After the first two were discovered, I did some more digging and found it to be Rage Of Mages 2. Anyone who likes a good RPG with strategic elements and also beautiful graphics I highly recommend!

I have to disagree with you, I don't think you can really compare Call of Duty to Battlefield.

I was a huge Call of Duty fan back in the day, CoD1, CoD4MW, CoDMW2 and Black Ops2 are my personal favorites. Since the first game, it was constantly evolving, focusing on small scale tactical squad battles (S&D) on rather small maps. But since black ops they took it to a different direction. You could see that in Black Ops 2 but in BO3 it was really obvious. Black Ops 3 is fast paced, youre always jumping and running to places and it feels like its taken the place of unreal tournament and freestyle shooters like it, in the gaming community and the professional leagues. With one exception, Call Of Duty:United Offensive, CoD was never like battlefield. They both played very differently since the beginning. If anything, the Battlefield series added a single player campaign mode only to compare to CoD.

Battlefield is what it is, a Battlefield. Conquest mode is epic, and its really immersive in both battlefield 1942 and battlefield 4 and I enjoyed these two battlefield games the most. But when you scale the combat down to squad TDM and objectives, I can hardly say I had as much fun as in Black Ops 2.

In my opinion, if you compare battlefield to anything it should be ArmA, planetside 2 or maybe even Halo (at least the older ones, i only played halo1 and 2 online). And Call Of Duty is best to be compared with probably TitanFall and Medal Of Honor.

One thing I will say about each series as a whole, if you insisnt on comparing themCall Of Duty produced some poor games (CoD3, CoDMW3 and AW were terrible online shooters and Ghosts was just a recycled game) and every battlefield game was rather good and enjoyable, even battlefield vietnam. Battlefield devs also create a ton of content. a lot more than in CoD, in terms of everything. Still I think that if you want to compare the effort the devs put in games and how much of that effort is dedicated to the good of the fans and not money, there are a lot of games that surpass both CoD and Battlefield.

hey guys, ive been struggling to remember three games, all three are hard. This is a challenge and I dont expect much outcome.
thanks in advance though!!!

1. This one I have most info about. time frame 1997-2001.

its a third person horror game. you can choose i think two characters, male or female each with his own weapon. you collect pistols which you can fire. you fight mainly monsters in a 16th century atmosphere. you chase a mad professor if im not mistaken throughout the whole game. I remember playing this game while also playing age of empires 1 rise of rome expansion.

2. same time frame 1997-2001, you start in a dungeon with zombies, really reminds me of diablo. you had like 3-4 classes i think. I mainly remember it was a darker version of diablo, you had to use the torch like all the time. for some reason i remember that the name of the game is Resident Evil, but its impossible of course. maybe its something with evil....

3. 1996-1999 . an rpg with strategy elements. this one is really hard because it sounds like all the other ones around. you had mages, knights and archers at your disposal, it was rts style controls i think. the equipment and inventory were really nice i remember, and you could see the character with the equipped gear. I always remember id strip down the female mage (i was young dont judge me lol). i remember starting out i think with a mage and a knight, no character creation, they were fighting orcs or goblins maybe. you start out with really nice gear i think. really thats all i can remember.