I don't care what this review says, I am thoroughly enjoying this game. After 11 hours so far, I have had tons of fun. Great graphics, great voice acting, interesting story, multiple ways to approach each mission, and the game just makes you really feel like a thief. Also the exploration in the city is great (When it's not interrupted by all the freaking loading times). My only issue with the game is how much of a monster it is to run on the PC. Even with an NVIDIA GTX 760 and a Quad Core 2.8 Ghz AMD processor, I can BARELY get 30 frames out of this beast when running on medium settings. This game was clearly not optimized well on PC and I hope they improve it later on. The cutscenes especially have HUGE lag at times.
Well even though I hate Call of Duty this one shows a bit more promise than the others. Since it's going to be next gen that means the graphics won't suck anymore and it's a brand new sub franchise. We'll see how things turn out but as of now I am still not expecting anything great.
I knew this game was gonna suck. It looks like Crysis 3 just followed the COD route and decided not to really change anything and just make the game easier. It's like the biggest feature they were hyping up was a bow... Seriously when a bow is the biggest feature added in a game, you know it's gonna suck.
@videogamer008 I don't. Rocksteady should have stayed as the main developer. Why did Warner Bros feel the need to get rid of a great thing? I'll tell you why... it's because they sold the franchise so they could make more money.
Sheeeet a new developer is making the Arkham series? Goddamn it why do game publishers always do this, they have a a great developer making great games and then they just throw it all out the window and hand it to some new developer who will probably **** the Arkham series harder than life fucking a person. Shame, I really loved this series. Damn you Warner Bros!
YOURMOM204's comments