Is this like some kind of reverse psychology that EA is trying on gamers. It seems like they are always saying the exact opposite what most gamers think about them. Either that or they are just telling gamers how they should feel and hoping that were that stupid and just take them for there word.
@Higurashinoni Until they no longer support online and I wont be able to re-download it, and you can only have two PS3 attached to each game so I guess I'm screwed. Regardless I really dont care so whatever.
@Higurashinoni @shureshot24 Cool for japan then they can keep support up IN JAPAN. However it helps that the next console can at least continue to support the games that are DIGITAL. Its understandable that a new console is not backwards compatible with hard-copy games, but digital games should not be like that. This is the problem with Digital Games. If you gonna make digital only games then you better make sure the next console is compatible. There gonna recharge for them. and its kinda bull.
@Higurashinoni @shureshot24 Ya I know but your talking about PSP support continuing and the reason for that is because PS Vita plays PSP games. Otherwise do you really think SONY would keep support up for those games. PS3 is not as lucky. Thats my issue here. To me it sounds like they are going to re-release them at 10$ a pop in the future. Just like PS1 and PS2 games on PS3. As far as hard copy games I could care less.
@Higurashinoni @shureshot24 Of course not what I'm saying is that if you want to play it on PS4 they will charge you again just like PS2 and PS1. Also in the future when the PS3 is no longer supported with online how am I supposed to play these games. How many PS3's do I need to do that so I don't ever have to re-download them. Really I don't care but its the truth.
So games cant be Violent, Military Shooters, or legacy Nintendo games without approval of THE Mc SHEA.
TOM HAS SPOKEN CAST OUT ALL OTHER OPINIONS BEFORE POSTING HERE. These controversy articles he writes are just here to get hits. I feel ashamed to have clicked on this article. I respect your opinion but at least wait awhile before putting up another controversy article or get someone else tor write it. He cant be the only one who writes at this site.
Still haven't played it yet but it looks like Devil May Cry to me. I might pick it up when its like 20$, but I was done with the games after 4 (wasent a big fan of the new guy but still an ok game). While I don't mind the new approach or even Dante's new look, I still don't understand why this game needed a reboot. So what if the original games where a childish and the story was a confusing mess, that was the appeal and charm of the game. Sometimes I just want to play a game and nuts to the story, whatever gets me from point A to point B, and its a non-stop barrage of action, that's all I care about. Why cant Dante just spit out one liners and make bad jokes, that's what made him awesome. He was a crazy action character for a crazy action game, no more no less. This is the same thing that has been happening in movies as of late, otherwise known as the dark and gritty remake. Dante is now dark and tortured dealing with personal hardship over the death of someone or over some great secret or whatever. Its not that I don't want a good story in my games or great characters to latch onto, I just don't feel like every game needs that to be great. Anyway I will play this when I get the chance but for now I will wait.
shureshot24's comments