Jack of all trades master of none.

User Rating: 5 | The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-Earth II PC
I saw a lot of good press on this and it reminded me a lot of Total War from what I saw, but in the end its just another old school RTS. Its like Warcraft 3 with a bad attempt at large map turn based system tossed in like Total War, key word like.

It handles just like any RTS that uses swords and arrows instead of guns and tanks, except now its in LotR setting, and they come out in platoons instead of one by one. Oh they can level, but in the end its style the same old dated RTS tactics, you need to outnumber, or outclass the enemy to win.

I got no real beef with that, played plenty of RTS like that Warcraft, Age of Empires and so forth, my beefs with the fact the war of the ring mode is just awful. I expected more, even if I just have one hero I can build a base on disputed land and turtle up and try to churn out an army right there to win the land. which also makes manual battles take a lot of time unless you got enough troops to simply zerg the enemy base at the start.

I gave it a 5 since its not bad, just nothing really screams epic like the other reviews tried to boast. Maybe its becuase I've been playing strategy games since Age of Wonders, and Warcraft 1, and to me its really not that new, platoon style troops are staples now to make organizing easier, and heroes were new back when Warcraft 3 came out lol