Feedbackula - GTA V Review Revulsion

We reviewed Grand Theft Auto V recently, giving it a very impressive 9/10. This made a lot of our community furious, and Johnny has a thing or two to say about it.

Show Info

Feedbackula

Feedbackula

Airs Fridays at 12pm PT

Johnny wades through the very best (and worst) of your comments to find out what's getting the gaming community talking.

12946 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for RastamanG
RastamanG

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I was like wtf when i saw the 9 out of 10, but having completed the game i totally agree with it and here is why


-Only 6 heists and they are all part of the story missions (Only 2 real heists though jewelery shop and Last heist)

-No more buy-able houses

-Short Story only 69 missions

-Whole map isn't used for missions

-No Fighter Jet Missions

-Bugs (garage bug)

-Health does feel like there is enough, yes although it regenerates to make you use use of the cover system, I have often found myself quickly overwhelmed by enemy's and died, grove street is a good example, fire a shot or point a gun at someone and the whole hood is against you.

-Not enough car customization options, yes there is quite a lot but i felt there should be more and not to mention the lack of Nitrous

-Only 4 car garage and One free space at your house + Your characters car. Also Being franklin and buying the los santos customs and having free car mods is kind of annoying with not much space to store them


There are other things but they are the main things i think of

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jaydee1020
jaydee1020

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@RastamanG online ass hole

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hotdogwater66
hotdogwater66

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

And none of those things where mentioned in the review

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blueinheaven
blueinheaven

5554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

This guy completely swerves the fact of all the morally questionable aspects of GTA V to single out Petit decided misogyny was the most offensive because of his/her own personal agenda. I'll tell you what, let's take a minute to think about the stupidity of that...

Yep, it still seems pretty fucking stupid. It's also hypocritical and of course hugely unprofessional.

The sulky indignant stance at the end where he's taking his ball home if we don't play the game his way so NOBODY can play was hilarious.

11 • 
Avatar image for subrawk
subrawk

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@blueinheaven it wasn't the fact that it was morally questionable, it was because she felt alienated by the portrayal of women. can you not see someone enjoying the game a little bit less if she felt alienated by it?

either way though, the critique did not warrant the personal assault that happened after, and that was the point of this feedbackula.

5 • 
Avatar image for blueinheaven
blueinheaven

5554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By blueinheaven

@subrawk @blueinheaven I agree the personal assault was unwarranted but as others said below he chose to highlight the inane, idiotic childish comments and not the intelligent responses which, by the way, were not taking issue with the score but at how the score was decided and why.

If Petit felt alienated by the games portrayal of women he must be incredibily sensitive there are racial communities who had more right to feel aggrieved at how they were protrayed in the game but that didn't fit his personal agenda so he completely ignored it which makes him a hypocrite.

Johnny's defence of this makes him a hypocrite too and his lame attempt to make out most of the complaints were about the score shot his credibility as low as, well, as Petit's. GS has come out of this very badly.

5 • 
Avatar image for TheBlueDrew
TheBlueDrew

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@blueinheaven They've had worst.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gogoleafs
gogoleafs

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@rschafer @subrawk @blueinheaven
Very well said...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blueinheaven
blueinheaven

5554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@Berkut4796 @blueinheaven You have to have a balance, there was no balance there. Johnny implied that the intelligent response did not exist, only the view of morons. I accept that he paid lip service to intelligent human beings at the end of his idiotic soapbox drivel but he OPENED the whole piece up by implying all GS posters are idiots.

The second half of his piece defended Petit against all the personal attacks which is of course perfectrly correct, but ignored the fact the universal derision of his/her review was perfectly justified.

You lost all credibility with the review and have lost it further with this petulant clown telling everyone if you don't like us we make no more Feedbackulas for YOU.

Well, that told us.

2 • 
Avatar image for blueinheaven
blueinheaven

5554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By blueinheaven

@rschafer @subrawk @blueinheaven I suppose we should be grateful they didn't get a cop to review the game :) It would have struggled to get a 5/;10.

2 • 
Avatar image for rschafer
rschafer

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@subrawk @blueinheaven Its not worth mentioning when every single character in the entire game world is portrayed in a bad way. Should cops be offended because every cop in the game is dirty? Even when players are about to exit a bank, there is a clip of cops being d!cks so you don't feel bad about killing them. Thats the point of the game. Everyone is scum in their own way. Its done to be funny and so players don't feel bad about speeding down the streets mowing people down.

A police officer in real life might take offense to that, but a professional critic should be completely aware of the game's atmosphere. Making the point that women aren't shown in a good light is an absolutely terrible point to make when every character is shown in a bad way. Either point out that the game itself is too violent and over the top and all characters are shallow satires of society, or just make real negative point about the game. Don't push a feminist agenda though when it has no base.

2 • 
Avatar image for subrawk
subrawk

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@blueinheaven i don't agree that because the other aspects of the game wasn't viewed under same critical microscope, that it makes the issues she did critique any less relevant or hypocritical. using those examples she did NOT mention is diverting from what WAS actually mentioned, and whether we agree with it or not, it's worth acknowledging in the review of the game.

i'm not saying the other things you mentioned are not worth acknowledging, but that's a separate topic altogether.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Berkut4796
Berkut4796

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@blueinheaven I'd like to point out though that the purpose of this video (which was focused in the later half, the first half kept in line with the show's theme) wasn't to highlight the intelligent responses, it was to highlight the childish ones. This was done for the specific purpose of demonstrating the kinds of comments not acceptable. If Johnny focused on the intelligent ones, he would not have as successfully demonstrated the fact that there was a significant amount of inappropriate comments.

It's also important to note that Johnny did not state that intelligent comments are non-existent. Towards the end, he directly stated that there are people who are distinctly respectful in their comments, even when they are saying that the Gamespot crew is wrong. Johnny notes that they approve of that kind of behaviour, they want your feedback and in doing so acknowledged that people are critiquing things in a productive way.

If your interested in getting more feedback from Gamespot about critiques from the community when these sorts of situations happen, it might be beneficial to create a forum thread or some sort of petition asking for a show or forum thread where a Gamespot employee addresses the critiques (with examples) and fosters appropriate discussion about it. Maybe something good would come out of that :).

3 • 
Avatar image for Ser_Charles
Ser_Charles

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

10 means perfect, and perfect means no imperfection. Does GTA V qualify as being perfect and containing no imperfections?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Ju-noh
Ju-noh

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Ser_Charles


10/10 does not mean perfect. It just means that it's a game that people would recommend to others. If it were to be based off of being perfect then no game would deserve a 10.

2 • 
Avatar image for TheBlueDrew
TheBlueDrew

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Ju-noh @Ser_Charles No it doesn't, we just think that because so many games have been given 10/10 that the score has lost all meaning now. 8/10 is good enough for a recommendation while 10/10 is perfection or so damn near to it that the small faults that the title has are not big enough to make note of.

9/10 is good enough for GTA 5 and the fact that some of us are arguing about it as if it's a bad thing is insane. I swear this fucking industry is full of children. The gamers, the publishers, the developers. EVERYONE!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SSgt_Edward
SSgt_Edward

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Ju-noh @Ser_Charles Then no game would deserve a 10? I say there are plenty of games.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DSCesq
DSCesq

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By DSCesq

@Ju-noh @Ser_Charles Although I agree that a 10/10 doesn't mean the game is perfect, I don't think it simply means that it's a game worth recommending - a 9/10, or even an 8/10, fits that bill pretty good too.

I do think 10/10s are given too frequently, as well.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bottaboomstick
bottaboomstick

2703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Ser_Charles does GTA4?

3 • 
Avatar image for Samus_rules
Samus_rules

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Samus_rules

Ten points to you for having an opinion that differences from the norm. For having a realistic and fair approach to storytelling and character portrayal. That removes the rose tinted glasses and fanboyism of a franchise. What people fail to realise is that you will make the industry go forward, give us stories of depth and universes we can get lost in, because you demand it. It isn't as if it was a bad review either. Credit was given where it was due and others should appreciate that. A review is your opinion not theirs. And if they need their beliefs reaffirmed by a number rating, then their belief mustn't be that great anyway. And to those who made the comments I am ashamed to call myself a gamer for fear of being associated with you.

3 • 
Avatar image for rschafer
rschafer

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By rschafer

@Samus_rules A review is an opinion, but a site like Gamespot pays these people to do professional reviews. This isn't someone's Youtube page. The score is fine but the reason's for the score are reasons that have no business being mentioned other than trying to push a point the reviewer has. The two reasons given were the game is misogynistic and that the characters break from character.

The second point isn't true since the game is an open world game with 3 main characters whose main objective is to make money. The example given was of Franklin helping a guy take photos of celebrities, which he does cause the guy offers to pay him. In a game thats all about not being serious and over the top side characters, the mission fits right in with the rest of the game. 3 criminals with low morals trying to make money. Its open world, so if you don't think your character you're playing would do those side missions, then you don't have to do them. Its what you make it.

But the first point, which was the main negative focus of the review and what has started this whole debate, was that the game is misogynistic. Its a game of criminals, stereotypes, cliches, movie references, and about being over the top. There isn't a single role model in the game nor is there supposed to be. Its a game that has a commercial about rednecks drinking beer and having sex with pigs, an old English couple digging through people's trash for souvenirs, drugged out party Asians, fat lazy pot head video gamers, and cutscenes of thugs calling each other the N word over and over. Trying to say that women aren't shown in a good way in a game like this is the same as saying they aren't in Madden as well. GTA has always been like that and its supposed to be. It makes fun of society and stereotypes and always has. Thats part of its charm.

They could have given the game a 5 out of 10 and gotten less negative feedback as long as they gave real reasons for the score. If you think the driving sucks, or the gun play sucks, or the missions are boring, or the storyline has been done, or any other real complaints about a video game. But choosing those reasons, especially the main one, just looks like someone pushing their own agenda which most people don't feel like hearing about when trying to watch an official review.

And as far as this reply video goes, Feedbackula is a series of videos that makes fun of stupid comments usually posted by 12 year olds. There is always going to be comments like these on the interent. Everyone knows it and most people can just easily ignore them since the people making them are usually kids or even more pathetic adults. Had a regular guy done this same review and gotten the same kind of hate, would we be getting a reply like this defending them and cursing people out. I feel like this video did more damage for that reviewer and kind of made them look like the little sister of the group.

13 • 
Avatar image for gogoleafs
gogoleafs

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@rschafer

Perfectly said...

2 • 
Avatar image for NonaryGamer
NonaryGamer

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Hey, I just created an account on this website to congratulate you for standing up for common decency.

Anyone who defends this game from mysogeny is hopeless. Please note that the main poster for this game is of a a bikini clad woman who as far as I am aware is not even an actual character in the game...
No amount of 'satire' can clear this game of guilt for such a cheap marketing ploy. This game would of sold millions if the leading poster had just been a sports car or even a cityscape shot yet nope, it simply has to be a busty scantily clad woman right? Apparently Rockstar feel this is the image which best summises the game and appeals to it's fanbase. Good for you if it works

Also a 10/10 implies that this this game is a masterpiece with universal appeal. If it decides to marginalise half the potential audience how could it possibly deserve a 10?

5 • 
Avatar image for rogue81
rogue81

922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@NonaryGamer The game marginalizes everyone. The reviewer homed in on the one aspect that was most important to her and simply overlooked everything else; like the extreme racism. No one is saying this game is without sexism, what I'm saying is it's more than a little biased to be upset with how the game treats women, and be cool with how it treats everyone else. Is it equality for all? Or is it make sure the women are safe and comfortable, then tear everyone else apart? If you're thinking "but it isn't equal!" then I challenge you to find one character with strong a strong moral compass that isn't a racial stereotype.

7 • 
Avatar image for bottaboomstick
bottaboomstick

2703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rogue81 @NonaryGamer agreed. the game doesn't just hate women....it hates everyone...equally. it smashes on women, gamers, left side right side, the law enforcement, everyone. What gets me is....IT IS GTA! that's what GTA has done for a long long time. This is nothing new.

7 • 
Avatar image for nigelholden
nigelholden

95

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@NonaryGamer When did a drawing of a women in a bikini equate to misogyny... literally meaning the hate of women? In context, the game takes place in L.A. Seeing a women in a bikini in that area of California on the beach isn't exactly novel. The fact that she is taking a selfie seems to indicate the theme of self obsession and decadence in the current culture, a theme they are expressing. And the series has always used character images representing different aspects of life in the area take place. Most of which are never a playable character in the game.

It's one thing to argue if the portrayal of women characters is sexist in the game, if they are treated different than any other character in terms of how well they are represented, or to what level the satire works, if at all. But to say a drawing, well within context, of a women in a bikini somehow equates to the hatred of women, well that's beyond me.

That said, I personally would not of rated this game higher than a 8. But that's the smallest portion of the conversation.

11 • 
Avatar image for gogoleafs
gogoleafs

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By gogoleafs

@nigelholden @NonaryGamer
i disagree with you only giving it an 8 but dayum you can articulate your points...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Them_Apples
Them_Apples

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@nigelholden @NonaryGamer Nigel, I just realized that from now on, I need to look to see if you have already posted before I bother, because you have generally covered it. This actually has me feeling a bit paranoid. Are you actually IN my brain? If so, please get out. Wait WAIT WAIT. You can stay. That's awesome. No NO. You have to get out. Too creepy...

Anyway, kudos for generally agreeing with me. This means you are generally correct! ;) (That's a joke people - calm down.)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TheZeroPercent
TheZeroPercent

2585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 2

---Johnny is a strange name for a European lesbian

4 • 
Avatar image for FoxHoleUK85
FoxHoleUK85

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Totally agree with this video. I was disgusted with some of the comments made to the reviewer of GTA V.

It's these people who cast a poor shadow over the gaming community.




7 • 
Avatar image for houshidar
houshidar

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@FoxHoleUK85 are you as upset about whats happening in Syria at the moment? or other repressive countries? or that people are starving, exploitation of children in the third world? sex trafficking?

This is all trivial internet ridiculousness in comparison. People are protected by a layer of anonymity on the internet and therefore many show their true colours and their darker side on the internet. There is nothing you nor I can do and definitely nothing gamespot can do regardless of how "offended" this guy may seem. You are better off trying to make a change to real world problems where real people are being devastated, not just some critic that puts themselves out there and should know there will always be a segment of the internet that will dislike them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for FoxHoleUK85
FoxHoleUK85

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@houshidar @FoxHoleUK85 Yes I am but this is a comment section regarding this feedbackula video so I felt it best to stick the topic...

Just because there are countless atrocities occurring throughout the world does'nt mean I or anyone else can't voice our concerns over other "trivial" (your words not mine) issues.

I do agree that there is nothing I myself can do about it but wanted to voice my opinion.


2 • 
Avatar image for houshidar
houshidar

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@FoxHoleUK85 @houshidar Fair enough

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nigelholden
nigelholden

95

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@FoxHoleUK85 What's the gaming community? Is that like the book readers community or television watchers community?

2 • 
Avatar image for bigcrusha
bigcrusha

746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I'm all for Jonny's message, personal attacks have no place in the community, That being said, I wish he took a stance on ALL the reasons people disagreed with the 9.0 score.

He was incredibly biased and far too general, implying that the GLOBAL opinion of the comment section is that GTA is above critique and deserves nothing less than a perfect score.

I have no issues with the score itself, it's the reasons listed that I question. Calling an M rated game "profoundly misogynistic", a game such as GTA with a track record of games that push moral boundaries. This game was practically DESIGNED to offend all sorts of people. From politicians to MADD, hipsters to Anti-racism activists, religion be spared.

While there are some positive life lessons in the main story to be taught, most of the content in a GTA game aren't meant to be taken seriously. To call this game a woman hater is FAR too personal critique. This critique is so incredibly personal that I'll bet if Kevin VanOrd reviewed this entry, the reasons for his score might probably be different.

6 • 
Avatar image for Turn_Into_Ghost
Turn_Into_Ghost

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bigcrusha "This game was practically DESIGNED to offend all sorts of people. From politicians to MADD, hipsters to Anti-racism activists,..."

Except that none of the above have to deal with objectification and the (systematic) denial of equal rights on a, for most women, daily basis.

The way women are portrayed in this game is actually not too far off from how our society sees women and tells men to treat women, unlike the ludicrous amounts of violence, which we all rightfully frown upon in reality.

Yes, GTA is satire, but in this iteration, it does nothing to justify or explain the way it portrays women. They are just there for everyone to rip on, call names at and toy with, without ever giving it any context whatsoever.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gogoleafs
gogoleafs

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By gogoleafs

@Turn_Into_Ghost @bigcrusha

Context?
There are two women at the strip club that won't sleep around because they have boyfriends, and the other two don't always except your offer to go home with them.

Society does not at all see women like that anymore, your wrong. watch when Hillary becomes the first female president in a couple of years.

This is a fucking game Ghost, relax, the GTA series has been doing this for years and it's all in good fun playing a game not real life...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for l777l
l777l

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By l777l

@Turn_Into_Ghost @bigcrusha "Except that none of the above have to deal with objectification and the (systematic) denial of equal rights on a, for most women, daily basis."

Nonsense. Compare life expectancy, health, death on the job, kinds of jobs taken (including working conditions), academic success, quality of relationships and you will be unable to show that women on average are more disadvantaged than men are on average.

As for objectification, it's ubiquitous and largely benign, affecting men as well as women. Objectification means reducing a person to less than their complete elements and aspects. (Not doing so would be inefficient ,and ruinous of much that is enjoyable.) That's what you do when you buy a car from someone, when you have someone serve you dinner in a restaurant, when you have someone collect your garbage, and so forth. Yes, often men merely care about sex -- but they don't necessarily owe another individual more than that. You don't have to marry someone to find them sexually attractive and to permissibly have sexual fantasies. (Do you want to regulate masturbation?) Since men have a greater sex drive they will have such fantasies more often than women, and seek for corresponding fiction more often. (Note that there are also qualitative differences; consider romance novels.) This sex-drive differential actually gives women power over men. Sex differences (simply consider the personality factor "agreeableness") and negotiations will lead to differences in outcomes, differences in who more often holds which "rights" - social positions - and which not.

So no, women overall are not a weaker group than men are, nor does life unfold primarily on the level of groups: there's a great diversity (in respect to preferences and qualities) of individuals, and individuals are free to associate with individuals that are to their liking. Special protection can not be convincingly argued for on summary grounds. I'd like to see you try to do so on particular grounds, on the basis of unique weaknesses.

Check out work by Catherine Hakim (see 'Preference Theory' and 'Erotic Capital'), 'Browne's Biology at Work', Rutgers UP; Brooks, 'He Runs, She Runs' [no Double Bind], Princeton UP; Campbell, 'A Mind of Her Own', 2nd ed., Oxford UP. I also recommend Rosenblum, 'Membership and Morals'.

2 • 
Avatar image for bigcrusha
bigcrusha

746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@Turn_Into_Ghost

I disagree with the "systematic denial of equal rights" thing. Equal rights in "WESTERN" culture is not as big an issue as activists portray it.

Women are now glorified by pop culture. Society has now adopted female sexuality as an idolization. In almost all circumstances, it is the Male obligation to seek the Female.

Rape and spousal abuse lead to near instant conviction in the case where a male does wrong to a female. The ideology is ridiculed roles reverse.

Taxes we pay now allow Women to take maternity leave. Women also now have the choice to work in both the labor sector and the corporate sector.

All and all I think women not having equal rights in Western culture is a myth, sexism by objectification is a problem I DO agree.

Back on your earlier point, GTA does NOTHING to justify or explain ANY of it's vices, not just portrayal of women. The only times GTA V took moral high ground is after a torture mission where Trevor goes into a rant about why torture is stupid. The other would be the 5 star wanted rating system that demonstrates consequence to crime.

Hence the M for mature rating, an adult playing this game is expected to not take GTA's moral subject matter seriously.

5 • 
Avatar image for bottaboomstick
bottaboomstick

2703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Turn_Into_Ghost @bigcrusha and how does it portray men?

i'd say it hates men as much as women wouldn't you? Unless you think murdering psycho women mongers are a good thing.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gogoleafs
gogoleafs

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@Blondezilla11 @bottaboomstick @Turn_Into_Ghost @bigcrusha

Look at this Blonde is coming to the dark side of the force now... :D

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Blondezilla11
Blondezilla11

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Blondezilla11

@bottaboomstick @Turn_Into_Ghost @bigcrusha "Guys like you, tools.. iTools"

I just heard this advert on the car radio and have to agree that this game doesn't like men much more than it likes women lol...

3 • 
Avatar image for MalakTawus
MalakTawus

2720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I just wanted to say that i totaly agree with this Feedbackula's episode, reading some of those reactions was truly pathetic -_-

3 • 
Avatar image for Ju-noh
Ju-noh

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@MalakTawus

I would suggest that you actually look at the page. Most of these are taken out of context or were written by trolls. There are some concerns brought up in the comment section that were ignored. My guess was that it was on purpose.

2 • 
Avatar image for rrhammer
rrhammer

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Vanishing vehicle bug. The first bug of many, probably. There. You happy? Your arguments against the game getting a 9 are now invalid. Go do the usual GTA routine. Carjack, shoot, drive, fight, run over, repeat. Check any GTA 3 or 4 guide for tips on playing this new one.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Blondezilla11
Blondezilla11

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rrhammer ...Plus you can`t go into the clucking bell.... Or buy from vendors that are clearly there (apparently.. I hven't driven that fr yet)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for madprof666
madprof666

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

10/10 means perfect. GTA 5 isn't perfect. NO game is perfect. I don't think ANY game should get 10/10 as it means, by very definition that the game cannot be improved upon. To all you losers making personal attacks (who know nothing about the journalism industry), your all a bunch of faceless pricks. Its just a game. If you enjoy it, great! If you find it distasteful and offensive, then fair enough, I can see your point, but I just enjoy being a gamer. You lot bring us all down, I'm almost ashamed to be part of your community.

4 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5ad5af79a96e8
deactivated-5ad5af79a96e8

606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

@madprof666 Score has to be proportional to what has gone before. How other games have been scored. If you site scores Metal Gear Solid 4 a 10, a game that almost kicked off current-gen. Then gave Grand Theft Auto IV a 10. It's a little odd that other gaming sites are scoring GTA V 10 quoting the game as being a 'masterpiece' and this site scores it down... for things that made the series what it is in the first place.

As for personal attacks, I find it a little hard that a woman who use to be a man is preaching about misogyny. In fact that takes irony to a whole new level. Had the reviewer stated the bad language was an issue and scored it down, I would think yeah it's a bit excessive ...fair point. But for a former man to bleating on a misogyny with regards to a Grand Theft Auto game, takes the mick it really does. Had this been a woman, slightly different story. Misogyny is hating women, are you being serious that somebody reviewing GTA V as a game is going to come away from that and say it's woman hating. Just because there are a few stereotypes. You might as well say it's racist, because Franklin is a typical gangsta from the hood or Trevor is a redneck.


The reviewer looked at GTA with a big chip on their shoulder, not about GTA but about life. That crossed over into the review and had no place. That crossed a line to my mind, when you job is reviewing games. It's not about the score it's about the lack of justification for that score.

5 • 
Avatar image for musalala
musalala

3131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@Fallenlords69 @madprof666

"You might as well say it's racist, because Franklin is a typical gangsta from the hood or Trevor is a redneck"

Basically this, she was cherry picking GTA V shits on eveyone equally.

The cherry on top for me is Gone home scored 9.5 with ZERO negatives, despite it having numerous ( brevity, zero replay, too expensive to name a few) but she conveniently ignores them.

3 •