deathtoallgods' forum posts
[QUOTE="deathtoallgods"]The Playstation controller is one of the most horrible designs ever. 15 years of avoiding that piece of junk.jerkface96i think its underrated, i have a ps3 but everytime i play my friends 360, i think the 360 fits better in my hand, and the thumb sticks feel a little better, i think the 360's controller is great for fps, while the ps3s is good for games like street fighter, skate amongst other things. Luckily I don't like fighters right? The Playstation controller was designed for Carnies and Japanese people. It is not for me(and most others judging from this thread).
Unless you REALLY favour the PS3 exclusives, why on earth would you buy a PS3 over a 360??
The quality of the console is 3 times as good thats why The PS3 is a waste of cash. Get over youRselfI am sure I will get my fare share of flames, but I am hoping that some will actually read the full blog post. It really isn't a slam against the X360, it ientifies an interesting phenomenon to explain why the SP3 exclusive library is better. I would have just posted it here, butI know I'll get "wall of text" comments and such.
With VG becoming such a large a widespread medium, I honestly believe their are a lot of very intelligent people out there who will find my analysis interesting. I am writing to share with them, not to anger fan boys or incite a riot.
An as for the seocnd commenter on a my lack of logic, actually, ths analysis is based entirely on logic, not opinon, other than the subjective nature of reviews in general. I didn't contirubte a single reivew that as used in the analysis, so my opinion is only relfected in my explanation of my finindings. To tell the truth, I actually assumed I would find no difference at all, or a small advantage for the X360, I was as surpirsed as the next guy.
I don't LIKE anything about the PS3's lineup. It sucks frankly. So our opinions clash[QUOTE="deathtoallgods"]
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
You have no basis to know if it was good or not, so making a claim that pertains to its quality is impossible.
Considering its library alone, it is simple to conclude that it is at least one of the best consoles to have ever existed. There was a vast array of games from basically every genre represented on the system... with several quality titles for each.hakanakumono
My brother had one so I can easily assess it's quality, although there were some good titles, I still feel the rose colored goggles have taken over at this point.
Some good titles?
Do you not realize how immense the PS2 library was? "Some good titles" equates to probably 10% of the good games in the PS2 library.
Maybe you don't understand............ I don't care how many titles it had. They have to appeal to me to be considered worthwhile. FF sucked during the PS2 era, MGS is the worst series ever, and Gran Turismo got old after 2. Honestly, the system is ok. The other RPG's are good, thats about all I will give it.
[QUOTE="deathtoallgods"]PS2 was ok at best. I never bought one so it couldn't have been that goodfoxhound_fox
You have no basis to know if it was good or not, so making a claim that pertains to its quality is impossible.
Considering its library alone, it is simple to conclude that it is at least one of the best consoles to have ever existed. There was a vast array of games from basically every genre represented on the system... with several quality titles for each.
My brother had one so I can easily assess it's quality, although there were some good titles, I still feel the rose colored goggles have taken over at this point.
Log in to comment