With what are we gonna attack? Hockey sticks? Bears? Make dams with beavers and blow them up to flood you guys? Ask the Brits--or even worse, French--for help?
I dunno what mexico or canada would want in the USA. Is there anything awesome to get there? You could just order it online if you want a big TV or so. Wouldn't they also capture the USA debt?
The whole Idea is asinine. The United Stated would most deffinately win. Canada has a pathetic millatary and stays nuetral in the state of world affairs inless The Queen dictates otherwise. Mexico? Are you serious? Their writing pamplets on how to send their people over here because they have no money and resourses. The only way "mexico" would invade is if it was by the gangs and druglords and we would still easily win. Not to say that what ever damage they caused wouldn't be devaststating. Any one with a pulse and a head full of anger can shock the nation. Just look at Connecticutt.....
I'd hate for that to happen, though I'd think we'd stand our ground I'd imagine some significant amount of hate filled gun toting yokels would love an excuse to start capping brown people and they'd probably kill quite a few Native Americans and southeast Asians while they're at it.
The USA would crush both in a matter of weeks. Canada has no real army and nether do Mexico . The US air force could level our citys in a mater of days without nuclear weapons should we attack. We in Canada dont spend much on defense because we have uncle same next door and Mexico has no money to spend on there's
do you really think we gave it our all in Vietnam? The ground troops did with what they had, but the government held us back while we tried out new tech "toys"
I dunno what mexico or canada would want in the USA. Is there anything awesome to get there? You could just order it online if you want a big TV or so. Wouldn't they also capture the USA debt?
We're ignoring something here, we just imagine the hypothetical in the moment thinking can we handle it now, but consider would Canada and Mexico consider it? And if Canada and Mexico did consider it, at whatever point in our future, should we always assume that we'll have the capability to crush them? What if, say, in the future we succumb to our debt and failed leadership in government, our military falls apart, our defense structure collapses, can we rely on our pro 2nd amendment defense people to protect the country? I figure they'd just end up shooting each other but yeah I don't think so. Furthermore, if say Canada and Mexico did attack us, what's not to say the conditions of such an attack are on a moral high ground and how would that effect the outcome. Say in the collapse and desperation of America our lowest common denominator picks Ran Paul for President and he nukes the England because he thinks the Queen of England runs the New World Order and she orchestrated the financial disaster and blah blah blah, whatever crazy crap he comes up with, and the world sees us as a threat to global security. So say it wouldn't just be Canada and Mexico attacking us from those borders, but everyone with the will to fight, you asking if we could still take them? And at this point, who does we entail because if they wanted on our land to take out our leader at that point I'll welcome them with flowers and let them **** my wife and wish them the best of luck. I imagine at this point many sensible people would not be committed to the defense of the country if such a scenario were to take place.
We would easily kick both their asses. Canada isn't incompetant, but no match for the world's only real military superpower. And Mexico can't even get their crap together enough to fight the cartels in their own territory, or the corruption in their military and government. We could probably bribe off that invasion if we had to.
The whole Idea is asinine. The United Stated would most deffinately win. Canada has a pathetic millatary and stays nuetral in the state of world affairs inless The Queen dictates otherwise. Mexico? Are you serious? Their writing pamplets on how to send their people over here because they have no money and resourses. The only way "mexico" would invade is if it was by the gangs and druglords and we would still easily win. Not to say that what ever damage they caused wouldn't be devaststating. Any one with a pulse and a head full of anger can shock the nation. Just look at Connecticutt.....WhatWouldJoshDo
....yea, Canada does not and has never stayed "neutral"
We've been at America's side more or less since ww2.
do you really think we gave it our all in Vietnam? The ground troops did with what they had, but the government held us back while we tried out new tech "toys"
Whatever the reasons or rationalizations, Vietnam was still a loss.
do you really think we gave it our all in Vietnam? The ground troops did with what they had, but the government held us back while we tried out new tech "toys"
Whatever the reasons or rationalizations, Vietnam was still a loss.
All war is a loss.. . . . I just wanted to say something like that because of the budha.
[QUOTE="WhatWouldJoshDo"]The whole Idea is asinine. The United Stated would most deffinately win. Canada has a pathetic millatary and stays nuetral in the state of world affairs inless The Queen dictates otherwise. Mexico? Are you serious? Their writing pamplets on how to send their people over here because they have no money and resourses. The only way "mexico" would invade is if it was by the gangs and druglords and we would still easily win. Not to say that what ever damage they caused wouldn't be devaststating. Any one with a pulse and a head full of anger can shock the nation. Just look at Connecticutt.....BossPerson
....yea, Canada does not and has never stayed "neutral"
We've been at America's side more or less since ww2.
Technically they've been at Britain's side. But, the US, UK, and Canada have a pretty special relationship. Being serious for a moment, I dont think there could ever be a war between the US and Canada now given the large border and blending of populations. You'd be fighting your brother.
do you really think we gave it our all in Vietnam? The ground troops did with what they had, but the government held us back while we tried out new tech "toys"
sonicare
Whatever the reasons or rationalizations, Vietnam was still a loss.
All war is a loss.. . . . I just wanted to say something like that because of the budha.
Not sure if the Buddha ever said anything like that. But the man did ramble to whoever would listen for 40 years, so it's entirely possible that he did.
America would win against Mexico simply because we'd be like "Hey, Mexicans living in California, fight for us and you can stay and not pay taxes" and they'd be like "WOOOOOOHOOOOOO!" and would kill their former countrymen for us.
After all, they did build most of the border fence...
Yep. We totally didn't win that Revolutionary War. Or the Civil War, the Mexican-American War, the Spanish-American War, or the Philippine-American War....
The Mexican military can't even take out drug cartels lol. It's like we would just be fighting a average nation in the north, and a flea in the south.
Rich3232
The U.S. is not able to do the same.
I don't know what world you live in, but in the really real world here the US law enforcement has had nothing but resounding success in stopping drug traffic.
The Mexican military can't even take out drug cartels lol. It's like we would just be fighting a average nation in the north, and a flea in the south.
worlock77
The U.S. is not able to do the same.
I don't know what world you live in, but in the really real world here the US law enforcement has had nothing but resounding success in stopping drug traffic.
That's right, it's the reason why prices keep going down for most drugs due to lessened supply thanks to the efforts of the glorious crusaders we call cops! I'm glad afterwards, they can just go home and have a nice drink because alcohol is totally not a drug.
Log in to comment