ummm my reason is sony's marketing is terrible,killzone 1 was really bad! ps3 itself doesnt sell that well! because of price! and the game is not a halo type of game!
damedash122
-There was an article somewhere stating that Sony would market KZ2 to hell and back. You can just assume this as rumor, but it can happen.
-Just because KZ1 was bad doesn't mean KZ2 will also be bad.
-Can't argue that the Xbox 360 is selling better than the PS3. Then again, I don't really know.
-Gears 2 isn't a Halo type game, and it sold well.
[QUOTE="st1ka"] wait how does removeing blur help insertig hi-rez textures? shouldn't it do just opposite?st1ka
I have no idea what I'm talking about, but I'm going to take a stab in the dark anyway. Mabye if instead of using the processing power to deal with motion blur effects, they could instead use it to display higher resolution textures? I can't imagine motion blur actually uses much anyway, it's been used for such a long time now it must be a huge trade off for what it's worth.
the thing is motion blur actually helps taking a load off the processing power, in other words the more blur the better a game runs I never knew that, actually. Just making assumptions. It can't hurt to wonder, now, can't it?
I'm just assuming that the only ones that really think motion blur is not good are fanboys trying to mark down KZ2. I mean, if Guerilla Games wanted to, I believe they could take out motion blur and add in hi-rez textures instead. But, instead, they decided to keep motion blur.
I suppose it doesn't. You can't deny, however, that the game looks great. :P I just hope that the main characters don't act too "manly". Or perhaps that's just with Rico...
Log in to comment