So most PC owners are going to have to run the game in medium settings at most, otherwise the game will run about as fast as Heather Mills. I wouldn't waste my money on this game just so I can wish I had an expensive PC. It doesn't even look that good, game play wise, which is all that matters.

**** off and try to speak Dutch then you smart-ass argumentative little queers.

The thing about the Halo games (before this one and it's amazing coop mode) was that they could only be appreciated if you were good enough to play them on the hardest setting. Unlike great PC games like Deus Ex, Halo 1 & 2 were very average when played on the easy settings, but came into there own on Legendary. The balance of the weapons was the reason imo, you could really tell the brilliant balance between the weapons on the Legendary setting (you really had to use the charged up pistol to remove an elites shield, then shoot him once in the head with the pistol, and not waking the sleeping grunts by only smacking them, for instance). You could just walk through the game slapping enemies on the easier settings which was no fun at all.

I forgot to say before, but it was a good feature. Also, I didn't realise the graphics had improved so much from Halo to Halo 2,. but it's clear they did from the pics.

It baffles me how anyone could say that Bioshock is a better game than Halo 3. In every way (especially gameplay) Halo 3 is vastly better. Are these people not owners of 360 or something, that would explain it. Most of them haven't even played Halo 3 properly, or at all.