rmartinezdl's comments

Avatar image for rmartinezdl
rmartinezdl

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By rmartinezdl

@hellgast0 that is not true, while I do agree some changes we bash them its because we know when something is just not right, and in any case, choice is the way to go, not force something down peoples throats, if human kid opposed to a good change as you say we would have opposed to smartphones, or ipods, or laptops, or wireless, but in this case, they are trying to force a shinny piece of hardware that barely does what it claims, so well yeah, sorry if I dont want that.


Look at what PS is doing, im not saying their ps4 camera is better, if its as good as the playroom claimed, it will be known, and then we will buy it, because IT WORKS, kinect 1.0 didnt sold because it didnt work.


So yeah, microsoft is bundling Kinect 2.0 because they invested so much money on a worthless piece of hardware and hell no they'll let go $100 from every console.

Avatar image for rmartinezdl
rmartinezdl

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By rmartinezdl

@hellgast0 @rmartinezdl sure bro, thats why everyone is so excited about the kinect 2.0, cant you see? everyone wants it! and the games EVERYONE IS EXCITED ABOUT THE GAMES!

Avatar image for rmartinezdl
rmartinezdl

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Geardudu @zintarr uhm its nothing like that, controllers are NEEDED in order for the console to work, while the KINECT IS NOT NEEDED, NOR WANTED.


Avatar image for rmartinezdl
rmartinezdl

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The kinect 1.0 failed so much because it sucked, remember all those trailers? yeah no game was even close to any of their trailers, so they claiming KINECT 2.0 is so awesome, coming from microsoft and only microsoft? yeah, no thanks.

Avatar image for rmartinezdl
rmartinezdl

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@inscript Its all about choice, if its so good as they say, people will buy it eventually, but what if it sucks? you paid for it anyways, so only microscam wins.

Avatar image for rmartinezdl
rmartinezdl

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

But he didnt said: "we are making a game thats NOT pay to win".

He only said its high quality, canceling my pre-oprder, oh wait....

Avatar image for rmartinezdl
rmartinezdl

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I am glad, saints row IV is just pure fun, so was Saints Row 3. 1 million copies is a small number though, I am glad they managed to keep the budget low and deliver a fun and entertaining experience.

Meanwhile at Square Enix, 3.8mil NOT ENOUGH.

Avatar image for rmartinezdl
rmartinezdl

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

CoD is the new Hotwheels for kids, they ask for CoD these days instead of Hasbro toys, thats the only reason you sell billions.

Avatar image for rmartinezdl
rmartinezdl

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By rmartinezdl

Competition is good? Rememer how EA did not played fair when NFL 2K5 was kicking their ass? **** EA.

Avatar image for rmartinezdl
rmartinezdl

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Sun-Tzu-GE @Tamim omfg rofl!!