[QUOTE="bowser3"]um then psp would bemad by nintendo right|? and have better battery life and a low price i suppose , get real , psp will never have mario , zelda or anything , and no to the one who claimed psp can mod nd run roms that is illegal , i hop e you get busted in fact it illegal talkin about it so shut your can , and resistance lbp etc like ia said are better on ps3 /2Youre kind of wrong. Lets take a 9/10 ds game like Mario and Luigi 3. If that game was realesed for psp, it wouldve been better than the ds version, because of graphics and all that other stuff. Same thing with pokemon, if they were realesed for psp, they to wouldve been superioir than the ds versions. Those games didnt really utilize the stylus that much, so if they were on psp, it wouldve not affected their ratings. Heres the thing, those games arent available on the psp. The ds has more good excusives to offer than the psp does. You were only naming multiplat games, while you shouldve been naming how many good exclusives the psp has, compareed to the exclusives the ds has. Of course the psp multiplats are going have more quality than the ds ones. The psp does has standards unlike the ds. But the multiplats games you named dont even matter becaouse no one even cares about them, they got low ratings, ds and psp versions. The ds has more good exclusives than the psp does.
mariokart64fan
What the heck r u talking about? Im sorry but did you even read what i put. I was saying that the reason the psps library isnt as good as the ds is because it dosent have as much as good exclusive as the ds has. I wanst saying that Mario or Pokemon games should be on the psp. I was saying that if they were thay would be better, but since their not on the psp, the ds has more good exclusives than the psp. Dude wtf, when did i ever say i was running ds games on my psp, you can barely even play them, theres no sound, NO TOUCH SCEEEN, its super slow, and u have to hold the psp sideways.
Log in to comment