[QUOTE="mantisybza"][QUOTE="junk56"] I'm serious... ok maybe not halo, UT3 or Haze but seriously, stuff like Call of Duty 4, blacksite area 51, medal of honor,.... i can't get past they are ps3 because simply watching the killzone trailer made some games look humiliating to be on the ps3. I mean seriously i thought lair looked AMAZING going into e3 and then watching the killzone trailer.... lair looked meh...
But seriously.... if you watch CoD 4 you can see the horrible fire textures etc and scripted animations.... Especially the deaths too. Again, no physics at all in the game and hundreds of jaggies.
Watching that killzone e3 trailer really set the new bar of what Next-gen SHOULD look like. who else thinks this?
btw here's the FULL gameplay from e3... its not cut off so enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7APPge9mDUM
gizmo_logix
I dont think killzone 2 makes all other games look last gen but they do look inferior to killzone 2.
and killzone 2 rag dolls effects MAKE other game ragdolls LOOK LAST GEN.
Killzone 2 graphics are BETTER than halo 3. if you say halo 3 graphics are better, your eyes are worthless.
The guys at E3 said Halo 3 looks beautiful (polished colors). But Gears and KZ2 are more gritty/particles/textures. UT3 is going to rock too since it's optimized for the PS3. It's going to be interesting how KZ2 and UT3 for the PS3 stack up against Halo 3 and Gears. Im sure Halo 3 is looking beautiful but i like KZ2 looks alot better, it gives a more realistic, warzone look as halo is more on a jungle, forest looking enviorment not saying there anything wrong with that its jsut KZ2 art direction appeals to me more.
Log in to comment