This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Xx_Hopeless_xX"][QUOTE="LZ71"] After reading through the comments, I'd agree with Toriko's post, if it actually does happen. It'd be over in less than five seconds, with something covering the naughty bits.LZ71
But still...why?..
Not a clue, seems like a dumb decision to me. It's been a while since I read the last book, so I can't even remember if it has a nude scene in it at all.I agree that it would probably be a dumb decision..:|
Thanks, Theo. I just spit out my sub sandwich.I've seen Daniel Radcliffe naked, and let me tell you, President George had less Bush.
Theokhoth
I stopped watching after the third movie. It just seemed to have lost it's magic.LightRThe first two movies were great because they were as close to the books as possible, but after the person who directed the first two movies left, it just went downhill with major continuity problems and cliches (if I have to have to watch one mroe scene of a person crying/shouting in slow motion with no sound after someone dies, I'm going to ram my head through a wall.)
I could care less if Harry is nude in the next movie. Emma Watson, however, is a totally different story0Tyler0You "*could* care less"? So you care a reasonable amount? So you want to see Harry naked? "A totally different story" for Emma Watson? So you dont want to see her naked? So you're homosexual? Glad we cleared that up.
....wtf...Yeah none of that was in the booksparadigm68Actually both are in the books. Ron imagines a love scene between Harry and Hermione, but it doesn't say they were naked, I'm pretty sure that's tacked on by the producers to cause some controversy... Then at the end Harry is naked at Kings Cross because.. well i don't wanna put in spoilers..
[QUOTE="paradigm68"]....wtf...Yeah none of that was in the booksPenguinchowActually both are in the books. Ron imagines a love scene between Harry and Hermione, but it doesn't say they were naked, I'm pretty sure that's tacked on by the producers to cause some controversy... Then at the end Harry is naked at Kings Cross because.. well i don't wanna put in spoilers..
I really don't think Harry was naked there. . .
Actually both are in the books. Ron imagines a love scene between Harry and Hermione, but it doesn't say they were naked, I'm pretty sure that's tacked on by the producers to cause some controversy... Then at the end Harry is naked at Kings Cross because.. well i don't wanna put in spoilers..[QUOTE="Penguinchow"][QUOTE="paradigm68"]....wtf...Yeah none of that was in the booksTheokhoth
I really don't think Harry was naked there. . .
At kings cross he was. Like I said, i doubt he is in Ron's imagination (lol weeeelllll)[QUOTE="paradigm68"]....wtf...Yeah none of that was in the booksPenguinchowActually both are in the books. Ron imagines a love scene between Harry and Hermione, but it doesn't say they were naked, I'm pretty sure that's tacked on by the producers to cause some controversy... Then at the end Harry is naked at Kings Cross because.. well i don't wanna put in spoilers.. Yeah, it's been a long time since I read book 7, but this all sounds about right. Still, this sounds like an attempt to appeal to the Twilight fanbase, since those movies have been doing so well.
She was legal at 16...................................(just not for camera's) GIGGITY!!!...You mean that girl's legal now?
Y'know, I wasn't gonna see this movie but I thought hey, the last ones were rated pretty good and thisonesgotanakedgirlinit*cough* sorry about that.trust_nobody
Well...I don't know what to say. Nude or not they'll still be covered up so there's no reason to get excited over it.
Except that some of them are PG-13, but yeah. I get the one with the Dumbledore scene, I guess that's kind how it played out in the book. Like the breif scene where Gandalf beats the Balrog and is brought back to life, you don't see anything, but it's implied.What the heck? Why would they do this in the Harry Potter movies? The movies that make the most money are G rated movies...This is ridiculous.
-Pro-Link-
Obviously the title of the article was made to bring people to the site due to misinterpretation. Somethign many news agencys and websites are well known to do. The actual article says that Daniel Radcliff will have two nudes scenes and goes in depth aboutr him already appearing live on stage in the buff. It doesn't say anything about Emma Watson doing the same. SPOILERS: It says that there will be a dream sequence where Ron imagines Harry and Hermione together, right when he is trying to destroy the horcrux (it tries to influence him into killing Harry instead).[QUOTE="viewtiful26"] The article's title says 'nude scenes with costar Emma Watson'.... BumFluff122
[QUOTE="MrsSolidSnake"]
[QUOTE="one_plum"]
I thought Hermione would end up with Ron or something...
... Yes, I know almost nothing about the Harry potter series.
Bluestorm-Kalas
Read the last chapter of the 7th book.
Or as I call it, the chapter that almost made me vomit with how cliche it was. I ignored the last chapter completely, and pretended that Malfoy and Hermione got together lol.harry's wet dream?
kemar7856
SPOILERS!!!!
Harry dies and then hes naked and meets dumbledore and comes back to life. (he has clothes when they talk though)
I think I should put these to rest, in saying that there is only an unsourced and uncited quote from David Yates, mentioning Harry will be "bare" for the Locket scene, during which the Locket produces images of Harry and Hermione kissing, trying to turn Ron against Harry. This, in the book, comes right after Harry dives to the bottom of a pond to retrieve a sword, and in the book, he strips to his underwear first.
Not only is the quote from Yates not sourced, thus it could just be made up, it doesn't specify which Harry (the real one or the illusionary one) is "bare", and what "bare" means. It sure as hell doesn't mention Hermione, and the images the Locket produces in the book were most definitely clothed.
There is one scene later in the book where Harry is in a dreamworld/in between, and is briefly naked at the start, I mean for the first few sentences, before he finds clothes. That might be kept the same, but don't expect anything below the torso even if it is.
But tabloids shouting about how Harry and Hermione will get naked are talking crap, as usual.
You "*could* care less"? So you care a reasonable amount? So you want to see Harry naked? "A totally different story" for Emma Watson? So you dont want to see her naked? So you're homosexual? Glad we cleared that up.[QUOTE="0Tyler0"]I could care less if Harry is nude in the next movie. Emma Watson, however, is a totally different storykamikaze_pigmy
[QUOTE="Bluestorm-Kalas"]Or as I call it, the chapter that almost made me vomit with how cliche it was. I ignored the last chapter completely, and pretended that Malfoy and Hermione got together lol. Lawl? I didn't even read the book, I just read the last chapter to see if Harry dies or not.[QUOTE="MrsSolidSnake"]
Read the last chapter of the 7th book.
thequietguy
[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]It's Emma Watson, dude...Oh dear. DO NOT WANT.
scorch-62
Yeah, but she's probably gonna be blurred by smoke.
It's not in the book....[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="viewtiful26"] The article explains the context of the nude scene, apparently it's a dream sequence or something like that. I haven't read the books in a long time so I have trouble recalling the segment the article describes.cdav89
I believe he's talking about the part where...
SPOILERS!!!!!
Harry dies and goes to that weird place that's like King's Cross and talks to Dumbledore. He was naked in that scene, but put on a robe shortly after arriving.
OMG, thanks a lot. Put spoiler tags on that!Ok, everyone ignored my post.
I'll just get to the point quicker, it's BS, and Emma Watson is not getting naked.
It's not in the book....LJS9502_basic
I believe he's talking about the part where...
SPOILERS!!!!!
Harry dies and goes to that weird place that's like King's Cross and talks to Dumbledore. He was naked in that scene, but put on a robe shortly after arriving.
OMG, thanks a lot. Put spoiler tags on that! There be a statute of limitations on spoilers, that book was released in 2007. If anyones complainin about "spoilers" 3 years later, it's an issue.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment