[QUOTE="americahellyeah"]anyone who believes in evolution can't believe in any form of God then.. or else they're just doing what most religions do, picking what they want to be true out of the bible, and ignoring the rest. linkthewindow

or the duty of one person towards another...you think it is the same as slavery...but really just the payment of dues. Even today, if you dont pay or cant pay for a meal, you may pay that due in labor. Labor has changed along with terms used to describe it.

[QUOTE="Wolf-Man2006"]

Sure, though I'm never good at remembering certain things. There was one example in the late 70s when some sort of water dino was found near Japan (it was a few months dead.) I forgot the name, but what I do know is according to Evolution, a certain race will die off and a new one will come. What happened with that water dino? It should have been dead millions of years ago.DeeJayInphinity

Amazing how bees can fly yes...sorry just saw a movie.......

Plus I would like to mintion, how amazing it is that man has never acted in acordance to evolution nor the laws of nature until our concious is aware of actions and the spirit of a person or persons changes that performance.

[QUOTE="americahellyeah"]anyone who believes in evolution can't believe in any form of God then.. or else they're just doing what most religions do, picking what they want to be true out of the bible, and ignoring the rest. fanofazrienoch

I wounder what the human race will look like in the future...6 arms, 96 fingers, 4 legs, 2 heads, more holes than now...USB connectivity.

Anyways...I think something had to have sparked that first evolution from bacteria to bug/animal/w.e. Now...it's obvious humans didn't always look like we do now...it's just unreasonable to DENY evolution completely, I don't think that's done anymore. Just the fact that humans were half our size in the roman times is proof enough...the rest are just ideas and theories. Believe what you want.

a55assin

[QUOTE="BangsLiekWhoa"]and like stated above. micro-evolution is perfectly fine by me and makes logical sense. macro-evolution tho is a problem especially since they still are missing parts of the chain apart from some species that look similar... so a hawk and a sparrow are both birds...i highly doubt they both came from the same great-grandparents...xscrapzx

There is evidence starting to support that raptors are ancestors of birds, I think one thing to show that, that is becoming more of a fact is to look at a birds foot, and tell me that does not look like a reptile's foot.

If anyone desides to actually learn about the reasons behind something...you go to the source, not looking up what someone else stated. Thats the only way to truly understand the reasons behind the words and a clearer presentation of the Word. For more information, Catholic.com is a wonderful website filled with Catholics and non-Catholics (other Christians, Jews, Islamic, Estern religions, and athiests as well). A visit would be helpful in any material and for any material.

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="RationalAtheist"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="RationalAtheist"][QUOTE="notconspiracy"]

BTW, Chrestus is derived from teh Greek word "Christos" which means "the annointed one" There was only one Christus or Chrestus that was venerated by early christians. Second, most scholars regard the first passage wherein Josephus mentions Jesus as partially or mostly genuine as the term "wise-man" is usually used by Josephus, and a christian scribe probably would not have referred to Jesus as a mere wise man. Also, Josephus mentions Jesus a second time when he talks about the martyrdom of his brother, James, and there really is no serious scholar actually disputes the validity of this second passage.

RationalAtheist

That's odd, because Josephus testement on Jesus has been much criticised:

"The topic of the Testimonium's authenticity has attracted much scholarly discussion. Louis Feldman counts 87 articles published during the period of 1937-1980, "the overwhelming majority of which question its authenticity in whole or in part"

Do you know what authenticity means?

No, read it carefully, it says this in the first paragraph:

"The other passage mentions Jesus as the brother of James, also known as James the Just. The authenticity of this latter passage has been disputed by Emil Schürer as well by several recent popular writers." Dismissive stuff, huh?

Despite my link to the value that can be ascribed to the text, you still manage to infer more meaning out of it.

You then lie (again) about the validity of the text.

[QUOTE="blacktorn"][QUOTE="DeeJayInphinity"][QUOTE="blacktorn"]

So it's not by chance that the earth is the only planet that holds life forms?

Of course that's what atheists believe...

MindFreeze

But the chances of a planet forming where the Earth is and supporting life are pretty hard to calculate. If you can develop a way to calculate those odds, you will probably get a Noble Prize because you'd have to know everything there is to know about planetary formation and the exact way the Earth was developed, and that takes a lot of brain power. Good luck!

There is no supporting evidence what-so-ever that life has existed on planets other than earth,and you just dodged the fact that you believe you are the result of coincidence of natural phenomenons.Scientists far and large believe we are the result of coincidence,that the earth formed the way it did ect,which in my eyes is very sad,that they choose to go that route instead of believing in a creator and there hearts.Rebellion is very ugly...

P.S. I'm going bed

I'm pretty sure some very reasonably photographic (and other) evidence has been collected to support the theory of there being life on other planets and their moons, such as evidence for there having been water at some point and still is inside the planets and moons.

It is incredibly ignorant to say there is no life anywhere else, do you have any idea of how many galaxies there are?

I'm trying to make sense of what else you said, but I didn't succeed.