Oh NO! Samurai Warriors 3 GS review is in!

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/samuraiwarriors3/review.html

Sorry if old

It got a 4.5. Thats a low score thought it would do a bit better. Thoughts?

I haven't played it yet, but I have to say it looked fun when Gary and Alison were playing it.

I haven't played it yet, but I have to say it looked fun when Gary and Alison were playing it.

LovePotionNo9

Haven't watched that show in a long time but don't Gary and Alison usally make games look terible?

If it's anything like Dynasty Warriors.....you know why it got the Score.

I'm not suprised it got that score.

If you've played one Samurai Warriors/Dynasty Warriors game you've pretty much played them all. Fun for an hour or two then gets extremely boring. Gives new meaning to the words repetative, dull, unimaginative...

I'm amazed people still buy the games and support the franchise. You'd think they could at least add online co-op or something to make it worthwhile.

When was no wii speak a bad thing? I mean only like 3 wii games use it.Fightingfan

It's Koei. They literally have not changed Dynasty Warriors/ Samurai Warriors (they're both THE SAME SERIES) since... the first one. It's going to get old after yearly installments.

It's Koei. They literally have not changed Dynasty Warriors/ Samurai Warriors (they're both THE SAME SERIES) since... the first one. It's going to get old after yearly installments.

nintendofreak_2

Got the game played it ..& I didn't like it. Very boring..go here kill that guy, go there kill that other guy,..now kill your ally. Very pretty but that's abt it. This one is going to the trade piles.

Well thats no surprise. Koei is a terrible developer.

It's Koei. They literally have not changed Dynasty Warriors/ Samurai Warriors (they're both THE SAME SERIES) since... the first one. It's going to get old after yearly installments.

nintendofreak_2

[QUOTE="nintendofreak_2"]

It's Koei. They literally have not changed Dynasty Warriors/ Samurai Warriors (they're both THE SAME SERIES) since... the first one. It's going to get old after yearly installments.

BrunoBRS

"Haters going to hate", it's honestly not surprising though as a lot of people are ignorant of the "Warriors" series.

P.S. Besides the fact that Gamespot is biased I heard some fans aren't enjoying the game too much either, play Samurai Warriors 1-2 instead.

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="nintendofreak_2"]

It's Koei. They literally have not changed Dynasty Warriors/ Samurai Warriors (they're both THE SAME SERIES) since... the first one. It's going to get old after yearly installments.

nintendofreak_2

"Haters going to hate", it's honestly not surprising though as a lot of people are ignorant of the "Warriors" series.

P.S. Besides the fact that Gamespot is biased I heard some fans aren't enjoying the game too much either, play Samurai Warriors 1-2 instead.

Yangire

well It's not that I didn't like Dynasty Warriors (I accually liked it.) but Because of the repetitive nature that Dynasty Warriors has (assuming Samurai Warriors is pretty much the same) I can see why they give it a low score.

Honestly I don't think it's a big issue. People who know what the series is like either like it or don't by now. . Chojuto

When was no wii speak a bad thing? I mean only like 3 wii games use it.Fightingfan

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]When was no wii speak a bad thing? I mean only like 3 wii games use it.Rod90

meh never cared for it

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]When was no wii speak a bad thing? I mean only like 3 wii games use it.Rod90