I really missed these videos. Anyway, I agree with genetic modifications when they are used to improve life quality (helping overcome diseases or dissabiities for example). Nevertheless, its important to take care of certain matters such as people's willingness to use these methods, I would not agree on imposing someone to be modified against his/her will.

First of all, Danny you really look like an AC character with that clothing. I was fooled by your similarity to Desmond. Second, the changes from AC to ACII were both needed and unexpected. The game took a leap of faith into a much better idea and gameplay.

In addition, both AC brotherhood and AC revelations felt too rushed, and unfinished in some aspects. Now, I hate Desmond, playing as Desmond, hearing Desmond's story, helping Desmond, and pretty much everything else that has to do with Desmond (no offense Danny o Dwyer, you merely look like Desmond. So you are more tolerable).

In conclussion, I like AC and I consider the second game as the best in the series.

When I read this article I thought: a group just adds the skill of every member to get a result, but a team multiplies the skill of each and everyone to achieve success. There is an added value when you get to know your team members.

Shepard already has its place on the videogame history and it would be counter-productive trying to milk him like other characters (*cough* MARIO *cough*). Anyway, now its the time to correct mistakes and look forward.

There is something about crude violence that makes an impact on you. I mean, you play Marvel vrs Capcom and you don't really feel like you are hitting your oponent at all, because the characters look too unreal (to put it somehow). However, this similar-to-real-life violence is the one that would happen in this context. So, even if I don't approve real-life violence at all, I have to say I agree on the use of it in this game

Another Classic comes for the new generation, I feel there is a tendency of resurrecting games here

There is something called "trying too hard". I mean, Jake Solomon could have saved himself from a lot of work if he just had punched every single person who didn't buy the game. That is a valid, aggressive marketing strategy

The collectors again? Well, they were good enough enemies in ME 2 so I think I approve

God has just given me the chance to correct my mistakes and get this AC collection, and at a good price too. If only my money were not already gone in the Killzone collection

I may sound like a cheap person, but even if a PS4 were to appear in the next one or two years I won't buy it because:

1. If I see the videogames as a software I would have to consider that not all companies are up-to-date with it. There will be some trial-and-error and not all games will benefict for the new capabilities of the console inmediately.

2. Just because there is new console, that doesn't mean the old console will become useless. With this bunch of game collections coming out for the PS3, the lifetime of the console expands because there are still many good titles that most people haven't played yet.

3. Sometimes, you should consider the economic angle in gaming: even if I could pay for new games at the release time, most game retailers may not. Also, I won't be able to trade or sell my used games if the retailers have a hard time selling them. In addition, not all people would have a PS4, so I won't have the chance to even talk about it.