Evolution:

First, although you(anonymous evolutionists) can send me a link to a list of alleged transitional fossils, this proves nothing. May of your claims can be answered/responded to here http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers/top-ten/evolution-myths I see no need to repeat and create a long post here with information that would resemble the facts on that website.

One of you said that it is rare to find animal/transitional fossils because of the time frame. Why then, do we find dinosaur fossils in such abundance? Certainly they existed before if not at the same time as animals. And why are the anima fossils we find only fossils of whole animals? For example, we don't find half monkey half bird fossils. (I know that is not an alleged branch of the tree, I am just making a point) Another thing, who interprets the evolutionary tree? Do all scientists agree on its interpretation? Who interprets the fossils? For exampe, if you found a skull with sharp teeth, why would you assume that they are used to tear meat apart? Pandas have sharp teeth and they are not meat eaters. There is no way to tell what something was used for unless it was observed. Scientists make this mistake all the time when interpreting evidence like fossils.

Or another really obvious, undeniable thing:

Every creation has a creator. Every invention has an inventor. Why should humans be any different?

First, the Bible can be proved through its large amount of ancient manuscripts, which total to over 23,000: more copies than any of Plato's or Caesars works put together and multiplied by 10. Yet you don't question Caesars works. Second, the Bible can be proved through history and archaeology. There has not been a single archaeological find that disproves the Bibles claims. Third, there are several 3rd person accounts that verify Jesus' miracles and existance, and that he rose again on the third day.

Evolution requires that species grow over time, developing new features. One might call this macro evolution. And it is said that evolution took place over millions of years. If that was true, shouldn't there be just as many "transitional" fossils as there are normal ones? But this is not the case.

I never said that evolution explained where we came from. But if it explains the diversity of life, then this statement still stands.

"And it is said that evolution took place over millions of years. If that was true, shouldn't there be just as many "transitional" fossils as there are normal ones? But this is not the case."

Think about this logically.

First, the Bible can be proved through its large amount of ancient manuscripts, which total to over 23,000: more copies than any of Plato's or Caesars works put together and multiplied by 10. Yet you don't question Caesars works. Second, the Bible can be proved through history and archaeology. There has not been a single archaeological find that disproves the Bibles claims. Third, there are several 3rd person accounts that verify Jesus' miracles and existance, and that he rose again on the third day.

Evolution requires that species grow over time, developing new features. One might call this macro evolution. And it is said that evolution took place over millions of years. If that was true, shouldn't there be just as many "transitional" fossils as there are normal ones? But this is not the case.