@katharsis369 Just because we're practically forced into using Windows PC's to play games, doesn't mean we have to like it. It's a very restrictive platform and an open system such as Steam and Android will do wonders for the entire gaming industry.
@Daian But the controls on phones suck major balls. It's okay for casual games but I've been trying to play Vice City on my Note 2 and don't get me wrong its very impressive but even on that massive screen it's infuriating at times. I believe this Project SHIELD has great potential.
I think Journey deserves it. It might not be long but it is definitely memorable and is in my opinion the first game that is truly artistic. It's a game that doesn't rely on the fancy mechanics we're so used to, but instead gives you an incredibly emotional experience so few games are capable of.
PC gamer for life!! Especially for FPS's. Mouse is infinitely better than analogue sticks. For the foreseeable future no console will be able to even come close to keeping up with the diversity and rate of evolution of a desktop.
I can't afford both games and I'll be buying one of these games almost solely for the multiplayer so the length and quality of single player isn't relevant. Imo MW3 will offer the run and gun fast paced action that has come be expected from the series. BF3 on the other hand will be more tactical and like many have said the average length of each match will be a lot longer. I would say that if you want a casual fun game you should go for MW3 but if you want a more serious game where you have to use your head go for BF3. Also another big difference between MW3 and BF3 is that kdr definitely isn't everything in BF3 and MW3 will definitely get very repetitive after a while. so for me BF3 all the way!!
hahahasan's comments