This game is actually much better than Gamespot's review, based on my opinion. True, it has some major problems as mentioned, such as the long loading time and the multiplayer part. However, assuming that u are mostly interested into the single player missions only, it could still be called a good game. Indeed, I can see that the producer did put an effort in making this game, unlike some others who just rip off money by making games with the least amount of resource. First about, the graphic is merited to have a score between 7 to 8. I have seen games with poorer graphic while gamespot still gave a higher score. Some particular parts are actually quite amazing, such as the stopping-bullet-effect. Secondly, although the AI is not as smart as the best one u saw from a great game, it could still be called "OK". Thirdly, the game takes about 10 hours to finish, which is merely "a bit" short. At last, the story is rather quite interesting, but unfortunately it didn't have a nice plot development so lot of potentials are wasted. I have played many great FPS games such as MOH, Battlefield, F.E.A.R, etc. Still, I find this game worth playing. It seems to be that when a game has a few serious problems (which may or may not be important for some players), Gamespot tends to downgrade every aspect of the game. I rather find it unfair and therefore I post this review.
Whats better than a headshot followed by a pool of ? or maybe... How about missled from a submarine? Whether its on foot or a rail mission this game goes everywhere. underwater above water wha... Read Full Review
Yeah, the voice acting is crappy...I agree with Synthfreak [by the way learn some grammer and spelling] they do sound like hillbillies, but the voice acting is as bad as Farcry and that didn't stop me from enjoying the ... Read Full Review
