[QUOTE="Dave_NBF"]
[QUOTE="bluemantan"] 1440p eliminates the need for Anti-Aliasing. I found that the 6850, especially when over clocked, was capable of handling many games that I tried at Max Settings at Native Res without AA, including Skyrim, Assassins Creed 2 and BFBC2.no-scope-AK47
Didn't read the billion posts so this probably has already been addressed but I will address it again for you. U R Lion and U r Mad. I had an m18x Alienware notebook with an i72720, 8 gig ram, 750hd, TWO 6970M in CF on a 1080p screen and could NOT max BF3. I had to turn down the HBAO settings. There is NO way to max resolution of that monitor which is double the pixels of 1900x1080. Also the notebook I am referencing is a premium Alienware and cost 2400 dollars. I was upgraded for free due to problems to a 2760, faster ram, and 2 580M in SLI which are much better than the 6970s and there is NO WAY I would be maxing BF3 at your resolution. I get 40-50FPS maxed settings in BF3 multiplayer. Single player is higher but that is with 2 more powerful cards with better drivers than the 6970M.
Also, if you can get a tricked out notebook for 2400 that is only a 500 dollar difference. A pre-built DESKTOP PC with much better specs and GPU will run 1,000 all day. Buying a MAC to play those games is just plain stupid. If you are using a MAC for videos and editing and art then I think it's a good buy but then don't make a post talking about GAMING.
Wow your on point buying a Imac for gaming is a waste of money. The mad mac's can bash windows but we can even run osx or linux on our hardware that meets our needs with out a huge price. They have a good monitor but can not use it for games due to the gpu and that is just sad.
Well I did not mention BF3, as I do not own that game. All I am saying is that the 6970m is sufficient for 40fps average 1440p for skyrim assassins creed and bfbc2 maxed with no AA. I don't really personally care what artificial benchmarks say, I am speaking of personal experience.
Log in to comment