@SavageEvil: Thank you. Similar to those who bitch about Bethesda not allowing reviews before release day. Is it "ideal?" No. Is it a BIG deal? No.
And gamers wonder why they have a reputation of being emotionally stunted man-children.

@RELeon: Stay frosty, Señior.

Nice Fuckin' model! <b>HONK!</b>

@pjfry: Choose your words, Junior. Or more to the point, take the time to explain why said movie isn't "good enough" to warrant a sequel. For example, was the story clichéd? Absolutely.

That said, just what kind of bar do you use when determining whether or not a movie is "good enough."

Please, examples.

@hillelslovak: "People still care about that shitty movie."

Choose your words, Junior. Because phrases like that are the laziest kind. Typically made by whiny, entitled ass-hats (like yourself). As to my metaphor, it stands as-is. If you really think anything other than $$$ is foremost in determining what warrants a sequel you might not know what you're talking about.

Aside from the $$$, your righteous indignation that anyone other than yourself might be interested in said sequel is an astounding testament to your narcissism.

@frostywinnipeg: #jacksdoormatters

@hillelslovak: The one that made 3B at the box office?

That movie?

Personally, no. But I don't live in a bubble, either.

@dz99ls: Cool story, bro.

@trackles: "Avatar is such a shit film it needs 5 movies to be told properly"

WTF does that even mean? Use your words, Junior.

FALCONS RISE UP!