Number Of Early Childhood Vaccines Not Linked To Autism - NPR Report

A government news organization claims that government mandated vaccinations do not cause autism. NPR has no credibility.Laihendi

I promise....

[QUOTE="Laihendi"]A government news organization claims that government mandated vaccinations do not cause autism. NPR has no credibility.MakeMeaSammitch

I promise....

Chloroform is the best for that. ;)

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"][QUOTE="Laihendi"] I have not done research on a potential link between vaccines and autism, but I do not believe anything that NPR says just because they say it. It is not a legitimate source of news.Laihendi

http://reason.com/

http://www.cato.org/

http://www.forbes.com/

Those are legitimate news sources.

Holy crap you're stupid. 

[QUOTE="Laihendi"]

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"] What is a legitimate news source then? MakeMeaSammitch

http://reason.com/

http://www.cato.org/

http://www.forbes.com/

Those are legitimate news sources.

Holy crap you're stupid. 

Wait until I link Lai the cato piece where they defend Obama.

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] Calling his drivel a philosophy gives it too much credit. Laihendi

The same could be said for Ayn Rand.

basically the same thing 

Since this is Forbes, Laihendi believes in this story.

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"]

http://reason.com/

http://www.cato.org/

http://www.forbes.com/

Those are legitimate news sources.

DroidPhysX

Holy crap you're stupid. 

Wait until I link Lai the cato piece where they defend Obama.

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]The front page of forbes is reporting the study that shows no relationship.

Holy crap you're stupid. 

Laihendi

Wait until I link Lai the cato piece where they defend Obama.

lol no

Since this is Forbes, Laihendi believes in this story.

DroidPhysX

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

The same could be said for Ayn Rand.

MakeMeaSammitch

basically the same thing 

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"] Being biased in favour of liberty is synonymous with being biased in favour of objective reality. To criticize a news organization for exposing the human rights violations promoted and carried out by statists is absurd.

And Jim the study mentioned in the article you linked was funded by the CDC which is a government organization.

Laihendi

So how does that change your view of Forbes as a news source if they are posting news with government funded research on their site?

If they don't they're making a mistake.

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Since this is Forbes, Laihendi believes in this story.

Laihendi

lai, you never answered my question.

Is slavery ok if the slave is purchsed through legal means for use in a business?

If it's no ok, isn't that just interference with free market? 

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Since this is Forbes, Laihendi believes in this story.

Laihendi

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"]Have you even read Atlas Shrugged?-Sun_Tzu-

basically the same thing 

lai, you never answered my question.

Is slavery ok if the slave is purchsed through legal means for use in a business?

If it's no ok, isn't that just interference with free market? 

MakeMeaSammitch

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Wait until I link Lai the cato piece where they defend Obama.

DroidPhysX

lol no

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

lai, you never answered my question.

Is slavery ok if the slave is purchsed through legal means for use in a business?

If it's no ok, isn't that just interference with free market? 

Laihendi

that's free market.

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"] Please do so. I suspect you are bluffing.Laihendi

lol no

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

lol no

DroidPhysX

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

lai, you never answered my question.

Is slavery ok if the slave is purchsed through legal means for use in a business?

If it's no ok, isn't that just interference with free market? 

MakeMeaSammitch

that's free market.

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

lai, you never answered my question.

Is slavery ok if the slave is purchsed through legal means for use in a business?

If it's no ok, isn't that just interference with free market? 

MakeMeaSammitch

that's free market.

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Since this is Forbes, Laihendi believes in this story.

Laihendi

They chose to publish it so yes, it does.

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"] Please explain how a market is free if humans are being forced into slavery. Your question is just stupid.Laihendi

that's free market.

and that's bad!

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"] Please explain how a market is free if humans are being forced into slavery. Your question is just stupid.Laihendi

that's free market.

Maybe those slaves have no concept of natural rights.

I love how moms are willing to risk their childrens lives based on what they see on the news.

Your child is more likely to die from the flu than get damaged from perfectly safe vaccines.

[QUOTE="MakeMeaSammitch"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"] Please explain how a market is free if humans are being forced into slavery. Your question is just stupid.Laihendi

that's free market.

lai, you still haven't replied to my post.

pfft.

who you gonna believe?

lying ass facts, studies and science or this chick?

still not good enough?

then lets bring in jennys scientific research consultant.

take that science!

A government news organization claims that government mandated vaccinations do not cause autism. NPR has no credibility.Laihendi

[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Since this is Forbes, Laihendi believes in this story.

worlock77

They chose to publish it so yes, it does.

Why are people still debating this?dramaybaz

[QUOTE="Laihendi"]A government news organization claims that government mandated vaccinations do not cause autism. NPR has no credibility.DirigiblePlums

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Laihendi"] That is an op-ed article and does not reflect the values or integrity of Forbes.Laihendi

They chose to publish it so yes, it does.

Rick Ungar is not from outside the organization, he's a regular writer for Forbes. Notwithstanding the fact that they have final say-so over what gets published in their magazine and on their website. So yes, the content is a reflection on them. That's why, for instance, the local pro-Republican newspaper here doesn't publish articles that favor Democrats.