According to you, a game that gets an 8 is a quality game. If so, there are plenty of quality games still coming out during the end of this gen's cycle so your statement "The Last of Us proved to developers and publishers alike that quality can still matter" is a clearly fabrication designed to sway any passersby to believe your article has any weight. It's pretty insulting to say that other devs don't believe in putting quality in their games especially just so you can misdirect the negative attention away from you and to their publishers.
This guy wants to call a game a "transformative experience" but gives it an 8? A game that can transform me and make me different from before I play and after is definitely worth more than an 8. It's kinda like how his terrible review of Transformers: WFC, that was filled with errors to the point he had to pull and revise the article, transformed my opinion of him and Gamespot as a credible source for reviews. In terms of bad reviews, that one gets a 9/10. Sure as heck aren't ridiculous standards for me to expect a reviewer to get the name of the game and the core gameplay mechanic right rofl.
Eh? All I see is the systems taking turns being lighter/brighter than the other. The only exception is AC2; there's a slight haze on the 360 version. Oh well, its nowhere near as bad as the haze on the PS3 version of Bayonetta. My eyeballs want to throw up when I see it.
vgbum's comments