The best is still yet to come from both companies. biggest triple AAA games of any year this generation, 3d gaming, motion controls and dont forget price drops.
[QUOTE="TintedEyes"] Nah that over complicates things, people just want a graphics king that's it, and its awarded to the best looking game, no need to go overboardPAL360
So graphics king isn't really to prove which console is more powerful?
Going by his logic, even the Wii can have a graphics king. Well, i think technical aspects are what decides what system is more powerfull and Reach already looks the most technically impressive game on a console. Anyway, as i allways say, PS3 and 360 are at the same technical level
I use to think PS3 was the most powerful console until this january after i seen Mass Effect 2, Metro and Halo Reach. Right now God of War 3 is the best looking game i think ive seen though.
all i can say now is fixed camera and 10 ai on screen with simple path finding versus FPS camera 59 ai complicated path navigation and hughe enviorments.
xOMGITSJASONx
40ish and I know for a fact that GOW 3 has atleast 12 enemies on screen.
Thats just a cop out if Reach doesnt look better than KZ2. Your faulting a dev cause they make games different? If thats the case Bungie is poo cause a mod on crysis lets you blow up 1000's of barrels at the same time. Don't make excuses. If Reach doesnt look better it doesnt. When Reach releases if it looks better it will. Eyes not hearts is what i judge graphics with.
No sir I was not trying to fault anybody or anything. Im just pointing to the fact GOW 3 can produce those graphics because its much less processing intensive than Killzone Uncharted and or Reach.
all i can say now is fixed camera and 10 ai on screen with simple path finding versus FPS camera 59 ai complicated path navigation and hughe enviorments.
Log in to comment