Almost all PS3 exclusives run in HDThe consoles can barely output 720p at some games. They have to go sub hd just to be able to run some games properly. Sooo....yeah consoles are tapped out. i say that from this point on we will see only minor improvements.
painguy1
TehKillzonelova's forum posts
Obviously need links....O.K....:?. If you dont believe what Devs state about their own game, then fine, be my guest[QUOTE="TehKillzonelova"]
I cant find links for every single one. I do not have the time, though these were from links and vids
[QUOTE="SparkyProtocol"]
Uh-huh. :roll:
SparkyProtocol
What Devs stated Obviously need links. I cant find links for every single one. I do not have the time, though these were from links and vids[QUOTE="TehKillzonelova"][QUOTE="SparkyProtocol"] Where did you pull your numbers out of?SparkyProtocol
[QUOTE="TehKillzonelova"]:lol:. Heres your conundrumTessellationyes keep using Infamous 2 bullshots,vs RDR multiplayer screenshots,why don't u use single player screenshots? let me guess... you can't find bad looking ones :lol: The Infamous 2 shots are confirmed in-game, and almost all of them were taken directly from the gameplay trailer anyways...
Says youRaymundo_Manuel...:?. Great post :roll: Where did you pull your numbers out of? What Devs stated
[QUOTE="TehKillzonelova"]
[QUOTE="vaderhater"]Explain the multiplat conundrum then? Love to hear your take on say RDR? Or alot of other multiplat examples then. Because if you beleive in what your saying it should have always been a slam dunk in the PS3's favor on those types of games from the get go.
:lol:. Heres your conundrum
LOL And your point is what exactly? That it looks mediocre graphically when compared to Infamous 2Well, Halo Reach is utlizing 95% of the 360's resources (Including the CPU), while KZ2 utilized 60%, GOW3 utilized 50-60%, U2 utilized 80%, while the Last Guardian, KZ3, and Infamous 2 are unknown, though all of these titles are the best looking games around graphically on consoles. Judging by that, i would say the PS3 still has more to give, while the release of HR will be the point where 360 taps out.
Because it had a better CPU and GPU and more memory available. This is not the case between the PS3 and the 360.[QUOTE="vaderhater"]
[QUOTE="hard_body79"]
:wink: the origianl xbox didn't have games built from the ground up but still managed to produce better gfx than PS2 games built from the ground upbecause of it's superior hardware....explain???
hard_body79
:cry: bu...but what about the superior 360 GPUz????
Its more than matched by the utilization of the RSX and Cell 8)[QUOTE="hard_body79"]
[QUOTE="mysterj"] Meh u sound mad. So ur saying PS3 games look better because they have better devs?vaderhater
Man lemmings are so despeate.
This just in xbox best exclusives only looked better than PS2 titles last gen because M$had better developers.
Oh and the wii is really the most powerful console known to man with gfx that look better than life and could own both xbox360 and PS3 in a micro-second...only the dev's haven't done it yet, 10 more years and tha :o POWAH will be unlocked!!!
Explain the multiplat conundrum then? Love to hear your take on say RDR? Or alot of other multiplat examples then. Because if you beleive in what your saying it should have always been a slam dunk in the PS3's favor on those types of games from the get go.:lol:. Heres your conundrum
Log in to comment