I love how some of these executives make sweeping generalizations about sweeping generalizations.
I think that diversity is the key. Not just with video games, but life. I don't want to replace one thing for the other when I can have both. I haven't stopped watching horror flicks just because I dig action movies. I didn't stop reading Stephen King when I got into the Harry Potter books. I haven't stopped listening to rock even though I can dig a little jazz. And I'm sure as hell not going to replace conventional games with non-conventional experiences, eventhough I'll play (and enjoy) both.
EDIT: That's the mistake that all these companies make -- that something is mutually exclusive to another. **** that noise, Jack. I am the ultimate consumer in this sense because I want it all, right now. Don't start telling me what I want; I'll let my wallet do the talking and my palate sort out the rest.
The most recent business model of success came from the PS2, and it showed that gamers really don't want to be stuffed into categories. They want the best of everything. As soon as a company starts placing importance on one group of gamers over another, they're on the path to self-defeat. Follow in the PS2's footprints -- it'll lead straight to the goldmine. Start believing that your system is a mini-game machine, or a shooter platform, or a sports platform and you're doomed. If you want to attain market dominance, anyway.
Log in to comment