wallpaper42's forum posts

Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

185

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
The base cost of the consoles doesn't bother me that much, it's the $60 for one game is what's really making me pist.
Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

185

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
No I already had a 360 and it gave me buyer's remorse... Try to sell it in your local classifieds. That's what I did and some little kids with their Dad bought it (along with a few games and some accesories) for $500 bucks I think. That was a year ago though.
Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

185

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
Sorry about that...
Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

185

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
Not sure, I haven't played it yet. It does look like it might be good though, I might get it on PC. But why do you need it at this moment when you have MGS4?!
Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

185

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
[QUOTE="wallpaper42"][QUOTE="mtron32"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]

[QUOTE="wallpaper42"]I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?mtron32

I think Frontlines had 50 players but apparently it sucked.

60 player online isnt a plus. Do you really have 29 friends you can forma team with that all have headsets and copies of the game and are on at the same time you are? 5 on 5 is enough

Why does your team have to only be your friends? I just like huge maps and massive battles. But I guess 60 player online wouldn't be very awesome for XBL unless you mute the voice recieve volume. There would probably be at least 15 children on your team screaming profanity at the top of their lungs.

precisely my point, and why play a team game if you CANT hear your teamates?Massive battles are fun for about 10 minutes and then its just silliness, getting killed seconds after you spawn is never fun even if you're really good.Also, I never play team games with strangers, only with my friends otherwise, whats the point?

Why do you need to hear your teammates to have fun?

Not if the maps are large.

The convenience of playing against other humans without having to wait for your friends and meeting people on the game.

Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

185

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
[QUOTE="wallpaper42"]

[QUOTE="ma7moud93"][QUOTE="Zoso-8"]Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:CreepyBacon

Having more players online doesn't mean its better.

Well it sure makes it a hell of a lot better.

And yet gears of war is the more popular game and has the larger online community, even after all this time. I suppose that doesn't matter because your opinion is right huh?

The 360 needs no FPS, gears 2 will do what Gears 1 did and steal the spotlight, Sonys about a year late to the FPS party.

I didn't mean that the number of players online was the only thing that mattered to rating how good a game is. But it is definitely a factor. Don't you think Gears would be more fun if the online supported more than 8 players?! And if it had some larger maps so that it wasn't complete chaos, but still more intense and hectic?!

Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

185

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts

[QUOTE="Zoso-8"]Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:ma7moud93
Having more players online doesn't mean its better.

Well it sure makes it a hell of a lot better.

Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

185

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]

[QUOTE="wallpaper42"]I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?mtron32

I think Frontlines had 50 players but apparently it sucked.

60 player online isnt a plus. Do you really have 29 friends you can forma team with that all have headsets and copies of the game and are on at the same time you are? 5 on 5 is enough

Why does your team have to only be your friends? I just like huge maps and massive battles. But I guess 60 player online wouldn't be very awesome for XBL unless you mute the voice recieve volume. There would probably be at least 15 children on your team screaming profanity at the top of their lungs.

Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

185

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
I don't know what you're talking about. That's how my Crysis looks (maybe a little better) on a 8600GT with medium-high settings lol. And it is playable.
Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

185

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts

[QUOTE="wallpaper42"]I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?TheRealMC01

But how about 100 vs. 100?

http://www.xbox360fanboy.com/2006/05/06/cross-platform-huxley-to-support-100-vs-100-battles/

Oh yeah, forgot all about Huxley. I guess I'll believe that when the game comes out.