@dabear: "We don't know the steam sales numbers. You say "far higher", but you don't know the number."

Play tracker from 3 weeks ago had estimates of over 1 million players on Steam already. And that's only for the people who bought the premium edition. Obviously the game continued to sell since then. Steamspy has it as at least 2 million owners. So yes, we do know the number is far higher than 330k.

"I never reply to you unsolicited. Maybe do some reflection..."

Who cares? I've still barley interacted with you. This is an online forum where people talk to each other, if that's difficult for you to accept maybe you shouldn't post online.

@dabear: "I really don't care whatyousay, Fedor. But, since you stalk my posts like Mark David Chapman"

I've barley had any interactions with you, don't flatter yourself.

"10 million players, and the most Steam can account for is330kbecause, as you said, we don't even know how many copies were sold on Steam."

Untrue, we know the total players is far higher than the concurrent numbers.

"So, like I said: the comparison is stupid, GameSpot is now CowSpot, you look like a fool."

How so? I'm not the one desperately throwing around numbers and getting angry at an article.

You appear to care a lot. I'm not sure how correcting your silly math is coping either. Coping is more like what you're doing here using BS numbers comparisons to deal with the fact that Starfield doesn't have the legs you thought it would.

330,000 is the highest concurrent count, meaning highest number of players playing at once on Steam, not the total players on Steam. No clue why you're comparing the two.

"Bethesda did not say how many copies Starfield has sold outright versus how many people are playing the title as part of their Game Pass membership."

Because the actual sales numbers are unimpressive.

Bunch of people in here got makuched for the very first time.

@bthegamer: Forspoken got a 5, not a 7.