I think it is rediculous that games are based on things like graphics and sound, or should I say the technical stuff. I mean seriously, graphics don't make games, gameplay does, and if a game has good gameplay then yeah its a good game and therefore should have a higher score. I mean 8.8 for a zelda game, come on, thats bull 5H17. Just because it had crappy sound, and maybe it didn't "evolve" enough, that doesn't mean its a bad game, doesn't mean it should get rated down because it is basically the same as some of the predecessors. They should rate games based individually without looking at past games in that series as a comparison on how the game has "evolved."
man if melee had 26 or 25 charactars wii is gonna have like 50
now wouldnt that be cool
insanewolfninja
that would be so cool. i agree. i mean smash bros for the n64 had what like 10 or 12 characters, melee had 25, thats more than a 50 percent increase, the least amount of characters for brawl is going to be 35-40
Log in to comment