@RadecSupreme said:
Paying people enough money for them to live constitutes a charity? You seem so infatuated to defending the corporate business practices...
Let me answer that question with this scenario...
People give away money all the time. People donate to disaster relief, cancer research, education, whatever. People are absolutely happy to just give away money to a worthy cause. So...why exactly should mcDonalds pay their workers more? If it's such a travesty that the fry cook and the cashier at McDonalds aren't getting paid a living wage, then you're entirely free to set up a charity wherein people donate money to McDonalds employees. Let's see how that works for you.
Bottom line is that, no, McDonalds ISN'T in any way obligated to pay their workers a "living wage". They're obligated to pay their workers at least minimum wage, which they do. If that's not enough, get the minimum wage raised. But McDonalds wages, at least for entry level positions, are pretty much in line with what's normal for the industry. I'm not sure why you're trying to paint one single company in an entire industry as the villain, when it's the LAW that says that companies are allowed to pay that little. McDonalds doesn't set the wage laws, dude. That's not defending corporate practices, that's just how shit works. If I feel that a company is underpaying their workers, then I might boycott that company. What I DON'T do is go and buy a $6 combo meal and then hand the worker $20 on the side to put towards their utility bills. If a company charges $10 for a good or service, most people generally don't give out an extra $10 just for the hell of it. Similarly, if an employee agrees to work for $9 an hour, most companies aren't just gonna double that wage if they're already happy with the quality of labor that such a wage provides.
Log in to comment