@Cellpwn Agreed. RtCW + Enemy Territory were both up there in the greatest multiplayer FPS games of all time, we're talking the same league as Counterstrike and BF:1942. Whilst RtCW had a pretty decent SP it was MP that was its core attraction, and why it (along with W:ET) had such a huge fanbase.
People will say Wolf 3D/Spear of Destiny didnt have MP so its not really relevant to the series in general, but it was the MP of the later games that defined Wolfenstein for most people, and that cannot be ignored.
To call multiplayer a tacked on feature for wolfenstein is complete nonsense, but perhaps its for the better, given that the dev team leading it had nothing to do with the older Wolfenstein games (Guess id software are busy on doom 4 to be leading this project)
PS3 has much better hardware than the 360, but developers make better use of 360 system than the PS3 one, resulting in the xbox appearing to have better graphics. This comparison was kinda pointless as the PS3 has never been tested to the best of its ability, whilst the xbox games are developed more wisely to make better use of what the 360 has to offer. And what exactly do all the 360 fanboys mean when they say they have better games? You got GoW2 and Halo. Thats it. Two games and you think your the best. PS3 has got games like MGS4, Little Big Planet and Resistance 2 (which funnily enough for all you guys who think its a GoW rip off, got HIGHER ratings than GoW 2). and still has Killzone 2 coming up, Im not saying the ps3 is better, but it sure as hell isnt lesser than the 360. The market always changes, at some point the xbox will have better games, and vise versa. Online play is definitely better supported on the 360, that is for sure. But the PS3 has it free. Which one makes either console better is debatable. The 360 will not always be better than the PS3. The PS3 will not always be better than the 360. (but on that note, everything will always be better than the Dreamcast).
Timb3rWolf's comments