luzarius' forum posts

Avatar image for luzarius
luzarius

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 luzarius
Member since 2004 • 226 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:
@JimB said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

They are resisting someone who attacks the US organizations. Which would be the patriotic thing to do. You know not let a president erode our protections for his own profit.

What US Originations?

He's attacked the free press, the judicial department, the intelligence community, the court system, congress etc. What hasn't he attacked?

Presidents are allowed to defend them self from attack and are allowed to criticize US government organizations.

Most of the MSM constantly try to smear him. They're so biased against Trump that it's suspect. I've never seen this level of bias against a President before and it makes me not trust most of the MSM.

Your side made fake rape allegations against Kavanaugh. Do you think I could ever trust a political party that stoops to such a low level? No way.

The MSM implied that Trump raped a thirteen year old one week before the election, I'll never forget that. TRUMP HAS EVERY RIGHT TO CRITICIZE (attack) the FREE PRESS.

Avatar image for luzarius
luzarius

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 luzarius
Member since 2004 • 226 Posts

@Vaasman said:
@luzarius said:

What could possibly compel an American patriot to #resist their fellow Americans (Republicans) who make up 50% of the population?

Democrats & Republicans are supposed to work together for the betterment of America, yet your motto is #resist.

My nationalism compels me to always want to work with you guys and NEVER resist you. You're my brothers & sisters, my fellow Americans FFS.

Question:

1. What the hell was going through your mind when you came up with the divisive motto of #resist?

2. Do you think you're being brainwashed or manipulated by foreign entities?

Considering your last two threads are deliberate conspiracy misdirection to blame the Democratic party for companies making independent, unrelated corporate decisions, I find your claim that you would never resist Democrats highly disingenuous.

Those companies openly give their endorsements to Democrats and DEMOCRATS ACCEPT THEIR ENDORSEMENTS, lol.

Avatar image for luzarius
luzarius

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By luzarius
Member since 2004 • 226 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:
@luzarius said:
@horgen said:

I expect most people to not realize what she means and how this will work.

A 70% bracket at 10 million or so doesn't mean you pay 7 million in taxes and left with 3 million if you earn 10 000 000 $ However what you earn from 10 000 001 and above will be taxed like that.

You don't want to punish people who have achieved the American dream with a 70% tax. If you tax the most rich & successful in America that badly, they'll leave the country and take their business with them and our economy will suffer. You want ceo's, innovators and business owners to always have the most money because they use that money to reinvest into new businesses. You're supposed to reward people who have achieved the American dream, that way people are motivated to always pursue the American dream.

The rich deserve lower taxes so they can use that money to reinvest into new businesses and new innovations. Why do you think America is #1 in the world? It's because we reward the rich and we don't punish them.

You can always move to Canada or Europe if you don't have what it takes to compete in America and there's nothing wrong with that.

Or you can hire other people if they leave...............

You don't want the super rich to leave your country. They're the movers and shakers of the world. I've worked with two small CEO's side by side. The way they think and the way they embrace their vision is truly inspiring. They have something the common man does not. It's important to keep them in America, not drive them away.

I'm considered middle class. I don't want to pay higher taxes in the name of socialism. It's not fair that I have to pay for other peoples medical insurance with my tax money. I'm not unreasonable though.

  1. I don't mind my taxes helping pay for kids medical insurance if they have no parents.
  2. I don't mind my taxes helping the disabled
  3. I don't mind my taxes helping the retired who have paid a life time of taxes.

As a minority I enjoy a vast amount of privilege in America, more than whites.

I can meet the CENTER-LEFT half way on certain issues, but the far leftists like Alexandria Cortez are a bit too extreme for me.

Avatar image for luzarius
luzarius

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 luzarius
Member since 2004 • 226 Posts

@blaznwiipspman1 said:

@luzarius: they love to give anti free market protections to corporations. I don't care if you're rich or poor, you shouldn't be getting welfare subsidies and handouts period. The majority of welfare is going to the rich.

Hmm, I agree with you on these points. Too bad there isn't a like button or something.

Avatar image for luzarius
luzarius

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 luzarius
Member since 2004 • 226 Posts

@blaznwiipspman1 said:

@luzarius: the conservatives are just as big communists than the Democrats, prove me wronf

I'm trying to understand this. Are you saying poor conservatives rely on welfare too much or something?

Avatar image for luzarius
luzarius

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 luzarius
Member since 2004 • 226 Posts

One of the many reasons I abandoned the Democrats is because they were flirting with socialism and sympathizing with Islam, a religion that destroyed my country of origin.

Socialists, communists & nazi's are criminals, they're worst elements of society.

Avatar image for luzarius
luzarius

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 luzarius
Member since 2004 • 226 Posts
@horgen said:

I expect most people to not realize what she means and how this will work.

A 70% bracket at 10 million or so doesn't mean you pay 7 million in taxes and left with 3 million if you earn 10 000 000 $ However what you earn from 10 000 001 and above will be taxed like that.

You don't want to punish people who have achieved the American dream with a 70% tax. If you tax the most rich & successful in America that badly, they'll leave the country and take their business with them and our economy will suffer. You want ceo's, innovators and business owners to always have the most money because they use that money to reinvest into new businesses. You're supposed to reward people who have achieved the American dream, that way people are motivated to always pursue the American dream.

The rich deserve lower taxes so they can use that money to reinvest into new businesses and new innovations. Why do you think America is #1 in the world? It's because we reward the rich and we don't punish them.

You can always move to Canada or Europe if you don't have what it takes to compete in America and there's nothing wrong with that.

Avatar image for luzarius
luzarius

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 luzarius
Member since 2004 • 226 Posts

1. Gameplay
2. Story
3. Graphics
4. Breast & Butt Physics
5. Hot Babes
6. Did I mention hot babes? Like Morrigan, Ciri, Yennefer, Triss, Liara, Lara Croft (with her traditional sexy outfit, the one with shorts and skimpy top).

Avatar image for luzarius
luzarius

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 luzarius
Member since 2004 • 226 Posts
@drlostrib said:

Avatar image for luzarius
luzarius

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 luzarius
Member since 2004 • 226 Posts
@drlostrib said:
@luzarius said:
@drlostrib said:
@luzarius said:

You miss the point. Please think before you respond. Don't just type out of emotion like a typical leftist/liberal/Democrat. I'm not talking about a literal physical battle on a battlefield where we kill each other. It's an ideological battle. Surely you understand that unless you lack basic comprehension skills.

so you complain about democrats wanting to resist certain policies and ideologies of the President, but at the same time refer to them as your enemy and want to do "battle" with them--some might even say "resist"--their ideologies and policies?

Seems more than a little problematic

I'll put it very simply so you can understand: Understand your opponents

you keep complaining and berating democrats/liberals for resisting, because you want them to give you what you want, for example: The Wall. But you still view them (and their ideologies) as enemies and opponents. So all this "my fellow Americans" and "brothers and sisters" is just a bunch of BS

Democrats used to support the wall, now all of a sudden they don't. They're inconsistent. You #resist a policy you once supported, yet offer no better solution because you rely on illegals becoming citizens in hopes of them voting Democrat. You keep ignoring this, because you know it's true.

I do consider you guys political opponents and fellow Americans until you start putting foreigners ahead of your fellow Americans. So it's a mixed bag. Your party is all over the place ideologically and you don't have a strong core message.

drlostrib said:

@luzarius said:
@drlostrib said:I've read your viewpoints, and I disagree with many of them, and even find some of them to be un-American

1. How is building a wall to deter illegal immigration un-american?

2. How is putting America's interests first un-american?

3. How is defending and encouraging free speech un-american?

4. How is encouraging people to judge by content of character and not skin color un-american?

Progressives/liberals/Democrats/leftists exhibit the following behavior:

  • support illegal immigration
  • encourage illegals to walk across the border which is dangerous and has led to lots of migrant deaths (evidence for this is all over the web, make an effort).
  • no longer support a wall, relying on mass migration in exchange for democrat voters to support chain migration
  • hate white people (i'm not white, but I don't tolerate hate of any kind, not even towards white)
  • put foreign countries first, you'd rather give 10 billion to latin america than support a southern border wall.
  • support giving people jobs based on their race, not ability
  • sympathize with Islam, a religion that strips freedom, leads to authoritarianism and oppresses women & LGBT.

The list goes on and on why your side sucks.

Go ahead and respond with one sentence like a typical leftist/liberal/Democrat who can't think for himself and is brainwashed. I expect nothing less than minimal effort from you socialists.