@_planet Yeah, a civil uprising in the wake of political oppression is super boring. I don't mind if you insult the game, but calling it boring is pretty dumb, especially because it's a dramatization of a real thing that happened, and the real thing certainly wasn't boring.

I've only played AC1, AC2, and Revelations, but I think I will add this one to that list as long as all that feminism crap doesn't ruin the game.

Wow, they have got you by the balls! You claim that the base game is good content-wise to begin with (which it really isn't, they had half of that DLC ready when the game released) then you go on to claim that the game is significantly worse without premium. So you contradicted yourself and also stated that a person who wants a good Battlefield experience must pay over a hundred dollars.

You must be either be a complete pushover or such a diehard fan that you're actually blind to how unreasonable the system is. It's people like you that are letting big budget multi player shooters turn into these half-assed annually cranked out ripoffs.

You even somehow manage to complement battle packs and double xp? Seriously? These items are so reminiscent of a pay-to-win free downloadable, even after someone has shoveled over $110 just to access the full game!

I don't know how you can still see your decision to buy premium as a good one. I'm really dumbfounded by that. I hope you come to your senses before Battlefield becomes another 12-year-old's Christmas present every single year with the same crap every single time until everyone's so sick of it that the series just stops.

This... Really should... Have been in... The game to... Begin with... DUM DUM DUM, DA DUM DUM. DUM DUM DUM, DA DUM DUM. Nope nope nope I ain't paying money for this crap. Looks like EA's plan to take CoD's throne is falling apart. Next AAA multiplayer shooter I buy will be Battlefront, screw Battlefield Hardline, screw Advanced Warfare, nope nope nope.

I haven't even been a victim of BF4's infamous performance issues, it always puts me in a game that doesn't lag and I never crash (probably because my PC is up to spec and I deliberately join low-ping servers) but the thing that's driving me away is the garbage 5-DLC system that gives me about a third of the game to begin with. SCREW IT. No more. None.

@silversix_ Old joke. Really old.

@crusaderprophet When exactly did the series falter? I don't think they've released a game that has outright failed... ever.

@Meatwad650 Actually, it will look way worse on all systems because this is Ubisoft and they lie about the graphics before their games come out.

Haha just kidding. I think it will look best on PC obviously, but the thing they nailed graphics-wise is the lighting and color pallets, so it will look great across the board. It's something most developers really screw up, but I guess not with this game.

My point was that they are trying to imply that they are the only people who have done something like this. THEY are using procedure. THEY aren't random. THEY are different. There is a clear implication that they are doing something never successfully attempted before, and the smug ways they present this idea is just awful.

I don't like to use this word, but holy hell is this video pretentious. With the whole "oh it's not random, it's procedural" crap, implying "randomly generated" games like Minecraft and Endless Space don't use mathematical algorithms, they're just trying to put themselves above other games in the genre by pretending that they've created something new. ALL randomly generated games can be considered procedural. Every single one. Then they just rant for ten minutes about this idea trying to shove it down everyone's throats how incredibly unique and different and better they are. Horrible.

@slappy54 On a similar note, I think that game is exploiting its inherent indie-ness to gain sales. Looks stupid to me.