What do you think of the new Call of Duty world at War game? On a scale of 1-10

I think id give call of duty 5 a 9

loved the graphics id say.....8.5.

I would give it an 8 but with how much i play it on line its a 9 for me.

7

it's basically call of duty 3 with a slightly updated control scheme that doesn't match Metroid or MoHH2, despite those titles being over a year old.

On the game description there is already a place to rate the game from 1 - 10....

I give 8, because I think the graphic is not good enough, but otherwise it's very good game.

8.5, currently the bet shooter on the wii. (Excluding Metroid Prime 3)

A 7.

The Campaign was pretty good(mainly the Russian Campaign), though I wish they didn't cut out Black Cats. The multi-player is in need of dire fixing. The weapons are horribly balanced, overpowered perks, filled with exploits/glitches. That and there's DEATHMATCH ONLY gametypes, I mean, there's some interesting gametypes, but they're all not too different.

Could of been better, much better. Nuff' said.

Could of been better, much better. Nuff' said.Lord_Nas3k

I would give it a 7. My only big gripe is that there are so many obstacles on the ground. I am always getting stuck on invisible barriers, and most of the time it causes me to die. Also, I wish that there was a custom control scheme option, I always have trouble when using the delta controls and trying to use the Z button to steady my aim and instead picking up a weapon. It has resulted in many deaths.

i tottaly hat that to

8.. Once i realy got into it, I found it's a fun game. With some intense and rememberable moments. Thoe for online I got to MOHH2, it offers bigger matches and it's fun to just pick up and play don't have to worry about ranks.

A 6 for the Wii version. And a 9 for the other versions. I tried it on the Wii and after playing the 360 version the Wii is basically just a rushed port. And wtf they took out zombie mode.

6/10, I have only played the 360 version, but either way, World at War feels more like a mod for COD4 rather than a new gameWaffle_Fish

8.5

I havn't played COD5, but i gave MOHH2 a 7.5 and i highly doubt it beats World at War.

I havn't played COD5, but i gave MOHH2 a 7.5 and i highly doubt it beats World at War.Pesantez

I didnt play it because its not working on my fu***** Wii :evil:

i rated it 8.5

When i reviewed it, i gave it 9.5 because i hadn't played the 360 or ps3 versions yet. I'd now give it an 8 because of the lack of a good split-screen mode, no split-screen online and no nazi zombies, which in my opinion, would be fantastic on the Wii

cod waw 9.5

8 since it plats so much better than MoH:H2.

Could have been a 9 if it wern't so stripped down though.

9, best wii shooter,hands down,realistic physics, top notch controls, visually as good as wii gets, good campaign,Solid SMOTH online mutiplayer.And getting stuck in invisible walls?never happened to me in 5 months of having it playing it daily.And recently a patch added some game modes.

(not first person adventure as people call Prime).

For Wii: 4/10.

i loved Mohh 2! I tried COD WAW at first and didnt like it... didnt like how you randomly joined games.... then I hooked up online with buddies and now I'm hooked. I do miss sewers in Mohh 2.... but COd is for me. I'd give COD a 9.. you have to admit, for a Wii fps, this comes as close as it gets (until Conduit comes out). Mohh 2 - i give an 8.

-Afro

9.5 its a great series and thank god they are thinking of Wii owners because there aren't a lot of FPSs in the wii.Ive got this, james bond and medal of honor they are the only great FPSs on Wii

For the online alone I would rate it a 9, but the lackluster single player knocks it down to a 7.5.

[QUOTE="Waffle_Fish"]6/10, I have only played the 360 version, but either way, World at War feels more like a mod for COD4 rather than a new gameRetroJello