[QUOTE="inerte"] Having finished the game, I have to agree. It's a pretty game, with a great story and awesome sound effects / music. But the actual gameplay sucks. Launch an Incinerate, wait for the enemy to die, rinse and repeat (with a couple hacks here and there).
Verge_6
You can play any game like that. Anyone who abuses one attack is a tool and not worthy of playing the game. Pfft, Zelda. All you do is mash the 'A' button. There's a few shield blocks here and there.
BioShock is a FPS, where the objective is to kill the enemy. That the whole point of the game.... if it can be accomplished with a button press, which if you fail you just ressurrect a few meters behind to press the button again... then it's a stupid game. Stupid gameplay.
Zelda has different enemies, which require a different strategies, weapons, etc... I don't understand how it's even possible to compare the two. Oh wait, probably because you're just trying to hide the fact that BioShock is all about launching an incinerate on 50% of the enemies, and either freeze or lightining on the other 50%. The actual "playing" of BioShock is worthless. If it wasn't so pretty and the history so awesome, I would have dropped the controller 2 hours into it.
Running around launching one attack... stupid gameplay.
Log in to comment