Review

Bloodshot Review: A Sci-Fi/Superhero Frankenstein Mash-Up That Should Have Never Risen

  • First Released Mar 13, 2020
    released
  • movie

The Vin Diesel-starring comic book adaptation Bloodshot will leave you scrambling to find a chaser.

When trying to come up with possible reasons why Bloodshot exists, it's difficult not to descend into cynicism. This is a movie that seems designed to cash in on a dubious combination of copy-catting Marvel and DC's successes on the big screen, and Vin Diesel's modest star power, which can potentially draw the same crowds who flock to each new Fast and the Furious movie (including us). And Bloodshot isn't a completely worthless imitation--it smartly leaves a lot of the original Valiant comics' cheesy trappings (white skin, red chest, red eyes) in the past where they belong, and it's built on a really fun (albeit moronic) sci-fi conceit that brings with it plenty of cool visual effects and inventive action set pieces.

But those are all things we've seen before at the cinema, and Bloodshot does little to set itself apart from the last 25 years of superhero movies. It's a supremely stupid movie, in the very literal sense that it rarely, if ever, makes any sense--the kind of movie that begs you over and over to simply "turn off your brain" and enjoy the machismo spectacle. But idling your brain low enough to "enjoy Bloodshot for what it is" might do permanent damage.

Vin Diesel's Ray Garrison is a soldier who, when he's not taking out bad guys and rescuing hostages all over the world, savors picturesque romantic getaways with his beautiful wife. Of course, things are actually a lot more complicated than that, but the movie takes a long time to get to its big "twist." In case you want to go into this movie completely blind, I'll mark this as a spoiler--but everything discussed here is explicitly laid out in the trailer: Garrison is actually an unknowing operative of a private paramilitary corporation that repeatedly implants him with false memories of his wife being murdered in front of him, then sets him loose on what he thinks are vendettas but are actually assassinations. They wipe him clean every time, tweaking and tuning the fabricated memories and their own performances as they prepare to sell "weaponized revenge" to the highest bidder.

On top of that, they've replaced Garrison's blood with billions of "nanites," microscopic machines that lend him superpowers and can repair any organic damage to his body in a matter of seconds. "Project Bloodshot," as he's dubbed, is like Wolverine on even more steroids; a meathead with a cybernetically enhanced heart of gold. Diesel is, naturally, perfect for the role, and he manages to squeeze in a dimension of vulnerability to the character that makes him likable in spite of everything.

Bloodshot's lengthy opening act as it builds toward the reveal is almost unbearably stupid--and, admittedly, deliberately so. Once it gets there, the idiocy takes on a different tone. Bloodshot cribs liberally from a wide variety of better movies, starting out in the realm of 1992's Van Damme and Lundgren-starring Universal Soldier, before eventually transforming into more of a knock-off MCU by way of later Fast and Furious movies, with a hint of Groundhog Day for good measure.

Diesel is surrounded by an able cast doing their best with dopey dialogue and scenarios. Eiza González, Sam Heughan, and Alex Hernandez portray the other members of Garrison's "squad," each with their own, fun cybernetic enhancement. González's character KT, for example, breathes through an aperture installed in the center of her chest, rather than through her trachea and mouth.

To give you an idea of how dumb Bloodshot truly is: When, at one point, KT's breathing implant briefly stops working, the character spends a few moments in the aftermath gasping for breath--through her mouth. That's not even mentioning the fact that although the movie could use KT's condition as a thin excuse to explain why she dresses almost exclusively in revealing, skin-tight crop tops, instead it just doesn't even bother.

Guy Pearce is the man in charge who orchestrates the whole scheme, although he never really sells his character's villainy. Siddharth Dhananjay (from Amazon's excellent rotoscope-animated Undone) plays the chief developer behind the Bloodshot tech, though he mostly exists to have several jokes made about his apparently small penis, and so he can get one-upped by the superior hacker Wilfred Wigans, played by New Girl's Lamorne Morris. Wigans is the source of most of the movie's genuine laughs, and Morris at least seems like he's having fun, even if most of his gags, like trying to speed-eat Chinese food while action scenes happen around him or talking to himself while doing generic hacking stuff, are essentially nonsequiturs that have little to do with the other characters or what's actually going on in the movie.

Most of the characters' motivations are, at best, unclear; at worst, they seem to actively contradict those characters' personalities and/or stated goals. The whole movie operates under the weird conceit that there are no real consequences for anything that happens; this private group is orchestrating hits all over the world, causing large-scale destruction everywhere they go, but there's never any discussion of collateral damage, innocent bystanders, or intervention from any form of government. Granted, that would definitely detract from the fun tone Bloodshot most often goes for, which it does occasionally achieve in isolated moments of blockbuster levity.

No Caption Provided

The nanites themselves provide plenty of fodder for cool visuals and effects. There are even some elements of body horror as Garrison sustains increasingly outlandish wounds, like getting half his face blown off, only for the nanites to swarm there and reconstruct it as we watch.

Bloodshot might not be entirely faithful to the original design of the comic book character (and I'm glad that Vin doesn't have a big red circle in the middle of his chest), but there are some nods for fans. The nanites burn neon red when they're doing repairs, causing Garrison's chest to light up like a blood-tinged Iron Man. In one scene, Garrison gets covered in flour, causing him to appear ashy white, which feels perfunctory. Later, once he gains better control of the nanites, his skin turns white as if drained of blood when he's concentrating them on specific tasks, which sometimes involves sending them out of his body entirely. How he continues to walk around when that's happening is as much a mystery as any other choice in this movie, like how nanites that repair your flesh somehow turn you into a walking tank who takes bullets to the chest without so much as flinching.

If you're asking these questions--as I did--you've already overthought Bloodshot. If Vin Diesel and a goofy sci-fi/superhero mash-up premise are enough to get your nanites pumping, then by all means, enjoy. Otherwise, Bloodshot will simply leave you cold.

Back To Top

The Good

  • Vin Diesel is great as the meatheady but likable hero
  • Cool and inventive visual effects
  • Fun sci-fi concept at its core

The Bad

  • Dialogue and plot are dumb as rocks
  • Plagued by inconsistencies, from character motivations to abilities
  • Interminable first act that makes the movie seem even dumber than it actually is
  • Does little to differentiate itself from better movies it imitates
  • Gets real male gazey whenever Eiza González is onscreen

About the Author

Mike Rougeau is GameSpot's Managing Editor of Entertainment. He watched Bloodshot at a press screening in Los Angeles.
26 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for jsprunk
jsprunk

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

Comic book movies generally suck imo, with few exceptions. This is one Vin Diesel movie I'll be skipping.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for lionheartssj1
lionheartssj1

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Is "male gazey" the same thing we see in the MCU movies when the ripped up men do their shirtless scenes? I try, but sometimes I'm behind on the new lingo.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for louixiii
LouiXIII

10052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By LouiXIII

Can't say I didn't see this one coming. I'm still going to check it out. Maybe rent it. At this time, the sequel to Joker could hit theaters and I'd still keep my arse at home. 9 cases of CV19 reported in my state and just the other day there were none.

Nah...I got Pop Secret and Netflix BABY!!!

xD

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

15919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 5

can't a lady be sexy on screen anymore? are we back in the dark ages?

5 • 
Avatar image for louixiii
LouiXIII

10052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sakaixx: A guy and a girl just had sex with the son of Dracula at the same time and it was animated at that. No...these are definitely not the dark ages anymore. Matter of fact, sell me a ticket to the dark ages. I'll be the first person in line.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jsprunk
jsprunk

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

@louixiii: Bring your summer clothes. The climate was way hotter in the Dark Ages than it is now.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for louixiii
LouiXIII

10052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jsprunk: Cool. I'll bring some sunscreen too lol

Upvote • 
Avatar image for alastor529
alastor529

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

this has the comment son but not your politically outrageous take on The Hunt?

2 • 
Avatar image for judaspete
judaspete

7270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

I mean, the previews look like crap, so I can't say this review surprises me.

2 • 
Avatar image for s1taz4a3l
s1taz4a3l

918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Am guessing if Diesel replaced all his lines for "i am groot" on this movie it would be breaking box office records.

Another nail on Diesel coffin, shoulda learn to be humble like dwayne johnson. There is a reason Dwayne is making 15+ mill per movie.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for thelostscribe
Thelostscribe

2023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Thelostscribe

@s1taz4a3l: Eh, Diesel seems cool enough. Dwayne has never done a role where he really challenges his acting chops these days, he's the same guy in every film. It just so happens that a lot of people like the most electrifying man in entertainment's personality.

Besides that, Dwayne wasn't very humble about his Skyscraper movie failing domestically.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sparent180
SParent180

966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@thelostscribe: "It just so happens that a lot of people like the most electrifying man in entertainment's personality."

That's the thing with him. Who knows how humble he actually is and with his success I can't really blame him if he isn't humble, dude worked his ass off to be where he is, but his personality and how he presents himself just makes him a likeable person the I feel like most people gravitate to. Seems like a dude that would be a blast to hang out with.

Vin Diesel doesn't have the same type of personality and his acting isn't anything special either. I just get the sense that while someone like Dwayne has a personality that sucks people in, Vin Diesel is more of a type that would push people away. Not judging that actual person they are more just the vibe I get from the two of them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for thelostscribe
Thelostscribe

2023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Thelostscribe

@sparent180: Vin usually plays a loaner or a cool/tough guy in films, but from what I've seen from social media and what not, he seems like he really enjoys what he does and really likes to connect with his co-stars. No one really spilled the particulars of the beef with Johnson and Diesel, but I'm confident it had to do with the 'new guy' coming in and really grabbing a lot of attention, the Studio even pushing back one of the main movies for his spin off. Still, they seemed to have worked it out.

The Rock isn't that great of an actor either in my opinion, but his persona brings people in, it has since he became The Rock. I like the guy, but if you've seen Walking Tall, The Rundown(one of my favorites) and Scorpion King, you've seen all his characters. Pain and Gain may be his most impressive role though, that was a good movie.

Still, there was a time Dwayne wouldn't even talk about wrestling and his movies were pretty hit or miss. He's corrected that now and no doubt the guy works hard for the success he's got. Likewise, he seems to really appreciate his fans and genuinely gets along with people.

2 • 
Avatar image for daidochus
Daidochus

1835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

Edited By Daidochus

"Gets real male gazey whenever Eiza González is onscreen"

What's that even suppose to mean? LOL, damn nowadays a lady cant be looking sexy on the screen. LOL, I loveee these kinds of reviews keep them coming, gives me at least something to laugh at.

6 • 
Avatar image for doodoflife
doodoflife

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@daidochus: same guy who wanted the Lion King to be the Lion Queen.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for alastor529
alastor529

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@daidochus: Oh you think this is bad look at his revie for The Hunt lmao and how he goes a hole paragraph saying taking the middle road on poltics doesnt make sense and there is only one good side in this culture war lmao

3 • 
Avatar image for alex33x
alex33x

1910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

@daidochus: It's social justice at it's finest brother.

Now a days, all critics give bad review to movies, that dont align with their political agenda and sadly Gamespot has gone full SJW for a while now. Not that the movie looks great, but for years now, I only pay attention to audience scores and ignore critics.

4 • 
Avatar image for ThePlantain
ThePlantain

850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@alex33x: Yup. Gamespot isn't even as bad as they were some years ago. Every game review was full of SJW nonsense at one point. I think they had a purge and a bunch of them left lol

4 • 
Avatar image for flyingmonkeygod
FlyingMonkeyGod

1

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@alex33x: Agreed. I still read reviews, but the first moment that the critic decides to show how woke they are by virtue signaling something, I stop caring what the reviewer has to say. I mean really "Male Gazey"?

5 • 
Avatar image for phatsanta
phatsanta

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By phatsanta

@flyingmonkeygod: you guys need to step out of your echo chambers for a bit, it's lazy ass writing when character is just eye candy, I completely agree with the male gazey use.

3 • 
Avatar image for alex33x
alex33x

1910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

@phatsanta: Awww that's cute, did we hit one of your triggers?

Upvote •