seriously. Otherwise OT is less fun.

at least shadow threatens people with violence and legal action

[QUOTE="Planeforger"]

Jesus guys, this sounds like a stock-standard UDRP claim against cybersquatters.

If you can prove that a website was registered and used in bad faith (such as them trying to scam money off people with legitimate interests in having that website), then you can take the website from them. Anyone can do this. It happens all the time.

As far as I'm aware, all .com and .org cases are handled by WIPO's Arbitration and Mediation Centre, as mandated by ICANN (the guys who manage domain name registries). They're technically part of the United Nations, but there's no other alternatives here - these guys run domain name cases by convention.

He's not making a personal appeal to the United Nations to intervene on his behalf, or anything of the sort.

worlock77

Nobody registered the sites or used them in bad faith. The two sites were registered by Ron Paul supporters who used the site in a grassroots effort to generate more support for Ron Paul. Support he was happy to have until now.

It has integrity?