Does any body not like the way GS is reviewing VC games

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for StarFoxCOM
StarFoxCOM

5605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#1 StarFoxCOM
Member since 2006 • 5605 Posts
Therer treating the games like they cost Double there price but really it's like  5 to 10 Dollars 
Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
They rate them on how well they hold up today and how well they were emulated.
Avatar image for FLYmeatwad
FLYmeatwad

553

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 FLYmeatwad
Member since 2006 • 553 Posts
Well, I never owned an SNES, only an NES, Genesis, and 64, so right now I'm concentrating on buying great SNES games I missed out on so I don't know how much different it is playing with the GC controller as opposed to the SNES controller. Though I don't think they need to be nearly as harsh because it's not like they are brand new games, just ports. SMW is a little difficult to control with the GC controller though...
Avatar image for ShakeNBake1491
ShakeNBake1491

3055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 ShakeNBake1491
Member since 2004 • 3055 Posts

Nobody

likes the way GS is doing it....

1.) they should just recommend it or not recommend it and tell how well it was emulated, not review it
2.) they should group them separate from actual Wii games
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="ShakeNBake1491"]

Nobody

likes the way GS is doing it.... 1.) they should just recommend it or not recommend it, not review it 2.) they should group them separate from actual Wii games


Actually I like the way they do it.
It's how these games stand up compared to today, lots of people weren't around for these games the first time, no need for them to get suckered into getting Urban Champion.
Avatar image for reggie186
reggie186

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#6 reggie186
Member since 2004 • 3910 Posts
[QUOTE="ShakeNBake1491"]

Nobody

likes the way GS is doing it.... 1.) they should just recommend it or not recommend it, not review it 2.) they should group them separate from actual Wii gamesJaysonguy


Actually I like the way they do it.
It's how these games stand up compared to today, lots of people weren't around for these games the first time, no need for them to get suckered into getting Urban Champion.

I agree. I like the VC reviews on Gamespot.

Avatar image for zcds
zcds

1984

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 161

User Lists: 0

#7 zcds
Member since 2005 • 1984 Posts
they are comparing them to today's standards, how well they hold up and will entertain, just because a game is a classic dosen't mean it's gonna get a good score.  they are though but fair .
Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
they are comparing them to today's standards, how well they hold up and will entertain, just because a game is a classic dosen't mean it's gonna get a good score.  they are though but fair .zcds
Exactly, and Goldeneye would deservedly get something like 6 even though it was a god in its day.
Avatar image for FLYmeatwad
FLYmeatwad

553

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 FLYmeatwad
Member since 2006 • 553 Posts
[QUOTE="zcds"]they are comparing them to today's standards, how well they hold up and will entertain, just because a game is a classic dosen't mean it's gonna get a good score.  they are though but fair .tomarlyn
Exactly, and Goldeneye would deservedly get something like 6 even though it was a god in its day.

And still to this day actually plays great with the 64 controller, even if it did feel a bit odd the first time I went back to it after about 4 or 5 years.
Avatar image for StarFoxCOM
StarFoxCOM

5605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#10 StarFoxCOM
Member since 2006 • 5605 Posts
[QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="zcds"]they are comparing them to today's standards, how well they hold up and will entertain, just because a game is a classic dosen't mean it's gonna get a good score.  they are though but fair .FLYmeatwad
Exactly, and Goldeneye would deservedly get something like 6 even though it was a god in its day.

And still to this day actually plays great with the 64 controller, even if it did feel a bit odd the first time I went back to it after about 4 or 5 years.

Nah goldeneye would still get a 8.0 at least.
Avatar image for EolGul2
EolGul2

1721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 EolGul2
Member since 2005 • 1721 Posts
SMW is a little difficult to control with the GC controller though...FLYmeatwad

Buy a classic controller.  It feels almost exactly like the SNES controller and is easily worth the $20.
Avatar image for nintendofreak_2
nintendofreak_2

25896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#12 nintendofreak_2
Member since 2005 • 25896 Posts
I hate how they do it. They should give their original review and then give their second review of it and just average the two out.
 
Avatar image for burfeindt21
burfeindt21

1720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 burfeindt21
Member since 2006 • 1720 Posts
they should do it the way game informer does it have the retro rating and the jus have wat they think it would be now
Avatar image for chris3116
chris3116

12174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 chris3116
Member since 2003 • 12174 Posts

I don't listnen to them or any on reviewers who reviews the VC. I know them. I played them. I know which ones are worth and ones are not. I can make a list right now from the current VC list that it's calling the worth list.

I don't need noob who said something it's not worth when I know it's worth.

Avatar image for senecaboyer88
senecaboyer88

3386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 senecaboyer88
Member since 2005 • 3386 Posts
[QUOTE="FLYmeatwad"][QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="zcds"]they are comparing them to today's standards, how well they hold up and will entertain, just because a game is a classic dosen't mean it's gonna get a good score. they are though but fair .StarFoxCOM
Exactly, and Goldeneye would deservedly get something like 6 even though it was a god in its day.

And still to this day actually plays great with the 64 controller, even if it did feel a bit odd the first time I went back to it after about 4 or 5 years.

Nah goldeneye would still get a 8.0 at least.

too bad its never coming out...
Avatar image for nintendofreak_2
nintendofreak_2

25896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#16 nintendofreak_2
Member since 2005 • 25896 Posts
[QUOTE="StarFoxCOM"][QUOTE="FLYmeatwad"][QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="zcds"]they are comparing them to today's standards, how well they hold up and will entertain, just because a game is a classic dosen't mean it's gonna get a good score. they are though but fair .senecaboyer88
Exactly, and Goldeneye would deservedly get something like 6 even though it was a god in its day.

And still to this day actually plays great with the 64 controller, even if it did feel a bit odd the first time I went back to it after about 4 or 5 years.

Nah goldeneye would still get a 8.0 at least.

too bad its never coming out...

Perfect Dark is better....
Avatar image for senecaboyer88
senecaboyer88

3386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 senecaboyer88
Member since 2005 • 3386 Posts
[QUOTE="senecaboyer88"][QUOTE="StarFoxCOM"][QUOTE="FLYmeatwad"][QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="zcds"]they are comparing them to today's standards, how well they hold up and will entertain, just because a game is a classic dosen't mean it's gonna get a good score. they are though but fair .nintendofreak_2
Exactly, and Goldeneye would deservedly get something like 6 even though it was a god in its day.

And still to this day actually plays great with the 64 controller, even if it did feel a bit odd the first time I went back to it after about 4 or 5 years.

Nah goldeneye would still get a 8.0 at least.

too bad its never coming out...

Perfect Dark is better....

too bad thats not ever coming out either...