I'm entitled to have a view contrary to that of fans of the game, otherwise what is the point of writing a review? If a game has shortcomings people should know about it so that they can make an informed decision on the product before they buy it. I wrote a review on Zelda for the Wii and made sure not to unfairly abuse the game or use bad language, keeping within the Gamespot's Communityterms of service agreement. If possible i would like my review reposted or sent to meif it at allstill exists. Rampant fanboyism is just as bad as trolling, it doesn't give an accurate depiction of the game and it's not a review. If something's good explain how/why it is good, if it's bad you should be able toexplain why without fear of it being taken down because it'll rock the boat. I can understand reviews that say a game's bad being taken down if it has no evidence as to why, but mine did. And i didn't give it a score of 1 either, i think i gave it a 4 or something which i think is a fair score. Anyway, i just wont bother writing reviews if they're just going to be deleted for being too honest.