Im pretty sure soldiers are the only ones that can demolish things so there's that and of course the fact they are gonna be on the front line of battles which makes them pretty important. An engineer is more of a support ****and your really there to back up your team by building turrets and buffing ect, but i doubt they will be that great in general combat. Youve already admitted that medics are needed and an operative if played correctly will most like be able to change the tide of a battle. So id say they are all important in useful in their own way.
You should really wait until a game comes out before making statements like that. Until then its all speculation really.
betamon
Which statement did you feel was too strong? I've watched the videos they have put out. For evey objective the nice british lady says "only engineers can perform this task". Your right the soliders can blow things up but thats the only ability they have demonstrated. I'm just saying that if you get to an objective and your not an engineer your basically useless until someone else gets there who hopefully is the right class.
Yeah, but you can switch up your own class at any of the terminals that your team has control of. And I'm getting this game for sure. It's rated T and doesn't have a ton of cursing in it like most of the other shooters these days--well, except for the little kids over Xbox Live--they'll curse you down in a heart beat.
Only if you want them to. It comes with voice over IP turned off as default. You have to change an option to hear them. That's one of the main perks of this game to me. The game will communicate what I can do, and what I'm doing to other players without the need to talk to the kiddies and big kids (adults).
I don't know about the worst games I've played. Those crappy Burger King games are in the top five though.
I really hate GTA IV. It felt like I was asking everyone to be their female dog. That and it felt like the only thing they upgraded was the graphics. The controls were TOO tight and the story too serious.
Other than that I really wanted to enjoy Oblivion and Fallout 3, but there were just too many factors that made them unfun. That being said, I'm really looking forward to what Bethesda's putting out this year. I just have to be cautious because I've been burned in the past.
Single player was spectacular and was the one of the only Rockstar games where the protagonist actually made sense. It was a serious story, but damn enjoyable. That being said, I tried multiplayer once and the fact that I went from having the best horse to an ass (donkey) and some Mexican hombre killed it for me. Why did they want me to start with such crappy stuff? Anyway, I've never played a Rockstar game for it's multiplayer. I kinda hope that one day they'll come out with something with a fun multiplayer (GTA V I'm looking at you), but the single player was by far the best that they've put out. I know my friend didn't finish it, but that was because he did exactly what I told him not to. He tried to do all the side missions when the option arose. He would save people from bandits, go hunting, etc, etc. and by the time he got to the story he was already bored. I did find the beginning to be a bit boring, the middle somewhat interesting, and I was hooked by the end. Then I died a little when it was over.
Just search the fileshare for game types and sort by most popular. It took us about 45 minutes to beat (with 2 other people) with my gametype. It'll probably be faster with one that's been created by someone else.
Log in to comment