Investor9872's comments

Avatar image for investor9872
Investor9872

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

There needs to be a way for those people who don't have phones to use this 2-step verification process as well!

Avatar image for investor9872
Investor9872

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Hopefully, the Insider codes will be going out early this weekend. That would be great for the dedicated Battlefield community, most of whom probably have already signed up for it.

Avatar image for investor9872
Investor9872

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Gelugon_baat: He's not an uban legend, you baboon! Jack the Ripper is real, unless you're bi-polar or delusional enough to think that those 6 women weren't brutally murdered and are still alive today???

Avatar image for investor9872
Investor9872

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

At 4 times more powerful than the XB1, that's not an upgrade. It's an XB2.

Avatar image for investor9872
Investor9872

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Of Course, Infinity Ward is going to congratulate DICE! It's all about marketing. Infinity Ward knows that it's decision to be lazy and still use a 7-year old graphic engine lost this next-generation battle with DICE. Infinity Ward, Treyarc, and others working for Activision and their Call of Duty franchise still refuses to invest in dedicated servers for improve game play for the consoles, and that is just egregiously wrong. And that wasn't enough. They all don't want to invest any money on improving their graphic engines either. It's been over 7 years now, and all of their Call of Duty games look exactly the same. You could have put Modern Warfare 2.5 in the title instead of Infinity War and it wouldn't have made a difference. The consumer needs to stop supporting this kind of predatory business plan. Gamers need to say enough is enough. If these developers and publishers want us to spend $99 plus on these games, then they need to invest all those profit into improving the multi-player infrastructure and in-game graphic engines.

Avatar image for investor9872
Investor9872

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Legend002: I would rather have a physical copy.

Avatar image for investor9872
Investor9872

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@andfx8: I wish that were true. Because then Star Wars Battlefront would have been a much, much better game.

Avatar image for investor9872
Investor9872

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Kunakai: No. They could have decline the invitation to the EA's Star Wars demo event, and would still have access to the game via EA's Access, like a lot of other major publications did.

Avatar image for investor9872
Investor9872

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@inmycontrol: Not only did BF4 has a main campaign, it has 64 players vs 40 for Battlefront. BF4 also ran at 1080p instead of Battlefront's 900. BF4 has a server browser, squad-based game play with up to 5 players in your squad so that you can use as spawn points in those larger maps, 4 specialists with their own weapons and gadgets, transport vehicles to transport a lot of troops to those far reaching places, tons of weapons and accessories for them, in-game chat so you can talk and coordinate with your squad mates.

Star Wars Battlefront stripped all of those out of the game. It has so little content.

Avatar image for investor9872
Investor9872

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Jdzspace: A ton of new modes? A single player campaign? You're either dreaming or didn't get the memo. Only 4 new modes. No single-player campaign.